“extremely significant”

Additionally, post-hoc results showed that there were extremely significant differences in the pairwise comparisons between the five time points for ABA ( p < 0.001).

However, chemotherapy caused an extremely significant decrease in E2, conversely, caused an extremely significant increase in FSH as compared with baseline (p<0.001).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 (*), very significant at p < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at p < 0.001 (***), p < 0.0001 (****).

The frequencies of MNPCEs induced by CP in peripheral blood of mice were extremely significant ( P < 0.001) to that of the normal group [ Table 2 ].

The difference of injury severity between patients who survived the Wenchuan, Yushu, and Jiuzhaigou earthquakes was extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

Similarly, its improvement relative to CNN-ISA is also extremely significant ( p -value < 0.001).

The following rules were adopted: p < 0.05—statistically significant relationship (marked *); p < 0.01—highly significant relationship (marked **); and p < 0.001—extremely significant relationship (marked as ***).

Daytime temperature treatments had extremely significant effects on the duration of all stages, except for adults (egg, df = 2, χ 2 = 45.602, p < 0.001; larvae, df = 2, χ 2 = 96.213, p < 0.001; pupae, df = 2, χ 2 = 112.745, p < 0.001; adult, χ 2 = 14.083; df = 2; p < 0.01; generation time, df = 2, χ 2 = 169.127, p < 0.001; Table 1 ).

The regulatory relationship between paired genes that has extremely significant information transfer changes needs to be selected by us, so we retain the regulatory relationship with p-value < 0.001.

Registered data represented the mean values and standard deviations (SDs) of three experiments (ns = not significant, p ≥ 0.05, ∗ = significant, p -value 0.01–0.05, ∗∗ = very significant, p -value 0.001–0.01, and ∗∗∗ = extremely significant, p < 0.001). 4.

P-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*) if P < 0.05, as very significant (**) if P < 0.01, and as extremely significant (***) if P < 0.001.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant. 3.

* P -values of 0.001 to 0.05 reflected statistically significant differences; ** P -values of 0.001 to <0.01 were considered highly significant; and *** P -values <0.001 reflected extremely significant differences.

The apoptosis rate in the serum-free group was significantly higher than that in the normal control group and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.001).

In the present study, however, we observed an extremely significant reduction on FIQ ( P < 0.001) with cannabis oil, while allopathic therapy studies presented more modest reductions on FIQ and/or greater incidence of intolerable adverse effects, leading to considerable rates of participant dropout.

There were extremely significant differences between the Li and Han groups in the mother’s lifestyle and the use of intrapartum antibiotics (Chi-square, both p = 0.001).

There were extremely significant pairs (p<0.001) of co-occurring mutations in the lymph node-positive group: PIK3CA-LRP1B, CASP8-LRP1B, MLL3-BCOR, APC-BRCA1, MLL3-MLL2, and ARID1A-BCOR.

Threat appraisal had an extremely significant positive effect on coping appraisal (0.45, p < 0.001) and SDI (0.27, p < 0.001.

Data shown in Figure 12a demonstrated that the chimeric 9E10J IgG2a antibody caused an extremely significant survival prolongation ( P <0.001) in comparison with the control group.

the results showed that the survival of Δ pdh strains in RAW264.7 cells was significantly decreased at 4 h, 6 h and 8 h compared with WT and CΔ pdh strains, and the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.001), while there was no significant difference between WT and CΔ pdh strains ( P > 0.05) ( Figure 7 ).

For the first node, there were seven possible pairs, and it was apparent that the majority of features were extremely significant between the normal person samples and the patient samples (N vs. rest, 57 features with p <0.001) among all these possible pairs.

Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05 (*), very significant at P < 0.01 (**), and extremely significant at P < 0.001 (***).

Statistical significance for the relationships analysed by PLS was defined as p < 0.05–0.01 (significant), p < 0.01–0.001 (highly significant) and p < 0.001 (extremely significant).

Regarding the functional and prognostic factors, there were extremely significant differences between the two subgroups for mRS at discharge ( p < 0.001), NIHSS at admission ( p < 0.001) as well as NIHSS at discharge ( p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ).

The regression coefficients for both equations were extremely significant ( P < 0.001).