“extremely significant”

The significant difference was considered at p < 0.05, and an extremely significant difference was considered at p < 0.01.

The results show that the treadmill, rotarod, and swimming time in PE, GA, and EA groups is significantly prolonged, which has extremely significant differences compared to the model group (p < 0.01).

Results Initially, the paraffin sections showed extremely significant differences in the diameter, number, area and density of skeletal muscle fibers of the fetus, child, adult rabbit hind legs ( P < 0.01).

Compared with the controls, the fish in Ll:pSLC-G group had a significantly lower viral load on the 1st day post-challenge ( p < 0.05), and extremely significant difference was detected on the 3rd day ( p < 0.01).

Result analysis and discussion Grafting success rate The results of the variance analysis for the grafting success rate are shown in Table 5 , and the experimental model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Compared to group D, the level of BG in group H decreased regularly from (25.38 ± 2.21) mmol/L to (18.01 ± 2.53) mmol/L during five weeks, which showed extremely significant hypoglycaemic effects ( p < 0.01) at the 3rd week.

The results showed that the level of serum D-dimer in patients with intracranial aneurysms was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01, Figure 1(a) ).

We found that IPRS-low patients had significantly higher CYT, GEP, and MHC scores than others (Wilcoxon test p < 0.01, Figure 5 I–K); meanwhile, extremely significant negative associations were observed between the IPRS and three immune-related scores (Pearson correlation test p < 0.01, Figure 5 L–N).

Additionally, the ANOVA analysis was performed, and when compared with the VF group, there were extremely significant differences in the content of compounds of processed VF ( p < 0.01) ( Figure ).

In particular, the AGR showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) at almost every growth stage (Fig. 1 E).

ANOVA demonstrated that the ethanol concentration and extraction temperature had an extremely significant effect on the PEIL extraction yield ( p < 0.01; p < 0.05).

As shown in Table 2 , correlation analysis showed that the surface hydrophobicity was negatively related to EAI and ESI and that this appeared to be extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01).

Both varieties exhibited a marked increase in lignin and pectin at higher temperature, with extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01).

Compared with group CK, there were significant differences in group RIP ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant differences in group B ( P < 0.01).

It can be seen from Table 2 that, among those three factors affecting plant height increment, the main effect of different ‘salt stress degrees’ was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), while the main effect of ‘varieties’ and ‘spraying GABA or not’ was least significant ( P > 0.05), with which the P value of ‘spraying GABA or not’ was 0.055.

Differences were considered significant at p <0.05 (*) and extremely significant at p <0.01 (**).

Meanwhile, extremely significant differences were noted for lipase and amylase activities ( P < 0.01). 3.2.

In the 2024–2025 season, an extremely significant negative correlation emerged between PA and SLN ( P < 0.01; Table 2 ), indicating that more prostrate growth habits were associated with reduced leaf necrosis.

Intensity of Infrared Radiation at ST25 and Control Points in Normal Rats ( Table 1 ) NC group rats showed significant differences in the intensity of infrared radiation of the left ST25 and control point at 4.00, 4.75, 5.00, 5.50, 6.25, 6.50, 6.75, 15.50, and 16.00 μ m ( P < 0.05) and extremely significant differences at 5.25 μ m ( P < 0.01).

The level of estradiol increased significantly after subject 296 entered the reproductive period, and the difference between the early reproductive stage and the non-breeding stage was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

The difference in ciliostasis was extremely significant between the SZ200-vaccinated group and the unvaccinated group (p < 0.01).

“*” and “**” represent significant differences ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01), respectively.

** Represented an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) 3.

Irrigation methods showed extremely significant effect on the total GWP and yield-scaled GWP ( P < 0.01), while fertilization regimes had no effect on both. 4.

For the index of leakage rate, the horizontal transplanting operation speed and the length of feeding have a significant effect ( P < 0.05); Inclined transplanting operation speed have a significant influence (0.01 ≤ P ≤ 0.05) and the length of feeding have extremely significant influence ( P < 0.01).