“extremely significant”

Data comparison employed one-way analysis of variance test, with subsequent Dunnett’s multiple comparison test and significant difference was inferred for p<0.05 and extremely significant difference p<0.01.

Under the condition of 20 °C, an extremely significant decrease in GYM-A concentration occurred at pH 5 and 7 after 8 months ( p < 0.01), of which 14.8 ± 3.7% decreased ( p < 0.05) within the first two-month period and 81.8 ± 9.3% decreased ( p < 0.01) after 8 months at pH 7, while it showed no obvious decline under the treatment of pH 3 ( p > 0.05).

Significant difference was divided into two levels, i.e., significant ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

In this study, we further verified that the correlation relationship between HSEs and up-regulated genes was extremely significant (Fisher’s exact test, ∗∗ p < 0.01), which suggested that HSFs could upregulate HSP20 genes for African bermudagrass to cope with high temperature.

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or *, extremely significant at P < 0.01 or **.

On comparing three groups for assessing pain after 24 h and 7 days, again, an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) was found.

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

Leaf area, leaf shape index, leaf fresh weight and leaf dry weight were all showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among several treatments ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Significant differences between means were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD test (SPSS software version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05, and extremely significant difference was at p < 0.01, respectively. 3.

The difference between groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

However, there was extremely significant correlation between ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging capacities ( P < 0.01) ( Table 3 ).

The expression of StTCP15 gene increased during dormancy release, and the difference between dormancy and dormancy release was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), dormancy release and sprouting were about 4.35 and 9.00 times that in dormancy, respectively ( Figure 1C ).

These genotypes also showed extremely significant association with CaC at 4 months of age ( p <0.01).

From both mRNA and protein levels, the results confirmed an extremely significant increase in the expression level of S100A9 after transfection with pc- S100A9 compared with the pcDNA3.1 ( P < 0.01).

In addition, the mean value of each trait among progeny was positively correlated with the average parental value, with correlation coefficients ( r po ) ranging from 0.33 to 0.73, of which oil and SW appeared to be extremely significant ( p < 0.01) (Fig. 3 ).

Groups were compared using t tests to identify significant ( p < .05) and extremely significant differences ( p < .01). 3.

The OD 600 value of the recombinant strain was significantly higher than that of the control strain after 2 h of Zn stress ( p < 0.05) and reached an extremely significant level after 3 h of Zn stress ( p < 0.01). 2.7.

At the end of the experiment (28 d), the blood glucose levels of mice in the other four groups, except for the CK group, decreased to a certain extent and showed extremely significant differences when compared with the NC group ( p < 0.01).

Consistently, the level of MDA in erastin-treated cells was 3.6-fold higher than that of the control group, while there observed an extremely significant reduction after treatment with CuPBs ( p < 0.01) and DFO ( p < 0.05), respectively.

As shown in Figure 4 , an extremely significant correlation was found between TBARS and AV ( p < .01) in hot‐drying conditions and had a strong correlation under sun‐drying ( p > .05).

The ANOVA results showed extremely significant differences (P<0.01) between the genotypes of this population, and also significant differences between the various environments.

The percentage of non-viable pollen grains of SlAMS knockout plants (89%) were extremely significant higher than that of the wild type plants ( P < 0.01; Fig. 4 c).

The different asterisks indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, extremely significant differences at p < 0.01, etc. 5.

Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.

GLSB50 and GLSB70 (300 mg/kg per day) showed extremely significant increases in HC50 values (serum half-hemolytic values) (p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively).