“extremely significant”

The different asterisks indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, extremely significant differences at p < 0.01, etc. 5.

As shown in Figure 4 , an extremely significant correlation was found between TBARS and AV ( p < .01) in hot‐drying conditions and had a strong correlation under sun‐drying ( p > .05).

3 Results 3.1 Effect of the cropping pattern on aboveground dry biomass and nitrogen accumulation in the different ecological zones The cropping pattern, ecological zone, and their interactions had extremely significant ( p < 0.01) or significant ( p < 0.05) effects on aboveground dry biomass ( Table 3 ).

The results show that the treadmill, rotarod, and swimming time in PE, GA, and EA groups is significantly prolonged, which has extremely significant differences compared to the model group (p < 0.01).

On comparing three groups for assessing pain after 24 h and 7 days, again, an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) was found.

The ANOVA showed that the BC, B 2 , and C 2 terms had an extremely significant effect on ANC ( p < .01), while AB and AC were nonsignificant ( p ≥ .05).

The ANOVA results showed extremely significant differences (P<0.01) between the genotypes of this population, and also significant differences between the various environments.

The percentage of non-viable pollen grains of SlAMS knockout plants (89%) were extremely significant higher than that of the wild type plants ( P < 0.01; Fig. 4 c).

GLSB50 and GLSB70 (300 mg/kg per day) showed extremely significant increases in HC50 values (serum half-hemolytic values) (p < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively).

Using the stem as a control, expression was barely detected in the root, while it was about 26 times higher in the fruit, reaching an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01). 3.

As the FCR, ADFI and BW8 of higher RFI group were extremely significant higher ( P < 0.01) than the lower RFI group.

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

As shown in Table 2 , correlation analysis showed that the surface hydrophobicity was negatively related to EAI and ESI and that this appeared to be extremely significant correlation ( p < 0.01).

* Means significant difference ( p < 0.05), ** means extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01), and *** means extremely significant difference ( p < 0.001). 5.

Significant differences were denoted by p < 0.05 and extremely significant differences were indicated by p < 0.01.

By contrasting data of multi-index group and conventional group, hospital B differences were significant ( P < 0.05), and hospital A difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01).

The thickness of intestinal epithelial cells was significantly decreased under heat stress ( p < 0.05), and the difference was extremely significant between the proximal gut and distal gut ( p < 0.01).

We examined a total of 60 cows, including subclinical laminitis, chronic laminitis and healthy without any symptoms with 20 animals in each group. Inflammatory mediators Compared with healthy cows, HIS, IL-6, LPS, and TNF-α in subclinical laminitis group significantly increased ( P < 0.05), extremely significant increased HIS, LPS, TNF-α ( P < 0.01) as shown in (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ); compared with healthy cows, COX-2, HIS, IL-6, LPS, and TNF-α in chronic laminitis cows were significantly increased ( P < 0.05), extremely significant increased COX-2, HIS, TNF-α ( P < 0.01) as shown in (Figs. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ).

‘*’ indicates the relationship between the characteristics reached a significant level ( P < 0.05) and ‘**’ indicates the relationship between the characteristics reached an extremely significant level ( P < 0.01).

GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 was used to plot the results, and the significant difference ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) were represented by * and **, respectively.

The cellular MDA content increased to extremely significant levels at 0.8 mg/mL koumine ( p < 0.01) and significantly decreased at 0.05 mg/mL koumine compared to NC ( Fig 2C ).

Consistently, the level of MDA in erastin-treated cells was 3.6-fold higher than that of the control group, while there observed an extremely significant reduction after treatment with CuPBs ( p < 0.01) and DFO ( p < 0.05), respectively.

At 30 min after the injection of bacteria treated with CTLD, an extremely significant decrease in the number of bacteria ( P < 0.01) in crabs was observed compared with that in control crabs ( Figure 5 ).

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.01.

Between the no ultrasound abnormality group and the ultrasound abnormality group, there was an extremely significant difference in the detection rate of an abnormal chromosomal karyotype ( P < 0.01) and of VOUS ( P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference in the detection rate of pCNV ( P > 0.05).