“extremely significant”

frequency shows an extremely significant impact on the expression of likability (F = 19.965, p < 0.01), and the impact on animacy is also significant (F = 5.203, p < 0.05).

Differences were considered to be significant at P < 0.05 or *, extremely significant at P < 0.01 or **.

During the long-term storage of CWT, the characteristics of six typical aroma sub-attributes were happened significant ( P < 0.05) or extremely significant changes ( P < 0.01) ( Figure 2C ).

In contrast, these factors are not significantly correlated to EL yield, although they exhibit an extremely significant correlation with EG yield ( p < 0.01).

The marker “ ∗ ” represented a significant difference between the experimental group and the control group ( P < 0.05), and “ ∗∗ ” represented an extremely significant difference between the experimental group and the control group ( P < 0.01).

In this study, we further verified that the correlation relationship between HSEs and up-regulated genes was extremely significant (Fisher’s exact test, ∗∗ p < 0.01), which suggested that HSFs could upregulate HSP20 genes for African bermudagrass to cope with high temperature.

SNCG and ARNTL were common in both differentially expressed genes in females and males at four-week-old, and the expression difference between the fast-growth and slow-growth groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01), while there were no common differentially expressed genes in the eight-week-old males and females.

The comparison of results between lettuce and water spinach also indicates that lettuce is more sensitive to the toxicity of single DEHP, because extremely significant differences were observed for phytochrome indices ( p < 0.01) at the spiked concentration of 20 mg kg −1 [ 29 ].

The survival rate showed extremely significant difference between the infected groups and the control group at the end of observation period ( P < 0.01).

LS-HPC and starch were found to have extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and significant ( p < 0.05) effects on the bolus dissolution time, respectively.

There were significant differences between three variables (S, Cyl, LD) and four variables (S, Cyl, LD, CCT) ( p < 0.05), and there were extremely significant differences between three variables (S, Cyl, LD) and five variables (S, Cyl, LD, CCT, E) ( p < 0.01). 3.2.

Significant differences between means were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s HSD test (SPSS software version 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and the statistically significant difference was set at p < 0.05, and extremely significant difference was at p < 0.01, respectively. 3.

Under the condition of 20 °C, an extremely significant decrease in GYM-A concentration occurred at pH 5 and 7 after 8 months ( p < 0.01), of which 14.8 ± 3.7% decreased ( p < 0.05) within the first two-month period and 81.8 ± 9.3% decreased ( p < 0.01) after 8 months at pH 7, while it showed no obvious decline under the treatment of pH 3 ( p > 0.05).

Leaf area, leaf shape index, leaf fresh weight and leaf dry weight were all showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) among several treatments ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Significant difference was divided into two levels, i.e., significant ( p < 0.05) and extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

In addition, the mean value of each trait among progeny was positively correlated with the average parental value, with correlation coefficients ( r po ) ranging from 0.33 to 0.73, of which oil and SW appeared to be extremely significant ( p < 0.01) (Fig. 3 ).

The difference between groups was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

The expression of StTCP15 gene increased during dormancy release, and the difference between dormancy and dormancy release was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), dormancy release and sprouting were about 4.35 and 9.00 times that in dormancy, respectively ( Figure 1C ).

These genotypes also showed extremely significant association with CaC at 4 months of age ( p <0.01).

However, there was extremely significant correlation between ABTS and DPPH radical scavenging capacities ( P < 0.01) ( Table 3 ).

From both mRNA and protein levels, the results confirmed an extremely significant increase in the expression level of S100A9 after transfection with pc- S100A9 compared with the pcDNA3.1 ( P < 0.01).

On comparing three groups for assessing pain after 24 h and 7 days, again, an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) was found.

As shown in Figure 4 , an extremely significant correlation was found between TBARS and AV ( p < .01) in hot‐drying conditions and had a strong correlation under sun‐drying ( p > .05).

Consistently, the level of MDA in erastin-treated cells was 3.6-fold higher than that of the control group, while there observed an extremely significant reduction after treatment with CuPBs ( p < 0.01) and DFO ( p < 0.05), respectively.

The percentage of non-viable pollen grains of SlAMS knockout plants (89%) were extremely significant higher than that of the wild type plants ( P < 0.01; Fig. 4 c).