“extremely significant”

All six bioclimatic factors had extremely significant effects ( p < 0.01) on the distribution of venerable trees in Sichuan, with the exception of bio18.

Similarly, under the MLM model, 10 markers were significantly associated with blooming time and 5 had extremely significant association ( P ≤ 0.01; mean r 2 = 0.0560) (Points above the blue line in Figure 9d ).

Statistical determinations were carried out using a one-way ANOVA test, and differences between two groups of data for comparisons in all the experiments were evaluated as statistically significant ( ∗ p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( ∗∗ p < 0.01).

Cerebral ischemia caused an extremely significant amplification of NO generation ( p < 0.01) and NOS/cNOS/iNOS activity ( p < 0.01) both in serum and in brain tissue when compared with the controls.

Furthermore, both TVB-N and TBARS were extremely significantly negatively correlated with ordered secondary structures (α-helix: r = −0.916, p < 0.01; r = −0.929, p < 0.01/β-sheet: r = −0.923, p < 0.01; r = −0.925, p < 0.01) and free thiol groups (r = −0.981, p < 0.001; r = −0.989, p < 0.001) and exhibited extremely significant positive correlations with disordered structures (β-turn: r = 0.816, p < 0.05; r = 0.837, p < 0.01/random coil: r = 0.956, p < 0.001; r = 0.946, p < 0.001) and surface hydrophobicity (r = 0.988, p < 0.001; r = 0.994, p < 0.001).

Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05), and extremely significant when p < 0.01 (** p < 0.01).

When the concentration of hydrogen peroxide was higher than 200 μM, the suppression of cell viability was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

The difference between every two time points was extremely significant ( P < 0.01) (Fig. 5 , Additional file 2 : Table S6), indicating that a large amount of GA was synthesized immediately after seed imbibition and the downstream signal transduction pathway was also stimulated to promote rapid seed germination.

3.3 Effect of warmer temperature on BAT mass and UCP 1 immunofluorescence imaging Difference of BAT mass between the two regions was extremely significant ( t = 43.55, p < 0.01, Figure 3A ), and the reduction amount reached 65.9% in TC compared with PM.

The results show that among the test variables used in this study, A (ratio of water to material), B (extraction temperature), and A 2 , B 2 , and C 2 were extremely significant for the extraction rate of EUPS ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at p <0.05 level and extremely significant at p <0.01 level. 3.

* indicates a significant difference compared to the control (0.01 < p < 0.05); ** indicates an extremely significant difference compared to the control ( p < 0.01). 5.

A single asterisk indicates significant differences (0.01 < P value < 0.05) and a double asterisk indicates extremely significant differences ( P value < 0.01).

Moreover, the germination rate of the two plant species has an extremely significant negative ( p < 0.01) correlation with cement content ( Tables 4 , 5 ).

In addition, we further used box plots to more intuitively display the nine DEPs that were extremely significant ( P < 0.01) between the two groups (Liaoning/non-Liaoning samples) ( Fig. 3 ).

The Results of Monomer Units and Antioxidant Activities Analysis Firstly, the F test showed that the standardized empirical linear regression equation between the monomer units of Rhodiola crenulata PAs and antioxidant activity was extremely significant ( p ≤ 0.01 ).

2 and Table S 6 , most carcass traits, including slaughter weight, breast muscle weight, drumstick weight, and drumstick muscle weight, showed extremely significant negative heterosis ( P < 0.01) in reciprocal crosses of females and males.

On day 12 after treatments, tumor volume between myristoyl-CM4 (or ciaplatin) treatment and PBS (or CM4) treatment showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) (Figure 6C ).

The correlation with the occurrence and development of cervical cancer was extremely significant ( r = 0.913, P < .01), and the correlation with HPV16 infection was significant ( r = 0.753, P < .05), showing high specificity and sensitivity.

However, as the salt concentration increased above 1%, the sensory score rapidly decreased, and the difference was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

The levels of statistical significance were p < 0.001 (extremely significant) and p < 0.01 (significant).

Differences were considered to be significant at P <0.05 and extremely significant at P <0.01.

The Simpson index, Pielou’s index, Shannon index, and Observed_species index between the SS treatment and PFA treatment were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), indicating that the addition of PFA and NACl could significantly change the diversity of fungal communities in the soil, and the application of PFA could significantly increase the diversity of fungi in the community. 2.5.

In comparison between the treatment group and the control (Mock) at each time point, the expression level of the treatment group at the 12-h point was more than 3-fold of the control, while the comparison test statistics of the two groups after 6 h of treatment showed extremely significant ( P < 0.01, Student’s t-test).

There were extremely significant correlations at p < 0.01 between pH and Pb (r = −0.90), and between EC and Cd (r = −0.84).