“extremely significant”

The primary term B was extremely significant ( p < 0.001), while the primary term C was significant ( p < 0.05); however, the terms A and D were not significant.

Using all 70 markers, GAP prediction in Q × RX showed an extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001), r = 0.4819; using the 8 screened PIC > 0.25 and HWE-conforming markers, the correlation increased to r = 0.5755 ( p < 0.001); using the 10 significantly associated markers yielded a further increase to r = 0.5766 ( p < 0.001), representing the highest prediction accuracy among the populations.

The main part of this analysis is testing to see if we can consider the mother’s deficiency in vitamin D as a risk factor for the newborn, so for that we split the data into a contingency table ( Table 8 ), obtaining an extremely significant risk factor ( p < 0.001, RR > 1, OR > 1), so we can conclude that if the mother has a vitamin D deficiency, it increases the chance that the newborn will have a vitamin D deficiency more than eight times.

“*” represents significant ( P < 0.05), “**” represents very significant ( P < 0.01), and “***” represents extremely significant ( P < 0.001). 3.

In this study, the results showed that IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-a in control group were lower than those of the model control group, and there were extremely significant statistical differences (p < 0.001), indicating that LPS-induced zebrafish pneumonia models elevated inflammatory factors.

From Figure 8 , it can be concluded that in April 2022, the number of female cones had a significant negative correlation with the K content in November 2021 ( p < 0.05, r = −0.46), a very significant negative correlation with the N content in July 2022 ( p < 0.01, r = −0.51), a significant negative correlation with the K content in July 2022 ( p < 0.05, r = −0.40), a significant positive correlation with the C:N ratio in July 2022 ( p < 0.05, r = 0.38), and an extremely significant negative correlation with the K content in November 2022 ( p < 0.001, r = −0.62).

A P < 0.05 was established as statistically significant; significant: 0.01 < P < 0.05; very significant: 0.001 < P < 0.01, and extremely significant: P < 0.001.

C8α levels in vitreous of culture-positive bacterial endophthalmitis was around 137 ± 25.86, which was extremely significant ( P < 0.001) in comparison to control (1.20 ± 1.20).

The reduction was extremely significant ( | t | = 8.144 , P = 0.001 , paired t-test) by 29.00 ± 23.91 times on average.

Differences were considered statistically significant at *P < 0.05, very significant at ** P < 0.01, and extremely significant at *** P < 0.001.

The difference in WHO grade distribution was extremely significant (p<0.001).

However, it exerted an extremely significant effect on the drip loss rate ( p < 0.001).

Season and age had significant effects on MBC and MBN ( p < 0.05) and had extremely significant effects on MBC/MBP and MBN/MBP ( p < 0.001) ( Table S1 ).

The statistical results showed that the difference in evaporation between the covered group and the control groups was extremely significant (t (1) = 189.1, p < 0.001).

At 24 hours, the groups had an extremely significant difference in reported pain (p<0.001).

Overall fitting analysis using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) ( Figure 7 ) revealed that the characteristic fungal genera had an extremely significant and positive effect ( p < 0.001) on soil available nutrient content, while soil available nutrient content had an extremely significant and positive effect ( p < 0.001) on the tea quality index content.

On a relative basis, the FBA gene of the F10-D strain presented extremely significant upregulation on days 5 and 7 in YPD + Fru medium, with a 1.4-fold increase on day 5 ( p < 0.001) compared to that in the YPD group; the FBA gene of the T17-D strain in YPD + Fru medium was upregulated on days 1, 3, and 5, with a 1.5-fold increase on day 5 ( p < 0.05); the FBA gene of the TF15-A strain was extremely significantly upregulated on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and the expression level was upregulated almost 2.5-fold ( p < 0.001) on day 5.

The analysis of 7 MGEs showed a positive correlation with ARGs (r > 0.80, p < 0.01), particularly TNPA-07 , TNPA-02 and TNPA-01 were extremely significant positive correlation with aminoglycosides, β-lactams, MLSB, FCA, tetracyclines, and vancomycin (r > 0.80, p < 0.001).

Notably, TRADD exhibited an extremely significant difference in expression ( p < 0.001), while SFTA1P, ZBP1, PARP1, AIM2, and CASP6 also showed high significance ( p < 0.01).

PN exhibited an extremely significant positive correlation with SPAD, NN, IL, SDW, and FV ( p < 0.001), and very significant negative correlation with FDMC ( p < 0.001).

We concluded that there is an extremely significant difference between the groups ( p <0.001, X 2 =52.26).

Statistical significance was defined as follows: * p < 0.05, very significant when ** p < 0.01, and extremely significant when *** P < 0.001, ns: no significance.

The difference in PD - L1 expression level between the two groups was extremely significant ( P < 0.001).

PERMANOVA analysis revealed extremely significant differences between fallen leaf and fecal bacterial communities (F = 13.47, R 2 = 0.53, p < 0.001).

There was no significant difference in FAK expression, but p-FAK expression showed an extremely significant difference ( P < 0.001).