“extremely significant”

Extremely significant differences were denoted by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05. 3.

The migration differences between 12h and 24h for these two groups are significant (P<0.05) and between 48h and 72h are extremely significant (P<0.01).

* P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and extremely significant difference **P<0.01 and *** P<0.001.

With the increase of nitrogen fertilization, the canopy nitrogen concentration of summer corn increased, with the concentration under different nitrogen fertilizer treatments differing to an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01), but the difference between N2 and N3 treatments just reached a significant level ( p < 0.05).

The significance of the differences was tested by t -tests or one-way (ANOVA; * , p < 0.05, significant; ** , p < 0.01, extremely significant).

Specifically for the WGAN model in AO dataset and GAN/WGAN model in MI dataset, the classification performances presented were extremely significant ( * * p <0.01).

The activities in the pH 4 and pH 10 treatment groups reached 4.9 × 10 4 IU/mL and 2.5 × 10 4 IU/mL, respectively, with extremely significant differences (0.001 < p < 0.01, 0.001 < p < 0.01) compared to the pH 7.4 treatment group.

Notably, HS had extremely significant effect on linoleic acid metabolic pathway ( p < 0.01) (Figure 6 ), and an influencing trend was observed in the pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism ( p = 0.0502). 4.

As can be seen in the Figure 1 A, an extremely significant upregulation of LH and E2 levels ( p < 0.01) in the CH2 group was found compared with the WLS group.

Table 2 demonstrates extremely significant differences in both sides' step length and stride length between the sarcopenia group and the normal group ( p < 0.01).

In samples soaked in 0.5 g/100 mL NaHCO 3 , the blanching time had a significant ( p < 0.05) effect on the relative gray levels of the bands 2, 7, and 8 bands, while the difference in the relative gray level between bands 5 and 6 bands was extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Moreover, the differences in the TWG (3.283 ± 1.127 and 5.338 ± 1.882 kg for C and W, respectively) and ADG (109.4 ± 37.58 and 177.9 ± 62.74 g for C and W, respectively) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01). 3.2.

Our results showed that the influence of factors on the GSH yield is KH 2 PO 4 > peptone > glutamate, among which the influence of KH 2 PO 4 and peptone is extremely significant ( P < 0.01), and the influence of glutamate is significant ( P < 0.05).

The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD), *: indicate significant differences ( p < 0.05); **: indicate extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01). 3.

Compared to WT and NC, overexpression of miRNA-320a resulted in obviously decreased expression of osteogenesis-related proteins including RUNX2, OSTERIX, Collagen I, OCN, and OPN, and the decrease of expression were extremely significant ( p value < 0.01) ( Fig. 3 C-D).

Besides, the corresponding volumes of hippocampi in hippocampal subregions in I-MCI group were significantly reduced compared with those in normal group, and the comparison between the two groups indicated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05, extremely significant at p < 0.01 and non-significant at p > 0.05 level. 3.

According to a chi-square test, out of 3,178 markers, 96 markers on the map showed distorted segregations ( P < 0.01) even though the extremely significant SNPs ( P < 0.01) were excluded, and the total segregation distortion ratio was 3.02%.

papyrifera had extremely significant effects on the monthly average height of plantlets ( p < 0.01), while the root segment length and diameter had significant effects on the absorbing root’s formation rate ( p < 0.05).

For the microbiota, data were analyzed by Wilcox rank sum test, differences among treatments were considered significant at P < 0.05 or extremely significant at P < 0.01.

An extremely significant difference was accepted at p -value < 0.01.

The expression of the CFTR gene in HFLP was significantly higher than that in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.1), and the expression level of RRAS2 was detected to have an extremely significant difference in the HFLP diet than in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.01).

There were extremely significant differences among the temperature stress treatments ( p < 0.01).

The model R 2 was 0.9709, both values are extremely significant ( p < 0.01), which indicates that the obtained ternary quadratic fertilizer effect function is typical and could be used for statistical purposes and fertilization recommendations.

Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05 and extremely significant when P < 0.01.