“extremely significant”

The toxicity results were analyzed by Tukey’s test, and 95% confidence level analysis was performed using the statistics program SPSS; the evaluated P values were indicated by the symbols a (extremely significant difference, p < 0.01), b (significant difference, p < 0.05), and c (no significant difference, p > 0.05).

In different river basins, there was a significant correlation between the composition of methanogenic communities in the Yellow River basin and spH ( r = 0.28, p < 0.05), while in the Huangshui River basin, there was an extremely significant correlation with spH ( r = 0.43, p < 0.01).

Extremely significant differences were denoted by p < 0.01, significant differences by p < 0.05, and non-significant differences by p > 0.05. 3.

It can be seen from the Table 5 that there are extremely significant correlations between some factors (P < 0.01), such as population and GDP.

Through WGCNA, we obtained five modules and 29 flavonoid-related metabolites with extremely significant module−metabolite paired relationships (|correlation coefficient|> 0.9, P < 0.01).

The level of significant differences between the means of two data sets was p < 0.05, and the extremely significant level was p < 0.01.

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the normal and cancer groups were identified using the DESeq2 package (DOI: 10.18129/B9.bioc.DESeq2), in which P<0.001 indicated extremely significant, P<0.01 very significant and P<0.05 significant.

There was an extremely significant difference between the Positive group ( P < 0.01), LSSE groups ( P < 0.05) and the DM group. 3.2.2.

The migration differences between 12h and 24h for these two groups are significant (P<0.05) and between 48h and 72h are extremely significant (P<0.01).

With the increase of nitrogen fertilization, the canopy nitrogen concentration of summer corn increased, with the concentration under different nitrogen fertilizer treatments differing to an extremely significant level ( p < 0.01), but the difference between N2 and N3 treatments just reached a significant level ( p < 0.05).

The significance of the differences was tested by t -tests or one-way (ANOVA; * , p < 0.05, significant; ** , p < 0.01, extremely significant).

The selected independent variables were Z 3 , Z 5 , and Z 6 (P < 0.05), of which Z 3 and Z 6 reached an extremely significant level (P < 0.01).

This difference was statistically extremely significant ( P <0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

Specifically for the WGAN model in AO dataset and GAN/WGAN model in MI dataset, the classification performances presented were extremely significant ( * * p <0.01).

Notably, HS had extremely significant effect on linoleic acid metabolic pathway ( p < 0.01) (Figure 6 ), and an influencing trend was observed in the pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism ( p = 0.0502). 4.

The P-value < 0.001(***) was considered statistically extremely significant, P-Value < 0.01 (**) was measured statistically very significant and NS = Not significant.

Moreover, both OFB-L and OFB-H groups exhibited extremely significant reductions in MDA levels ( p < 0.01).

The activities in the pH 4 and pH 10 treatment groups reached 4.9 × 10 4 IU/mL and 2.5 × 10 4 IU/mL, respectively, with extremely significant differences (0.001 < p < 0.01, 0.001 < p < 0.01) compared to the pH 7.4 treatment group.

Our results showed that the influence of factors on the GSH yield is KH 2 PO 4 > peptone > glutamate, among which the influence of KH 2 PO 4 and peptone is extremely significant ( P < 0.01), and the influence of glutamate is significant ( P < 0.05).

It showed that the levels of these three hormones were extremely significant higher in the NM group than in the TM group ( p < 0.01, Figure 1 ). 3.2.

* P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and extremely significant difference **P<0.01 and *** P<0.001.

The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (Mean ± SD), *: indicate significant differences ( p < 0.05); **: indicate extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01). 3.

The expression of the CFTR gene in HFLP was significantly higher than that in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.1), and the expression level of RRAS2 was detected to have an extremely significant difference in the HFLP diet than in the LFHP diet ( P = 0.01).

Besides, the corresponding volumes of hippocampi in hippocampal subregions in I-MCI group were significantly reduced compared with those in normal group, and the comparison between the two groups indicated extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01).