“highly significant”

A highly significant correlation existed between total citations and average annual citations (rs = 0.653, p < 0.001).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ2(741) = 19,644.17, p < .001), further confirming the appropriateness of the analysis.

For the number comparison task, results revealed a highly significant NDE regarding both RT [ t (15) = –4.79, p < .001] and errors [ t (15) = 4.86, p < .001] indicating that children were significantly slower and less accurate for number pairs with a small distance (1,443 msec, 15.4% errors) as compared to pairs with a large distance (1,295 msec, 6.3% errors).

In all cases, P <0.05 was considered as significant, P <0.01 highly significant, and P <0.001 very highly significant, which was noted in figures and tables with asterisks.

Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference in drying pass rates across different drying times ( P < 0.001), with longer drying times associated with higher pass rates.

This difference from the number of patients resuscitated within the competences of the EMT or PM is highly significant (p<0.001).

Results and discussion Highly significant differences ( p <0.001) for BSR response among AB-QTL lines were observed disease incidence (DI) in all field seasons, as well as disease rating (DR) and area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) in the greenhouse with a moderately high broad-sense heritability ( H 2 ) of 0.61 for the tested resistance parameters.

The results of intergroup comparison using the independent-t-test showed a highly significant (p<0.001) distinction between the control and LLLT groups at different time intervals (baseline and six months after) (Table 1 , Figure 4 ).

When the RBS values are compared between control and diabetic groups, there was huge margin of increase in blood glucose, which was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant improvements were found for the main spinal parameters: TK reduced from 54.8±10° to 44.8±10° (p<0,001), LL from 55.1±8.28° to 50.9±9° (p=0.04), SI from 113.1±21mm to 89±30mm (p=0.003) and C7 from 58.6±12mm to 47.5±13mm (p=0,001); while L3 changed from 53±12mm to 47±13mm (NS).

Results There was a highly significant relationship between low stimulated Tg levels (<0.5 ng/mL) and the outcome of the diagnostic WBS at the first follow-up ( χ 2 = 14.7, P < 0.001).

there are other explanatory variables), the very large sample size (10 695) makes the effect of phylogeny highly significant ( P < 0·001).

There was a highly significant correlation between inattention of HKD and inattention of ADHD ( R s = 0.98; p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

It is routine practice to transpose basilic vein during proximal brachiobasilic fistulas[ 21 ] In a series of 70 patients with brachiobasilic fistulas in order to gain easy access to veins, Hossny[ 22 ] observed that all dialysis nurses were satisfied with the transposed veins, but only 53.3% were satisfied with the elevated veins; the difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

It was seen that all the morbidities were more prevalent in EG, that is, Group A and the difference of prevalence of morbidities between Group A and B was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), except the musculoskeletal disorders in which difference in prevalence was not statistically significant.

However, this appeared to depend almost uniquely on the highly significant differences that were seen in velocity measurements with versus without steer angle correction ( p < 0.001).

Baseline NIHSS score emerged as a highly significant predictor of stroke location (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.13–1.27, p < 0.001), with higher scores strongly associated with an increased likelihood of AC stroke.

Cumulative frequency plots (Figure 1 B) show a highly significant increase in inter-event interval (i.e. a decrease in event frequency) induced by DAMGO (KS test P < 0.001 vs. baseline) that persisted after 10-min incubation and was reversed by the opioid agonist naloxone.

Effect of time was highly significant from retrospective-to-training F(1,177) = 44.73, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.202, from retrospectively-to-prospectively F(1,177) = 16.844, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.087, and over the whole time frame retrospectively-training-prospectively F(1,177) = 28.733, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.140.

The majority of primary lung cancers presented as solitary nodules (81.8%), whereas lung metastases predominantly presented as multiple nodules (81.3%), with this difference being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

niloticus of T1 (control non-exposed) and T4 (pollen exposed) displayed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) increase in estradiol levels as compared with those groups (T3, T5) exposed to malathion and fed basal diet ( Fig. 3 G).

The mixed-effects Poisson regression revealed that both MDD and BPD binary were highly significant predictors of number of suicide attempts (β (118) = 0.88, SE = 0.27, z = 3.23, p = 0.001, and β (118) = 0.78, SE = 0.24, z = 3.29, p = 0.001, respectively).

The mean height measured by the DICOM was consistently greater than that measured by the PDF, with highly significant differences in the findings of four of the examiners ( p < 0.001).

If all cases were included, according to the intention to treat principle, the results were slightly smaller but still highly significant (n=25 in each group, mean difference in protein intake 36.5 g/day (p<0.001) and 1.0 ± 0.4 (C) vs. 1.5 ± 0.3 (I) g protein/kg/day (P<0.001)).

In addition, a highly significant interaction (21 days × 70 days) was found for the bursa of Fabricius index ( p = 0.001).