“highly significant”

For the remaining 39 participants, a one-way ANOVA was calculated for group effect showing highly significant group difference (F 2,114 =74.41, P <0.001).

Reasons for Non-Participation from the Employees’ Point of View A KMO value of 0.65 and highly significant Bartlett test ( p < 0.001) confirmed that an EFA can be performed.

3.3 Growth Performance and FCE Hora supplementation had a highly significant impact ( p < 0.001) on all growth performance parameters (Table 5 ).

This distribution was highly significant (χ 2 = 135.0, df = 1, p < 0.001).

Alt displayed the greatest resistance to desiccation, losing only 19% of its fresh weight, compared to 37% for CW and 46% for RB ( Figure 1 A): a consequence of the highly significant ( p < 0.001) cultivar by desiccation period interaction on fresh-weight loss.

value of −3.902, indicating a highly significant negative impact ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant improvement in the functioning of the kidney was noted using the blood urea and creatinine ( p < 0.001) levels.

There was a 62.2% risk reduction of all-cause mortality in statin group compared to comparison group and the difference in their survival time was highly significant ( P < 0.001) by log-rank test.

Our working example demonstrates a highly significant association between the variables A and B with a P value of < 0.001.

There was a highly significant difference between the water consumption of sham-irradiated and irradiated animals ( p < 0.001).

Over all loci, departure from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), reflecting the deviation in the direction of heterozygote deficit.

Consistent with our findings that RNF169 was able to inhibit 53BP1 IRIF formation when DYRK1A was inhibited by harmine ( Figure 3 ), we observed that overexpression of GFP-RNF169 in the DYRK1A-KO U-2 OS cells also results in inhibition of the 53BP1 recruitment to DSBs ( Figure 6(a , b ), the differences between the GFP- and GFP-RNF169-expressing cells were highly significant in all cell lines, p < 0.001).

Verbal communication (open-ended questions, summarization, and clarification) demonstrated a highly significant difference between groups ( P <.001), suggesting that the approach to verbal communication significantly affects the responses.

VA Difference and Letter Distortion The relationship between interocular VA difference (logMAR) and the average distortion intensity (average of all three letter types) across the subjects was strong and highly significant ( r = 0.7, P < 0.001).

The F ST pairwise comparisons among all groups corroborated results of the PCoA and allowed for the detection of highly significant (P < 0.001) values of differentiations (Table 3 ).

All pair-wise distances were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Correlation analysis revealed a highly significant negative correlation between M2 macrophages and neutrophils ( r = −0.875 and p < 0.001).

Enterobacter hormaechei exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with N (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), while Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella paramesenteroides showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative correlations with R, with correlation coefficients of −0.74 and −0.73, respectively. 4.

The one‐day lagged habitat volume was a highly significant predictor of habitat volume in each model, indicating strong temporal persistence ( p < 0.001; F = 3136.54, 4159.53, and 3203.80).

Differences among the median age at diagnosis were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for Kruskal-Wallis test among all 3 groups and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for subsequent pairwise comparisons among all pairs of disorders).

However, the robust MR Egger estimate, which may be less sensitive to outliers or influential points, was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant reduction in neck extension MVC from both interventions after 10 weeks of intervention ( P <0.001) and after 12 weeks of home practice ( P <0.001).

Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between changes in test–retest responses and the 7‐point anchoring question were all highly significant ( p < 0.001) and greater than 0.4, except for Everyday life (Global: 0.455.

Recovery group IV showed less improvement in Caspase expression (highly significant with group III, (P ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 11 ).

The effects of incomplete block structures within environments [Block (Env*Rep)] were also highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating substantial variation due to experimental design factors.