“highly significant”

The six major modules identified in this study may reflect the main molecular interactions and processes central to IM or HR responses to Bgt , because 1) they generally contained a large number of PMRR and hub-PMRR genes, and 2) they all showed high level ( R > ±0.8) and highly significant ( P < 0.001) module-trait correlation values ( Table S4 ).

Comparing the distributions of claims pooled for all low and high PRV countries, respectively, reveals a highly significant difference ( n low = 1211, n high = 1357; χ 2 (5) = 40.21, P < 0.001).

The difference was found to be highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001).

Results: There was a highly significant difference between cases and controls regarding urinary biopyrrins level ( P < 0.001).

The number of these susceptible persister colonies increases with the number of resistant colonies present ( Figure 3b ; R 2 =0.8384, F 1,16 =87.907, P <0.0001) and over time, as shown by the highly significant resistant colonies by time interaction term ( Figure 3c ; F 1,92 = 17.85, P< 0.001).

The overall model was highly significant (Wald χ 2 = 11318.91; P < 0.001). 3.2.1.

Global spatial clustering of positive holdings was highly significant (nearest-neighbour ratio = 0.39, z = –8.26, p < 0.001), with elevated density along coastal agricultural corridors.

However, there were highly significant differences between the annual numbers of citations received from Nature series journals when compared either with Nature , Science or Nature Immunology ( p < 0.001, Q = 6.767; p < 0.001, Q = 6.828; p < 0.001, Q = 6.791, respectively).

Neither genetic group nor the interaction of genetic group and pea genotype were significant, whereas pea genotype showed to be highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Overall Obstruct R 2 values for K = 2–4 varied between 0.91 and 0.98 and were highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating strong correlation between inferred ancestries and predefined populations and therefore strong population structure.

Results: A highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) reduction (10.12%) of fasting blood glucose level after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment 10.12% and 17.4%, respectively, compared to baseline value and to placebo group at corresponding duration.

Post-RT evaluations are demonstrated in ( Table 4 ), A highly significant improvement in the IPSS was observed, with a reduction in the median score from 11 to 5 ( p < 0.001).

Mean difference in swelling was highly significant after 24 h ( P = 0.001) and 72 h ( P = 0.0001) and on the seventh post-operative day ( P = 0.047).

Number of leaves Highly significant ( P < 0.001) variation was observed in the number of leaves in the untreated control and 13 purslane accessions.

The reduction involved both the ipsilateral and the contralateral eyes relative to the lesion, with highly significant differences (i.e., p < 0.001 in several studies) [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].

The three remaining predictors were highly significant (p < 0.001 for each parameter) and had regression coefficients comparable to those in the main model (surgical complications: 1.574 vs. 1.694; immediate urine production: −2.049 vs. −2.408; rate of change in serum creatinine: 0.233 vs. 0.233).

There were three levels of statistical significance: p < 0.05 (significant), p < 0.01 (highly significant), and p < 0.001 (extremely significant).

Differences between the two groups were highly significant (P<0.001).

The differences in mean surface roughness values between chlorhexidine and coffee were highly significant (p-value<0.001) irrespective of the composite used.

Most interestingly, the M1-like CD14 dim CD16 + monocytes, showed a strong and highly significant reduction (p < 0.001) in the T2D patients compared to the healthy subjects (30 ± 2 vs 44 ± 3/μl respectively) (Fig. 4 d).

From the first session onward, significant differences began to emerge ( P = 0.016 for air blast; P = 0.038 for tactile), becoming highly significant in subsequent sessions ( P < 0.001).

This remarkable increase was quantitatively confirmed by a highly significant rise ( p < 0.001) in the fluorescence intensity of 2,7-DCFH-DA, a ROS-sensitive fluorescent probe.

When the parameter numbers between two models differed by 1, if ΔOFV >3.84, there was a significant difference ( P < 0.05); if ΔOFV >10.83, there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

The results showed that tobacco leaves from different regions in China exhibited highly significant differences in chemical composition (p-value ≤ 0.001), which may be attributed to the unique geographical locations and climatic conditions of each production area.

For breast cancer, the optimal ARIMAX model (0,0,1) identified a positive and highly significant association with PC1 at a lag of 18 years (β = 0.108, p < 0.001).