The difference between the groups was highly significant (two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum [Mann-Whitney] test, p < 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The change in gingival index scores from baseline to second follow-up was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Besides, the effect of mimetic force on copresence is highly significant ( β = 0.630, p < 0.001), thereby supporting Hypothesis 4.
However, we note that when adding population‐specific πN/πS ratios as covariates to models of the effect of sex bias in gene expression on d XY (Figure 5 ), the effects of sex bias in gene expression remained highly significant ( p < .001 in all three cases).
The difference was highly significant (P<0.001).
Race interaction: highly significant (overall p < 0.001).
The statistical significance level was established as p ≤ 0.05 as significant, p ≤ 0.01 as highly significant, and p ≤ 0.001 as most significant. 3.
A highly significant correlation between AREG and EREG mRNA expression was observed (Spearman ρ 2 = 0.736, p<0.001 ).
The statistical analysis showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the two groups of cows for the intake of all individual FA and groups of FA from the diets.
As detailed in Table 2 , the Spearman Rank Correlation analyses between the HSCL-25 (psychological distress) at T2 and all continuous mental health instruments at T1 showed that all correlations were highly significant at p < 0.001, ranging from rho = 0.209 (OCD) to rho = 0.413 (SDQ Internalizing problems) and rho = 0.441 (SMFQ depressive symptoms).
However, the evolution with time revealed a very highly significant linear increase ( p < 0.001).
When PTM-mediated direct model was used, the overlaps between the observed DEGs and the expected targets of SNF1 were highly significant (Table 1 , p-value<=0.001), while the number of the overlap was 0 (p-value=1) when other models were used.
Overall, the difference in tenure is highly significant (chi-square 480, p = 0.001) and lends support to the findings of Stebbing and Spies-Butcher (2016) concerning the high levels of outright homeownership in the older age cohort.
3.2 Correlations between environments and variables In the DH population, the correlation between environments for GLS DS was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
When relating extraction times to particle size distribution, a highly significant positive association was found with Q 100μm (p < 0.001).
The difference in acquisition time between both sequences was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
For all four genes, in most cases allele frequencies in the feral populations differed significantly (p ≤ 0.025) from the frequencies in the reference flocks, most of the differences being highly significant (p < 0.001).
Compared to untreated cells, BC cells treated with CI-994 or MS-275 show a highly significant (p < 0.001) increase of NIS transcript, whereas AR-42 and chidamide drug treatment shows either low or non-significant increase of NIS transcript, respectively ( Figure 2 A).
The difference between the urge in the two conditions was highly significant ( t (20) = -10.901, p < 0.001).
In ferret tracheae, we found the effect of metachrony on MCT to be highly significant even when controlled for CBF and ASL ( P < 0.001, Table 2 ).
The increase was highly significant in the multivariate analysis for both stoves ( p < 0.001).
Variability in EI according to age, activity, educational status, SES, social background, and BMI status also showed highly significant variability (P<0.001).
The correlation between pairwise distance and phonological overlap was highly significant (given the large number of word pairs: r = -.25, p < .001) and was strong even among words with 4 or fewer shared onset phonemes ( r = -.25, p < .001).
Statistical analysis of susceptibility tests revealed that insecticide type was the primary determinant of mortality, with a highly significant main effect ( F (3,49) = 46.74, p < 0.001).
Although most neurons that encoded stimulus did not encode context (524 of 597), the fraction that did or that exhibited an interaction was still highly significant in two-sided binomial tests: out of the 597 neurons with a main effect of stimulus, 73 also showed a main effect of question with P < 0.001 (12.23%; P < 2.225 × 10 −308 ) and 31 an interaction with P < 0.001 (5.19%; P < 2.225 × 10 −308 ).