“highly significant”

The values increased to 2.38 /ml with standard deviation of 2.64 after supplementation, indicating highly significant increment ( P -value < 0.001) [ Table 2 and Figure 2 ].

The difference between shear bond strength among all groups was found to be statistically highly significant using one-way ANOVA test ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].

The combined ANOVA in the present study showed highly significant (P < 0.001) differences among sorghum genotypes, test environments, and G×E effects.

The values of NUE at Darien showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation with SNF traits corresponding to %Ndfa_Sh, %Ndfa_Sd, TNdfa_Sh, TNdfa_Sd (Table 4 ).

This difference (about 302.6 min) was highly significant ( P < 0.001) statistically as well as clinically [ Table 4 and Figure 1 ].

Presence of step parents and substance use in the family was seen to be a risk factor for substance abuse and the association was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

GraphPad Prism 9.5 software was used for plotting, and statistical significance was expressed as * p ≤ 0.05, indicating significance; ** p ≤ 0.01, highly significant; *** p ≤ 0.001, extremely significant; **** p ≤ 0.0001; ns, there is no significant difference. 5.

The results of the frailty model including all 81 subtypes simplified the risk into low and high risks, which were statistically highly significant, p < 0.001 (Fig. 8 A).

The final model was highly significant, F(12, 255) = 68.41, p < 0.001, explaining 76.4% of the total variance (R 2 = 0.764).

A paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test (testing whether pre-exercise scores exceeded post-exercise scores) was highly significant (W = 10 585, P < 0.001; Table 2 ).

The regression model was highly significant, p <0.001.

Changes in maximal arm muscle strength after suggestion Version A to gain informed consent after risk information, taken from every day clinical practice and suspected to be negative, resulted in a highly significant reduction of maximal arm muscle strength at both time points, namely by 16.9% at T1 and by 15.7% at T2 compared to baseline, respectively ( p < 0.001).

Statistical versus practical significance: As noted in Table 2 , the p-values for pre- and post-event comparisons of all subgroups, as well as the overall population, were highly significant (p < 0.001), which may reflect large sample sizes and/or meaningful shifts [ 50 ].

Results indicated that the activities of all antioxidant enzymes and their corresponding transcripts underwent highly significant decreases and downregulation in EcV-treated cultures (0.5 μg/ml medium for 4 h) compared to venom-free controls (P<0.001).

Fresh mass showed a highly significant difference between low N and high N ( P -value <0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed between low N and high N for dry mass ( Table 1 ).

Interestingly, a highly significant difference was observed in the expression of GFAP in both STR ( p < 0.001) and HIPP (p < 0.001), suggesting the activation of astrocytes in the MPTP group (Figure 5A,B ).

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were determined in concentration, type of solvent, and extraction time regarding Ae. aegypti mortality for the two species.

Interpopulation analysis and nesting habitat analysis F ST, Φ ST , and the AMOVA showed highly significant ( P < 0.001) structure among the four main rookeries included in our interpopulation analysis (Table 2 ).

A significantly higher proportion (112; 88%) belonged to laborer categories (skilled/unskilled/Agriculture labor) when compared to other occupations (small or large business, private or government services) [16; 12%] with this difference is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Using this approach, we found that depletion of WAVE2 from EC monolayers decreased the frequency of transcellular TEM events to 51% of the value seen with control EC monolayers; the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001; Figure 3B ).

Factor loading coefficient analysis The analysis results of the factor loading coefficient table show that all measured variables have highly significant loadings on their corresponding latent variables ( P < 0.001), indicating that the scale has ideal convergent validity.

Behavioral data analysis Behavioral analyses demonstrated systematic variations across occlusion levels, with repeated-measures ANOVAs (Greenhouse-Geisser corrected) revealing highly significant main effects on all measured parameters: NASA-TLX scores (F(2,128) = 38.40, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.375), recognition accuracy (F(2,128) = 616.95, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.906), and reaction time (F(2,128) = 244.43, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.792) (Fig. 8 ).

For colony A, the difference in mortality was highly significant between strains 119 and 49.3 (log‐rank test, p < .001) but not for colony B (log‐rank test, p = .017, Bonferroni adjusted significance level: p < .016) (Figure 1 ).

Highly significant correlations (p < 0,001) with serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were found at any time points Table 5 .

The effect of W level on tomato WUE was highly significant (P<0.001, Table 1 ).