“highly significant”

Known-groups validity All known-group difference analyses of MDF-Fibro-17scores were highly significant ( p < 0.001) when performed using quintiles.

Changes in tank pH over 3 d indicated that the difference between FC‐treated plants and control plants due to treatment was highly significant (Figure 7 ; Friedman repeated measures ANOVA on ranks, q = 29.431, df = 1, P < 0.001).

The differences between the SARIFA-positive invasion front adipocyte areas were highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 5 ).

The likelihood-ratio test for nonlinearity was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Differences between groups were analyzed using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, with statistical significance defined as * p < 0.05 (significant), ** p < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** p < 0.001 (very significant).

P < 0.01 was marked as a highly significant difference, and P < 0.001 was marked as a highly significant difference.

Differences between mutants and control are highly significant by ANOVA two-tailed Tukey-Kramer approach for multiple comparisons (***, p<0.001).

All predictors were highly significant ( p < 0.001), with negative coefficients for slope ( β = −0.0506, z = −4662.38), human modification (HMI; β = −20.37, z = −159.41), and distance to water ( β = −0.0001138, z = −132.22).

A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), a P value of <0.01 was considered highly significant (**), and a P value of <0.001 was considered strongly significant (***).

Results The ANCOVA model with the increasing rate of body temperature at the beginning of the heating experiments (coefficient c of the exponential function relating temperature to time) was highly significant ( F 30,211 = 32.42, P < 0.001; R 2 = 0.822; Table 2 ).

* p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant, ** p ≤ 0.01 very significant, *** p ≤ 0.005 highly significant and **** p ≤ 0.001 most significant.

The preoperative mean ± SD was 78.18 ± 13.12, which decreased to 57.88 ± 24.04 postoperatively, with a mean difference of 20.30; this difference was highly significant (P < 0.001) and exceeded the MCID threshold.

The result was highly significant— F (16.02, 4236.45) = 81.65, p < 0.001, with Greenhouse-Geiser correction for violations of sphericity.

The analysis revealed a highly significant time main effect (F (9,864) = 23.935, p < 0.001, η2 p = 0.2), confirming the expected post-spinal hemodynamic trajectory common to all groups.

Statistical significance, assessed with the cor.test() function (based on the Fisher transformation), confirmed that all correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Importantly, all factor loadings for the latent variables were highly significant at the p < 0.001 level, ranging from 0.502 to 0.874.

All tests were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Difference in survival between the genotypes (R) and (S) in the deltamethrin treated group was highly significant (Pearson’s chi squared; p<0.001, Table 5 ).

After incubation for 72 h, a dose-dependent increase in ARPE-19-LGALS1 −/− cell proliferation was observed, which was most pronounced and highly significant following incubation with 100 ng/mL hr-galectin-1 (83.6 ± 2.3%; p < 0.001) when compared to untreated galectin-1-deficient ARPE-19 cells (65.8 ± 0.8%; Figure 3 B).

Comparison of high‐ and low‐ITH groups revealed significant differences in KEGG scores for 126 pathways ( p < 0.05), of which 89 were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Among F 3 plants, highly significant ( P < 0.001) segregation distortion against the homozygous inducer genotype was observed for the qhir11 sub-region (Table 2 ).

The difference between groups was highly significant ( P <.001).

The number of lesions (≥3) was associated with an approximately 1087% increase in the risk of related events (HR = 11.87, 95% CI = 3.29–42.78), with highly significant statistical results ( P < .001).

The main effect of group was highly significant, F (1108) = 335.157, P < .001, with a very large effect size ( = 0.756).

In addition, there is a highly significant correlation between the mean read abundances of the shared MOTUs in the two types of samples (Pearson’s r = 0.766, p < 0.001) ( Figure S3 ).