When combining all three experiments, the difference in proportion becomes highly significant ( P < 0.001), with the cerebral regions of interest hosting significant voxels in a larger proportion of participants than the cerebellar regions of interest.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
A highly significant difference was found between the CHX and the NS group ( P = 0.001) and between the HEX group and NS group ( P = 0.001) regarding the isolation of oropharyngeal Gram-negative microorganisms ( Table 4 ).
UVA alone, RF alone, and the combination of RF and consecutive UVA irradiation show a highly significant trend toward reduced cell viability (all P < 0.001). β-Coefficients for UVA irradiation, RF concentration, and their interaction term are −29.3% per mW/cm 2 UVA, −605.2% per % RF, and −1206.9% per mW/cm 2 UVA * % RF, respectively.
In parallel, there were also highly significant ( p < 0.001, mean difference 6.7, 95%CI =+ 5.6 + 7.8) changes in total physical activity levels.
Foveal width was the only parameter where diagnosis of ROP had a significant effect, with a highly significant interaction between absence/presence of ROP and PMA ( P < 0.001).
RFV had highly significant negative correlations with ADF, CPY, and NDF ( r = –0.72, –0.66, and –0.89; p <0.001), and CPY had highly significant positive correlations with NDF ( r = 0.68).
The frequency that colonies were fed was highly significant, with only colonies fed every other week suffering reduced growth relative to the other two treatment levels ( p < .001 in both post hoc comparisons).
All groups succeeded in restoring sufficient vitamin D status except the deficient SCD group with a median level of 25.5 (20.5–34) at 6-month post-intervention; however, there was a highly significant improvement from baseline levels ( P < 0.001).
In NAF condition, there was a highly significant negative association between k values and the mean of the absolute values of ΔF2 for each PWS and each place of articulation ( r = −0.636, p < 0.001 for Pearson product-moment uncorrected scores, based on 63 observations).
The analysis revealed that the intercept was highly significant ( p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.999), indicating that almost all variations in motor development scores are explained by the model.
In non-parametric testing, the difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all conventional retinal imaging modalities: NIR, GAF, BAF and multicolor imaging.
The remaining items presented highly significant p values (p≤0.001), as shown in table 1 .
All factors were highly significant ( P < 0.001), except the interaction between Stage and Trait.
Concerning organic acids, the lactic acid content showed a highly significant positive correlation with Enterococcus when exposed for 3 d after 3 d of fermentation ( p < 0.001), and it showed an incredibly significant positive correlation with Lactobacillus for 1 d of exposure after 30 d of fermentation ( p < 0.01).
The full model was highly significant (F 12.612 = 28.565, p < 0.001; with an R 2 = 0.36).
Additionally, there was a highly significant association between the occurrence of malignancy and age in anti-TIF1-γ positive IIM patients (p < 0.001) (data not shown).
The analysis of variance confirms that this is highly significant both combined (p < 0.001) and individually ( Table 4 ).
The mean PLR was higher in OSCC cases with or without occult LNM in comparison to controls and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
+ β 2 Y e a r t + β 3 S a l e s R a n k i t * Y e a r t + β 4 G r o c e r y i t + β 5 P r i c e i t + β 6 F e a t u r e i t + β 7 D i s p l a y i t + α 1 : 31 C a t e g o r y c + ε i t The empirical results (see Table 4 ) strongly support the model free evidence as there are positive and highly significant (p < .001) interaction effects between sales rank and year in all three model specifications.
Highly significant ( P < 0.001) impacts were recorded due to supplementary inclusion on crude protein intake values.
For all analyses, p value < 0.05 was considered significant (*), representing p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), and p < 0.001/ p < 0.0001 as extremely significant (***/****). 5.
While our findings were highly significant ( P < .001 for pTT-TG and dTT-TG), the correlation was weak to moderate ( r = –0.40 for pTT-TG and r = –0.593 for dTT-TG).
Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference in both factors (“group” and “time”) (p<0.001).
Highly significant correlations between malignancy ( p < 0.001) and transplant ( p < 0.009) and death were found, with odds ratios (ORs) of sixteen for malignancy and an OR = 8 for transplant.
As observed in Figure 4B , there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) improvement in skin elasticity (21.54%) and firmness (27.18%) after using the supplement for 12 weeks.