“highly significant”

For all statistical analyses, P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, P <0.01 was highly significant, and P <0.001 was considered statistically very highly significant.

p <0.05 is considered significant; p <0.01 is considered highly significant; and p <0.001 is considered extremely significant.

An example of a highly significant d-colocalized pair is THBS1-COL5A1 , which appears as a proximal pair (PP test p-value < 0.001, at d = 4 μm) in ~67% of the 3,147 cells where both genes were detected (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).

There was only a small decrease in the magnitude of the association between the FPDS and the mean WDDS-10 (from β = 0.10 to β = 0.09), but the association remained highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 3 , B models).

We also observe that among models with high R 2 (presumed to be well modeled based on the training data), we see highly significant correlation of imputed and measured expression, with a substantial number of genes with correlation P < 1e-3 ( Supplementary Material, Fig.

This difference in yield is very highly significant (P< 0.001).

Moreover, in all types of polyps, significant differences between the types of epithelium were detected in our study in hyperplastic polyps (P=0.025) and highly significant differences in allergic and fibroinflammatory polyps (P<0.001).

The overall change in knowledge regarding causation was highly significant (χ 2 = 139.48, p < 0.001) with a large effect size (V = 0.440), suggesting a substantial improvement in understanding.

Filtered water was highly significant with Hepatitis A with P -value of <.001.

Our results showed that the relationship between the field measured defoliation and through UAS multispectral images with ITDe or MCDe was highly significant (p-value<0.001), and that the model’s predictive accuracy was very high in both cases (R 2 = 0.91 for ITDe and R 2 = 0.93 for MCDe). 4.

In both cases, the difference in survival is highly significant (p<0.001, one-side log rank test).

The difference between the mean bleeding time after placebo and after aspirin was highly significant (p < 0.001) [ 20 ].

Highly significant correlations were found between the atherosclerotic plaque and hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and diabetes (in each case p < 0.001).

All differences were highly significant (p < 0.001).

Remarkably, when comparing the fraction of significant and nonsignificant ORFs within CiCo with the two control datasets, we found highly significant differences with both (chi-squared test, two-tailed P -value < 0.001) ( Fig 3B , right) suggesting that the coding potential of CiCo is not only an inherited feature resulting from their origin from coding genes but might potentially account for their function.

Alexithymia: In both models, alexithymia significantly predicts IAD, with coefficients of β = 0.27 (Model 1) and β = 0.26 (Model 2), both highly significant ( p < 0.001).

We observed a strong and highly significant differentiation at locus EFbis (F ST = 0.255, Fisher exact test: P < 0.001) while the other ten loci exhibited very low and non-significant levels of differentiation.

Statistical analysis has shown highly significant differences (p < 0.001) between the net O.D. of placentae from normal pregnancies and the placentae of mothers with gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and drug abusers.

All differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The results show that STGCN-ViT corrects a statistically significant number of classification errors made by CNN and transformer-based models, with all CNN comparisons generating highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant interactions of the variable “measurement point at the palate (P1-P88)” with the variable “sex” - F(9.88) = 2.976, p = 0.001 - as well as the variable “age group” - F(29.641) = 2.839, p < 0.001 - were found.

An unpaired t-test showed a highly significant difference (t = -172.36, p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference in Breg cells between SLE and APS patients with subclinical atherosclerosis and controls (P= 0.001, 0.005).

This difference between the groups was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) and applied for all individual PCB congeners on a wet weight basis.

P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), P < 0.01 as highly significant (**), P < 0.001 as extremely significant (***), and ns as not significant.