“highly significant”

The full factorial ANOVA identified a highly significant (p<0.001) effect of the factors “material”, “time” and “curing mode (“low”, “soft“, „high”) for the light-cured materials Beautifil II, Fuji II LC and Photac Fil Quick.

Pairwise comparison (Tukey’s post hoc test) Group 1 showed a highly significant difference when compared with all other groups at 1 and 2 weeks ( P < 0.001) and a significant difference with Groups 2, 3, and 5 at 4 weeks.

Repeated measures of one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) among these distinct zones.

Across the four datasets, the association was similarly strong ( r ≥ 0.80) and highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a sharp increase in the number of actual barriers displayed starting already for cases with 1–2 functional limitations.

Plant assemblages of all microhabitats displayed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

left) is 0.020, meaning the right hemisphere showed higher DVR values, and the difference was statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).

Regarding the accuracy for clinical images by body site, the results of the Mann-Whitney U Tests show that the differences are not significant for the Monk Scale ( p = 0.448) while being highly significant for the Fitzpatrick Scale ( p < 0.001).

We found no significant associations between sputum cytokines or chemokine levels and dFEV 1 but correlation between log-transformed IL8 and log-transformed number of sputum neutrophils were highly significant ( p -value < 0.001).

Over all loci, departure from Hardy Weinberg equilibrium was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), reflecting the deviation in the direction of heterozygote deficit.

A significantly lower proportion of diabetics (40 individuals; 20%) engaged in moderate physical activity three to four days a week compared to non-diabetics (80 individuals; 36%), which was highly significant (p < 0.001).

A highly significant association was also found between the change in axial length over time and the changes in choroidal luminal thickness ( P < 0.001, β = −17.8 μm/ mm, 95% CI = −26.5 to −9.1 μm/ mm) and with the changes in stromal thickness over time ( P < 0.001, β = −16.0 μm/ mm, 95% CI = −22.7 to −9.2 μm/ mm; Fig. 8 ).

The need for full prosthesis was seen only among 2 (0.50%) subjects and the findings were statistically highly significant (p<0.001).

Males accounted for 81.4% of the conflict-related deaths (CI 95%: 77.3–85.2%) and the difference between the sexes was highly significant (p < 0.001).

There was a significant effect of treatment ( F 2,234 = 4.78, p = 0.139) and an interaction of treatment and time ( F 12,234 = 3.67, p < 0.0001) and Bonferroni post hoc comparison showed a highly significant difference between ME7 + LPS + IL-1RA and ME7 + LPS + veh at 5 h ( p < 0.001).

When analysed using a stratified log rank test, the predatory bacteria provided a highly significant (p < 0.001) protective effect from a lethal challenge of Y. pestis CO92 pGEN-luxCDABE.

The level of significance was expressed as significant at p < 0.05 (*) and highly significant at p < 0.001 (**).

There was a highly significant difference in symptom scores between women and men: Mean PAGI-SYM and GCSI was, respectively, 3.10 and 3.36 in women, 2.22 and 2.37 in men (both P ≤0.001).

Eissa et al 31 found that RANTES was significantly increased in breast cancer cases with no metastasis compared to the control group ( p <0.05) and a highly significant increase in metastatic patients compared to controls ( p <0.001).

TSPO Gene Expression Level Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in TSPO gene expression in CRC tumor samples compared to normal tissue samples ( p < 0.001).

However, this decrease was progressive as loss of claudin-3 in all stages of CRC ( versus normal mucosa) was highly significant (p<0.001) ( Fig-2A ).

The difference in proliferation between C4.L8.5 cells incu- bated in the presenceor absenceof NMA was highly significant (p<0.001).

The overall correlation was highly significant ( r = 0.904, p <0.001, Fig 3 ).

Statistically significant differences are denoted by * with a probability value ( p ) of <0.05, ** with p < 0.01, and highly significant differences by *** with p < 0.001 and **** with p < 0.0001. 3.

Directional consistency of each agonistic behavior All groups showed highly significant directionally consistent behavior for all behaviors (all p < 0.001).

Hierarchical AMOVA analyses among all populations further confirmed that highly significant proportions of genetic variation are partitioned between islands (1.5%; p < 0.001) and among populations on Guam (1.4%; p < 0.001; Table S6 ).