STZ in Group III produced a highly significant reduction in the relative weight of the testes, prostate, and seminal vesicles compared with untreated control rats (Group I) ( p < .001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
As expected, highly significant differences were observed in cortical regions ( p < 0.001) when comparing 18 F-Flut(+) and 18 F-Flut(–).
The two crucial periodontal clinical indicators, namely PPD and CAL, showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive correlation in both study groups.
The difference between glypican-1 expression of the two tumor types was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).
This decrease occurred along a significantly different curve shape for dark- medium- and light-colored honeys as shown by a highly significant interaction between color and dilution ( p < 0.001).
The relative mRNA levels of EZH2 were highly significant in cancer tissues compared to normal tissues ( P <0.001).
Randomization testing showed that the increase in average correlation after BMR was highly significant (Effect size = 0.057; p < 0.001).
There is a highly significant difference in cell number in the mature spur at the species level ( W = 73; P < 0.001) and at the level of developmental stage ( χ 2 = 21.99; d.f. 4; P < 0.001) ( Fig. 4C , D ).
In particular, highly significant (P < 0.001) differences in both POD and CAT activities were observed between the two genotypes.
Intraindividual differences in both BMI and V VAT-T were highly significant (p<0.001).
The radiological outcomes of femur union in the study reveal a substantial difference between open and closed injuries, supported by a highly significant p-value of <0.001.
The effects of single injections of 1 and 3 mg/kg JMV2959 administered after 2 mg/kg methamphetamine-CPP conditioning were highly significant: F2,21 = 29.38, p < 0.001 (see the Figure 1 ).
[ 25 ], with the cohort design, the recalculated ES was 1.01 (95% CI 1.007–1.023) with a highly significant association between trunk fat mass and PWV ( P < 0.001).
In contrast to the scoring by individual judges, the distribution of scores for individual dreams was highly significant ( χ 2 = 56.1, df = 19, p < .001, w = 1.67), with the actual scores skewed towards better than chance accuracy ( Figure 1 ).
The differences between treatment groups were highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.3.6.
The model demonstrates high explanatory power (adjusted R 2 = 0.90 and deviance explained = 92.3%) with highly significant effects ( p < 0.001), and diagnostic plots show good model fit and residual behaviour (Fig.
There was also a highly significant correlation between the EPG obtained using Mini-FLOTAC with the raw egg counts obtained by semi-quantitative flotation ( r = 0.432, P < 0.001), but the correlation was much weaker than for Mini-FLOTAC and McMaster.
Two different clustering methods, (Jaccard, which incorporates only presence/absence of OTUs, and Bray Curtis, which also incorporates proportional abundances of each OTU when comparing dissimilarities) revealed a highly significant effect of diet ( P < 0.001).
Age remains a highly significant predictor for hypertension (OR = 1.83, p < 0.001), while gender exhibits a minor protective effect for females compared to males, although this association does not reach statistical significance (OR = 0.96, p = 0.063).
There was a highly significant variation (p = 0.001) between body condition score and infection rate of intestinal nematodes [ Table 2 ].
The overall model was highly significant ( F 1,12 = 59.3, P < 0.001), with size class ( F 2,71 = 83.0, P < 0.001), time ( F 1,71 = 24.9, P < 0.001) and temperature ( F 1,71 = 133.0, P < 0.001) being individually significant factors.
A comparison of the children’s observed cycling skills at the end of the course before and after the cycle training showed a highly significant improvement in mean performance scores from M before = 1.77 to M after =1.36 (paired t -test, t = −6.992, p < 0.001, n = 147) ( Appendix A , Table A3 ).
* p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, highly significant; *** p < 0.001, very significant. 3.
○ Male (χ 2 = 79.939, df = 4, p < 0.001): the social status distribution is also significantly different among male patients, with a highly significant p -value. - Marital Status ○ Female (χ 2 = 15.643, df = 2, p < 0.001): marital status is significantly associated with gender, indicating differences in marital status distribution among females. ○ Male (χ 2 = 110.899, df = 3, p < 0.001): marital status shows a strong association with gender in mal
The statistically highly significant value of P < 0.001 indicates that the concentration of pilocarpine administered has an impact on the pupil size.