“highly significant”

In the case of DNA3–SWCNT with 5‐HT, responses were highly significant (p < 0.001) for all concentrations and cycles in both normalization schemes, except the second cycle at 1 μ m when using I 0 (Figure 4C ; Figure S10C ).

The results of the study indicate that the intervention had a highly significant and substantial effect on agility performance; the high level of significance of the group × time interaction ( p < 0.001) and large effect size (η p 2 = 0.512) clearly demonstrate the intervention-specific effect of the marked reduction in IA duration observed in the experimental group (F = 23.056, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.512).

Between 2022 and 2023, both genders also showed highly significant increases ( P < 0.001) in weight, BMI, vital capacity, and pull-ups/sit-ups.

A Kruskal-Wallis test showed that this association between morning stiffness and AJC is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Those having financial constrain had highly significant low score ( p < 0.001) in the environmental and psychological domain and mildly significant low score ( p = 0.037) in the physical domain ( Table 15 ).

Several regression models yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.001), indicating that increases in PM 2.5 directly predicted higher pneumonia incidence.

Understanding of the term “genetic risk” was also significantly related to a participant's history of genetic disorders (p = 0.004), and previous genetic screening also showed a highly significant association with a history of genetic disorders (p < 0.001).

32.86 ± 15.93) were highly significant ( p values = .001 for all comparisons).

A highly significant association was observed between health insurance coverage and cancer stage (χ 2 = 47.646, p = 0.001), as the majority of women without health insurance were diagnosed at advanced stages, particularly Stage IV.

T-TEER yielded a highly significant improvement in TR severity at discharge (P<0.001), which persisted at 3-month and 12-month follow-up (both P<0.001).

In Shams et al, the differences were highly significant ( P < .001 for both CS and ASES), while Tanpowpong et al also observed significant improvements (CS: P = .02, ASES: P = .002).

A highly significant difference in B. coli infection prevalence was observed among the farms (χ 2 = 2502.00, p < 0.001). 3.2 Balantioides coli occurrence identified by first batch survey A total of 382 samples were collected to characterize the infection dynamics of B. coli , with an overall infection rate of 83.2%.

The repeated-measures ANCOVA showed a highly significant main effect of time ( p < 0.001, F = 12.867).

After adjusting for short-term acute fluctuations and clinical covariates, the RCS curve exhibited a highly significant non-linear risk-increasing trend (Total p < 0.001).

Discussion The results of this study demonstrated three key findings that advance the diagnostic landscape of MRI-negative FCD: firstly, the cortical thickness symmetry index (MeanThicknessDiff) exhibits a highly significant difference between MRI-negative FCD patients and healthy controls ( p < 0.001); secondly, the composite Voxel-Mirrored Structural Symmetry Index (VMSSI) is substantially elevated in MRI-negative FCD patients compared to matched controls ( p < 0.001); and thirdly, VMSSI achieves a robust diagnostic performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72–0.88), accompanied by 77% sensitivity and 85% specificity, outperforming single-feature analyses of either magnetic resonance signal intensity or cortical thickness symmetry.

Statistically significant comparisons were considered at p < 0.05, with exact p-values reported; for highly significant findings, p < 0.001 is indicated.

Additionally, 46.57% of patients in the PV group were HBeAg-positive, compared to 21.30% in the CVR group, a highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

Highly significant correlations (P< 0.001) were observed between the measured and predicted values for soil pH and the four physicochemical parameters (SOM, AN, AP, and AK), demonstrating the exceptional performance of the established models.

The spatial smoothing term was highly significant ( edf = 5.77, χ 2 = 331.4, p < 0.001), suggesting a strong spatial structure in outbreak patterns.

The one-way ANOVA shown in Table 4 revealed a highly significant difference in HXI scores between these groups (F (3, 98) = 126.18, p < 0.001).

A Welch two-sample t -test confirmed this difference was highly significant ( t = 20.91, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.20, 0.24]).

The analysis revealed a profound, highly significant proportional asymmetry between thickener types (McNemar's χ 2 = 50.57 ‬, p < 0.001), paired with a negative statistical agreement metric (κ = −0.1085).

The distribution of microbial isolates in corneal cultures showed a highly significant difference between the two study periods (χ 2 = 78.14, p < 0.001).

As shown in Table 3 , the increases in F1 scores for all three models reached a highly significant level ( p < 0.001).

The Mann–Whitney U test indicated that this difference was highly significant ( U = 18, Z = −12.6, p < 0.001), with a large effect size (rank‐biserial, r = 0.86).