“highly significant”

The epicardial adipose tissue measurement, according to the Iacobelli method and the indexed epicardial adipose tissue thickness ( Figure 1 ), both showed a highly significant correlation with the EAT ROS levels ( p -value < 0.001), indicating that greater epicardial adipose tissue thickness is associated with increased oxidative stress in epicardial adipose tissue ( Table 3 ).

5-HT enhanced the maximum anti-tumour response to the DMXAA/CI- 1010 combination; the effect of 5-HT was statistically significant in one of the two experiments, and was highly significant (P=0.001) if both experiments were pooled.

In both cases, the LRTs were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Results Our results showed highly significant increase in the level of lipid peroxidation in group IV when com pared to the control group, group II and group III (p<0.001).

Despite this lateral bias, there was nevertheless a highly significant relationship between brightness condition and arrival side ( χ 2 (3) = 154.63, p < 0.001), with the birds switching their preferred arrival side from right to left when the background was bright to the left ( table 1 ; figure 1 e ).

There were highly significant differences in food and water intake between the NC and diabetic rats (p < 0.001).

Analysis of variance revealed that the environment had a highly significant effect on the GI of the WJ RIL population (F = 25.019, P < 0.001), whereas no significant environmental difference was observed on the GI of the WZ RIL population ( Table 4 ). 3.3 Allelic variation of TaMFT-3A and TaMKK3-4A in the two RIL populations KASP markers were used to detect the genotypes of TaMFT-3A and TaMKK3-4A to determine the distribution frequencies of the different SNP loci in the two RIL populations ( Figure 3 ).

However, initial marker concentrations of HCG and/or AFP > 1000 IU l(-1) were highly significant prognosticators for treatment failure (P=0.001 and P < 0.001 respectively), independent of half-life values.

The results of ANOVA showed highly significant differences in the biomass values among the seasons (df = 2; F = 14.771; p = 0.001).

This difference is highly significant, t (3700) = 63.1, p < 0.001, d = 3.5 indicating that this cut off strongly separates people who endorse positive play from those who do not.

Statistical comparison of the observed and expected additive toxicities, Regarding the difference in toxicity units (TU), using the Student t test, it was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Larvae fed South African Bt maize had much higher survival (about 80%) than larvae fed Spanish Bt maize (below 40%) ( Figure 2 , left panel), the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001, coxph test).

Hence, SP-7, with a pH of 7.2 ± 0.1, had a trend for higher values than CON-0 ( p = 0.07), CIDR-7 ( p < 0.05) and CIDR-14 ( p = 0.05), while the differences were highly significant when assessing the SP-14 group, with a pH of 8.0 ± 0.2, against SP-7 ( p < 0.001) and CON-0, CIDR-7 and CIDR-14 ( p < 0.00001 for all).

The mean deviation of surface roughness SMD gets highly significant correlation value ( p < 0.001) to tensile properties.

The model also returned highly significant results with a positive correlation ( p < 0.001) for the number of microplastics per kilogram of sediment but there was no significant result for grams of microplastic in kilograms of the same medium ( p = 0.683).

In all cases, differences are significant for P < 0.05, very significant for P < 0.01, highly significant for P < 0.001, and extremely significant for P < 0.0001.

These simulations imply that the observed likelihood ratio (−2ΔL = 15,156) is highly significant ( p << 0.001).

A regression analysis with task (ER vs S) as independent factor and A ROC values as dependent variable showed a highly significant main effect of task (ER vs S; F = 14.33, P < 0.001; F = 4.20, P = 0.002, corrected for performance as indexed by percent correct for each task).

The influence of the genotype factor on the degree of migration was highly significant, as revealed by two-way ANOVA ( F (1, 32) =55.842, p<0.001).

The difference in heart rate between control and lignocaine groups remains highly significant at all times of assessment ( P < 0.001).

Additionally, for the 10 years old trees, there was a highly significant difference ( p ≤ 0.001) in EAB under FW irrigation (Fig. 3 ).

There was highly significant difference in the mean values of SPO 2 , pulse rate, and PEFR between the test and control participants with P < 0.001.

The prediction accuracy is highly significant ( P -value <0.001, permutation testing), confirming that the temporal decoding variability effectively relates to behavior.

At 10 DAV, vaccinated groups 3 and 4 demonstrated highly significant differences in IgT greater than the control group by 74.68 ± 14.08- and 56.92 ± 16.64-fold, respectively ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 3 B).

A highly significant difference of the ES distributions between these two groups was observed ( p < 0.001).