“highly significant”

Regarding the fucoidan coating, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant effect of the polysaccharide: liposomes ratio on the ζ-potential ( p < 0.001).

When the six datasets were combined (n = 1334) (Figure 7K ), the positive association between Ran and VEGFR2 mRNA levels was highly significant (Pearson’s correlation 0.67, P < 0.001 ).

The LSD-Pla contrast GS beta map exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with the LSD-Pla contrast GBC map after GSR (r = 0.65, p<0.001), but a highly significant positive correlation before GSR (r = 0.66, p<0.001).

For all three responses, the rod-length configuration is the dominant and highly significant factor, explaining 41.6% of the variance for SEA (F = 109.6, p < 0.001), 83.2% for CFE IPCF (F = 1496.6, p < 0.001), and 59.2% for CFE PCF (F = 110.7, p < 0.001).

Lesion scores were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test in SPSS 27 software ( p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant, and p < 0.001 very highly significant). 3.

The Mann-Whitney test applied to compare the two groups produced a highly significant statistical difference (p-value < 0.001), suggesting that the proposed GO-evaluation framework is able to emphasize a significant improvement of performance of all the reliability indices in a network that is high quality and structurally resolved.

This elevation was highly significant ( p < 0.001) but moderately heterogeneous (I 2 ~52%), with larger case-control gaps in studies from regions with prevalent folate/B 12 deficiencies (e.g., South Asia).

The statistical analysis showed highly significant effects of extract type (F = 1069.930, p < 0.001), plant part (F = 691.704, p < 0.001), and their interaction (F = 225.165, p < 0.001) on total polyphenol content (TPC).

We observed a highly significant association ( p < 0.001 *) between SSFs’ bacterial contamination and the time of sample collection (90.0% of the samples collected in the afternoon, during the maximum workload of the SSFs, yielded bacterial growth).

Analysis of variance showed highly significant differences in the age of patients stratified according to the site of the tumour (F 3,1582 =6.7, p<0.001), and SNK range testing revealed this was due to the ‘Upper’ oesophagus group being significantly (p<0.05) different from all the other groups which were statistically indistinguishable—the identity difference is indicated in table 1 by the boxes around the median ages for each site group.

Catalase Activity Treatment group, exposure duration, and their interaction were all highly significant in the linear mixed-effect model (Treatment F(5,18.0) = 1209.715; Day F(2,180.0) = 1909.297; Treatment × Day F(10,180.0) = 126.643; all p < 0.001; Figure 1 ).

Overall, this resulted in a highly significant difference in LTP in control mice (F 1,13 = 120.105; p < 0.001, repeated measures (RM)-ANOVA) underlining an essential function of AMPK in long-term synaptic plasticity.

In addition, a highly significant negative correlation between wall thickness and ADC was observable in the ex vivo measurements (r = -0.615, p < 0.001).

One-way ANOVA indicated a highly significant difference in application time among experimental groups (F(3, 28) = 21.98, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.702).

Hazard ratios were highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating the risk of a severely dysplastic lesion developing carcinoma was 81.8 (95% CI 10.5, 635.9) times higher than for a non-dysplastic lesion (Table 4 ).

The administration of ONA was associated with highly significant increases in CSP end latency (CSPe), from 118.5 ± 9.1 ms to 130.7 ± 6.2 ms ( p < 0.001), CSP duration (CSPd), from 39.6 ± 5.9 ms to 50.9 ± 7.3 ms ( p < 0.001).

The combination of smoothing and temporal filtering showed the strongest effects in healthy populations, with highly significant deviations in the HCP cohort ( t = 8.35, P < 0.001) and in the HCs in the HX-DICS database ( t = −4.44, P < 0.001).

In conclusion, the authors found a highly significant association of fibrinolytic markers, endothelial markers, and levels of coagulation (fibrinogen with a weighted mean difference of 0.43 and P < .001) with AF in AF patients compared to SR patients. 33 Another study reported a significant difference in the prothrombotic state (irregularity of blood coagulation) when patients with permanent as well as paroxysmal AF were compared to those with persistent AF or SR controls.

Notably, chromosomal usage following treatment with pioglitazone or endiandrin A showed a moderately high correlation (r s = 0.66) and a high correlation with the FABP4 hi subset (r s = 0.74 and 0.88 respectively) all which were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

From A1 to A2, the IG lost 7.36 ± 7.09 kg, while the CG showed a small inverse change of -0.10 ± 7.33 kg, yielding a highly significant between-group difference (p = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.35), indicative of a large effect size.

Fluence exhibited a highly significant effect on the water contact angle (F = 88.63, p < 0.001), indicating a strong energy-driven transition in surface wettability.

Results In this study; the diabetic group showed statistically highly significant decrease in the average RV-GLS (−14.0 ± 6.9 in group 1 vs. −22.7 ± 2.5 in group 2, P < 0.001), significant decrease in RV S velocity (9.5 ± 2.2 in group 1 vs. 11.5 ± 1.8 in group 2, P < 0.05), significantly reduced E/A ratio (1.0 ± 0.2 in group 1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.1 in group 2, P < 0.05), and highly significant increased E/Em ratio (7.9 ± 3.2 in group 1 vs. 5.2 ± 0.7 in group 2, P < 0.001).

From 2009 to 2010, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the mean rate of hospitalizations for TB in the Centre and North subgroups vs. a significant ( P < 0.05) decrease in the East, South and South-West subgroups.

Having a prior mental health diagnosis, impairment, or firsthand experience in 2 or more traumatic events are highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) as lone predictors of the sleep period cluster.

2 , grain yield of the tested genotypes increased by a factor of 2.5 between 1915 and 2022 and the genotypic variability for yield was highly significant (F(13, 70) = 18.30, P < 0.001).