“highly significant”

405–1.710, P < 0.001), while the additional studies showed highly significant results (Hedges g = 1.619, 95% CI = 1.295–1.942, P < 0.001, Figure 4 ).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was 3.181425e-182, which is highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the variables were sufficiently correlated to justify the use of PCA.

When developmental temperature alone was included, the effect of this term was highly significant ( p < .001).

bursa-pastoris and parental species was positive and highly significant for all three tissues ( p < 0.001), and the slope was intermediate between what would be expected if there were either only cis -( β = 1) or only trans -regulatory ( β = 0) changes ( β = 0.37, 0.42 and 0.46, respectively for flowers, leaves and roots).

The line/vial random effect was highly significant (LRT: χ 2 2 = 480.89, P < 0.001).

The temporal AMOVA based on microsatellites revealed absence of genetic structure among the five temporal groups ( F CT = 0.10, P = 0.19), but a highly significant genetic structure within temporal groups ( F SC = 0.23, P < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

In each allogenic one-way MLC there is highly significant stimulation (P < 0.001) between any two of these four strains.

Red lines indicate highly significant correlations (P ≤ 0.001), yellow lines mean very significant correlations ( P ≤ 0.01), and green lines represent significant correlations ( P ≤ 0.05).

4 A reveals the catalase activity, and the increment observed for the binary mixture treated samples was highly significant with respect to pristine BNNPs counterparts (p < 0.001).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001; t test) perijunctional increase of 1.5–2-fold was seen for VGSCs, ankyrin G , and β-spectrin, but not for dystrophin (Fig. 9 ).

Analysis of variance using the statistical model Number of aphids = day + day × height + day × site(tree) + day × height × site(tree) + ε showed that the first order interaction of day with site was highly significant ( F 3,1504 = 27.76, P < 0.001), just as population differences among trees remained detectable after having accounted for time-dependent and site-dependent differences ( F 4,1504 = 13.92, P < 0.001).

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

There was no significant trend between amount of maternal smoking (six levels, nil to ? 40 cpd) and child- hood cancer risk (P = 0.91), whereas the corresponding trend for paternal smoking was highly significant (P < 0.001).

In addition, Bartlett's test of Sphericity was highly significant χ 2 (210) = 9628.310 ( p < 0.001) ( 27 ).

The comparison with the spontaneous survival time of the cats in the control group [mean survival time 0.8 ? 0.3 months (Table 1), with a maximal survival time of 1.5 months and a median survival time of 0.7 months] shows that the increase in lifespan of the treated cats is highly significant (F = 204 in the Fisher-Snedecor test; P << 0.001).

The effect of life cycle stage is highly significant based on a randomization of samples with respect to life cycle stages in RDA (pseudo-F = 17.6, p = 0.001).

When compared to the increase in trials with a single complex spike, this second protraction was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon-matched pairs test after Benjamini-Hochberg correction; S2D Fig ).

We found that all evaluated trauma score values for non-survivors were statistically highly significant for mortality (p<0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Highly significant differences were seen with respect to the intent of the burn, both intentional self-harm (M:F = 6.9 vs 19%, P < .001) and assault (M:F = 2.4 vs 8.7%, P < .001) were more prevalent for females ( Table 1 ).

All F ST were highly significant (P < 0.001) based on permutation test.

Figure 2 summarizes the abovementioned results, and the prevalence of OaPV1, OaPV2 and OaPV3 was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) compared to OaPV4 prevalence.

The results indicate that PH had a highly significant positive correlation with SD, NB, LL, LW, LEL, TLS, ST, SIL, and TNR at the P < 0.001 significance level and with NNS at P < 0.01 significance level ( Fig 2 ).

14 , and gave highly significant ( P < 0.001) rankings of: Fig. 13 > Fig. 11 > Fig. 14 .

Mortality and PH-severity showed a highly significant correlation at all examinations ( p = 0.001).

Student's pairwise t -test revealed that the differences in the average distances of the three pairs ( Figure 5d ) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).