2019 was 39% for consultations (from 37,590 to 22,908) and 49% for new referrals (from 4,490 to 2,271), with a highly significant median difference for both ( p < 0.001) ( Fig. 4 A,B).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
In case of six measurements— IMaF, PMaF, SMaC, IMaC, BMaC and IMeF, the gender differences were found to be very highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Subsequent MANOVA performed on this dataset revealed that our discriminant analysis was highly significant (Wilks Lambda = 0.017; F (2,32) = 66.3; p < 0.001).
A clear, highly significant delay-dependent decrement in the percentage preference for the large reinforcer was observed [Fig. 3 ; delay: F 4,60 =270.22, p < 0.001].
Similarly, there was a highly significant difference in the time until the next fever spike (F (2,131)=15.66, p<0.001).
ACOT8 expression showed significant differences ( p < 0.01), whereas HSD17B7 , OPN3 , DECR1 , PPARGC1A , SREBF2 , PECR , FABP3 , and PCTP demonstrated highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
These values showed a highly significant difference in epidermal thickness (Kruskal-Wallis test, χ 2 = 78.944, df = 4, p < 0.001; Fig. 4 A).
Cla at into group A (<20'!.) and group B (> 20% of cels staming postively for the p53 protein). Group B patents had a highly significant risk of proson (P<0.001, log-rank test).
To test for statistical significance, we ran a repeated measures analysis of variance, which showed a highly significant effect of condition, F (2,76) = 795.55, p < .001, n 2 = .954.
Higher prednisolone dose showed highly significant relationship with lower SDI score compared with patients on lower prednisolone dose (P < .001; 8.74 ± 10.89 mg vs 4.89 ± 3.81 mg), and such significant relationship was also observed for patients exposed to cyclophosphamide ( P = .004) (Table 3 ).
A highly significant difference (P<0.001, two-sided) in survivals was detected, favouring the treatment group.
The variation within the groups was statistically highly significant for the used stain ( F = 186.98, P ≤ 0.001).
Figure 2 summarizes the abovementioned results, and the prevalence of OaPV1, OaPV2 and OaPV3 was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) compared to OaPV4 prevalence.
When analyzed as Ischemia versus non-Ischemia, the difference remained highly significant (p<0.001).
We found a significant endophyte effect ( F 1,28 = 5.084, P = 0.032), a highly significant herbivore effect ( F 1,28 = 50.178, P < 0.001) and no significant interaction effect ( F 1,28 = 1.632, P = 0.212) on shoot fresh weight.
The mean difference of PI values at later appointments with respect to baseline value showed a highly significant increase ( P < 0.001).
Individual comparisons of Faces to each stimulus category (birds, cars, phones, and scrambled faces) revealed highly significant effects (all p < 0.001).
The results indicate that PH had a highly significant positive correlation with SD, NB, LL, LW, LEL, TLS, ST, SIL, and TNR at the P < 0.001 significance level and with NNS at P < 0.01 significance level ( Fig 2 ).
A two-way ANOVA found that fermentation time, pH and their associated interaction have a highly significant effect on both EA and ES (p<0.001).
The Mann-Whitney test demonstrated a highly significant difference in these salivary pH values ( P < 0.001).
The final results showed highly significant probability ( p < 0.001), with area under ROC curve of 0.913, negative predictive values of 89.7% (95% CI 10.3–100%), and a specificity of 78%.
These impressions were confirmed statistically, with a correlation analysis of the predicted and observed performance yielding highly significant effects both for the first-person perspective condition, r = .95, p<.001, and the third-person perspective condition, r = .94, p<.001.
Ten days after CABG surgery, however, we found highly significant differences ( Chi-square = 16.7, df = 3; p < 0.001).
While the spatial distribution of pH3 staining was comparable for both, wild type and transgenic embryos, a highly significant (p < 0.001) decrease of 25.5% in the number of replicating cells was observed for the Dmrt1bY:GFP protein expressing embryos (Fig. 4A and 4B ).
The chi-squared test for heterogeneity was highly significant (I 2 = 78.1%, P < 0.001).