“highly significant”

In the Wald Chi-square test, the global tests for the full model (including 26 covariates) were highly significant for all outcomes before PSM (Wald χ 2 = 79,669.454 for all-cause dementia, p < 0.001) and after PSM (Wald χ 2 = 32,255.940 for all-cause dementia, p < 0.001; Supplementary Tables 2, 3 ).

In the figure, the notations “NS,” and “*” represent no significant difference ( p > 0.05), significant difference ( p < 0.01), and highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

Supported hypotheses The path from Behavioral Intention (BI) to Usage Behavior (UB) was highly significant (β = 0.842, t = 18.065, p < 0.001), confirming the strong translation from AI nursing intention to actual usage behavior.

The mean rostrocaudal extent of the AC calculated from all animals in all groups was 1767 μm on the left and 1590 μm on the right hemisphere, leading to a highly significant difference (paired t -test, p < 0.001).

The Pearson correlation analysis also demonstrated a highly significant association between the ESBL phenotype and resistance to cephalosporins such as CRO (r = 0.886), FEP (r = 0.821), and CFX (r = 0.794), all with p < 0.001.

>60 years old) showed a change in DNA methylation levels of >15 % at only 75 CpG sites, none of which were highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 64 ].

This difference is highly significant (paired-sample t -test comparing log-thresholds for vertical corrugations versus horizontal corrugations, t [150] = 11.77, P < 0.001, or versus stereoacuity, t [148] = 10.87, P < 0.001, including only thresholds <1000 arcsec).

Highly significant correlations were found out between TP values and the amount of thickness reduction in all groups (r > 0.94, R 2 > 0.89, P < .001).

4 ). Immune cell count The results of lymphocyte formula show a highly significant increase in the total granulocytes in rats exposed to air jet stress (p < 0.001) compared with the intact group T.

Omitting the aberrant plot pair one, there was a highly significant negative effect of the icing treatment on flowering in 2014 (Wald statistic = 35.6, P < 0.001).

Correlations between TFAs and ADMA Bivariate and multivariate correlation analyses revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) and positive relationships between serum levels of TFAs and of the individual TFAs (both as wt% and concentration) and plasma ADMA levels (ρ = 0.12–0.22) (Table 2 ), and the GAM plot revealed no non-linear associations (data not shown).

3.3 Regression for RS contents, cooking quality and texture properties of glass noodles Quadratic models for the RS contents of uncooked and cooked glass noodles, along with cooking and texture properties, yielded regression coefficients that were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference in emergence rates between treatments ( χ 2 = 271.61, p < 0.001) (Figure 2 ).

Short‐stem hips had a small but nonsignificant difference in femoral antetorsion angles pre‐ and post‐operatively (1.8° ± 3.2°, p = 0.109), while the difference for conventional‐stem hips was much larger and highly significant (10.3° ± 5.8°, p < 0.001).

Between admission and discharge there was highly significant increase in all parameters of functional independence (FIM+FAM; p<0.001), with corresponding reduction in all parameters of dependency (NPDS/NPCNA; p<0.001).

The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.947, with a standard error of 0.022 and a highly significant P -value ( P < 0.001), indicating excellent discriminatory ability.

The canonical correlations of the Discriminant Function Analysis were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and 94.8% of the cells were correctly reclassified in the resulting clusters.

The AMOVA revealed that 38.8 % of the genetic variation was due to differences between populations, and the resulting F ST value was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In all strength-related rANCOVA models (bench press 1RM and squat 1RM), the baseline values were included as covariates and were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating a strong influence of initial performance level on the postintervention outcomes.

For the Chi-squared test, the results are considered significant when p (degree of significance) is less than 0.05, very significant when p < 0.01 and highly significant when p < 0.001.

However, a highly significant difference in mtDNA4977 copy levels was observed between the OAT groups compared to the control groups (P<0.001).

Highly significant differences (in each case p < 0.001) were noted for the categorical influence variables, i.e., ASA score, hernia size, EHS classification, and risk factors (Table 4 , 5 ).

Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (p < .001), signifying that the correlation matrix was not an identity matrix, and there were enough inter-correlations among the variables to justify factor analysis.

• Highly significant when the probability of error is <0.1% ( P < 0.001).

All these changes were highly significant ( p < 0.001).