“highly significant”

Housing condition was highly significant ( χ 2 = 241.32, p < 0.001), with higher infestation in poorly housed cattle (67.8%).

Results Combined analyses for traits recorded under stressful and non-stressful conditions Highly significant (p < 0.001) differences were detected among environments, hybrids, and parental lines for grain yield (GY), days to anthesis (DA), days to silking (DS), plant height (PH), and ear height (EH) across Striga-infested ( Table 1 ), Striga non-infested ( Table 2 ), and combined drought and heat stress (DHS) ( Table 3 ) conditions.

In agreement with this, we found a highly significant correlation between courtship display across years (2006 and 2007) (r = 0.76, p<0.001) for the 15 sires used here.

Statistical analysis confirmed that this reduction was highly significant [ t = 14.85, df = 199, paired t -test, P < 0.001; Table 1 ].

For the enterocyte area, the main effect of the apelin reached significance ( p = 0.019), while all other interaction and segment effects were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This inverse correlation was highly significant (χ 2 = 36; P <0.001).

The statistical analysis showed a highly significant effect of diet ( p < 0.001) and time ( p < 0.001), with no significant interaction, demonstrating that the superior feed efficiency of D2 was maintained consistently throughout the feeding period ( Figure 1 ).

activity (r) = -0.17 (N.S.) There is a highly significant correlation (r = 0.81, p<.001) between two values of platelet MAO activity for the whole group.

ANOVA confirmed a robust group effect, as post-hoc testing showed a highly significant impairment in LPS + Vehicle mice relative to both other groups (F(2,42) = 202.8; p < 0.001), with restoration of recognition memory following MSC treatment. 2.3.4.

Both groups had highly significant within-group improvement in MRMI, BBS and MBI ( p < 0 . 001 ).

This difference was found to be highly significant by chi squared analysis (p < 0.001).

Table S2 presents the results of the two-way ANOVA, revealing a highly significant effect ( p ≤ 0.001) of temperature, salinity, and their interaction on mycelial growth across all F. pseudograminearum isolates.

Also, 84% of the patients who got admitted in critically sick condition hailed from rural area, while only 16% of the population comprised urban society, which again turned out to be a highly significant value ( P < 0.001) on statistical analysis.

The difference in number of at birth immunization in pre and post JSY period was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

According to the logistic regression, ratio of BUC/ALN was highly significant for different factors including week-SI (odds ratio:−6.535, CI 0.000–0.016, P < 0.001), and medium SI (odds ratio: 9.135, CI 170.182–505386.699, P < 0.001).

Finally, the strong and highly significant results of the Mantel test within the C4 genetic cluster ( r = 0.785, P = 0.001) demonstrate the pattern of IBD also exists at a smaller scale for N. obscura ( Table 3 ).

Sensitivity analysis After controlling for within-patient correlation using linear mixed-effects models, the fixed effect of time point remained highly significant ( F = 118.93, P < 0.001).

In Penno et al.’s study, subjects with eGDR < 4.14 had a hypertension prevalence of 99.5%, subjects with eGDR value between 4.15 and 5.34 also had a hypertension prevalence of 98.7%, and subjects with eGDR ≥ 5.34 had a hypertension prevalence of 52.8% [ 11 ]; In their work, they also used euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp test to exam the correlation between eGDR and the level of measured glucose disposal rate, the results demonstrated that the correlation of eGDR with measured glucose disposal rate was highly significant (r = 0.624, P < 0.001).

We found highly significant differences ( p <0.001) in severity of pancreatitis, Ranson score, and mortality between the AKI and non-AKI groups: in the AKI group there were 8 mild and 44 severe panceatitis cases, the average Ranson score was 4.98±1.59, and mortality was 36.5%, whereas in the non- AKI group there were 190 mild and 63 severe panceatitis cases, the average Ranson score was 2.75±1.58, and mortality was 5.8%.

Highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were seen for several of the personal and clinical characteristics within the entire study cohort after stratification by stage at diagnosis (Table 1 ).

When the relationship between the prescribed dose and plasma concentrations was evaluated among participants receiving three different doses of duloxetine, a highly significant correlation was observed (r s = 0.559, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2 ).

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

However, on comparison between Group I and Group III, the mean difference was highly significant ( P <0.001).

Using ANOVA by treating dyskinesia scores as factors, dyskinesia scores were found to be highly significant for SL ( p < 0.001) and SA ( p < 0.001).

However, Fer-1 emerged as the most efficacious intervention to alleviate PA-induced cytotoxicity, demonstrating a marked restoration of cell viability with a highly significant statistical difference ( p < 0.001), although Fer-1 treatment alone had no significant effect on cell viability ( Figure S1 ).