“highly significant”

Statistical significance was evaluated based on adjusted P values (FDR), with thresholds set as follows: P < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 (**) indicated a highly significant difference, and P < 0.001 (***) denoted an extremely significant difference.

The overall differences in transcript levels between temperatures were not significant for some PR genes ( PR1 , PR4 , PR9 ) but the interactions between temperature and inoculation were all highly significant in the combined ANOVA ( P < 0.001, S5 Table ).

The serum levels of total IgE in patients with AR (GI, GII and GIII) were statistically highly significant compared with those in the control group ( p < 0.001).

Overall, the mean proportion of offspring arising from fertilizations by fresh sperm was 0.986 (± 0.052 s.d.), which clearly represents a highly significant fertilization advantage towards fresh sperm ( χ 2 = 15.154, p < 0.001). 4.

Type of salt people usually buy and reason for purchasing preference According to Table 5 there is highly significant association between geographical region and the type of salt consumed in Ethiopia (χ2 = 243.98, df = 20, p <0.001).

coli was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Significance thresholds were set at p < 0.05 for statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 for highly significant (**), p < 0.001 for very highly significant (***), and p < 0.0001 for extremely significant (****) results. 3.

Statistically significant changes were classified as significant (*) where p < 0.05, more significant (**) where p < 0.01 and highly significant (***) where p < 0.001.

This relationship followed a clear graded pattern: a highly significant association was found between the index finger vein position and the level of pneumonia severity (p<0.001, Cramer’s V=0.729), as shown in table 2 .

The static compliance, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), and IWI were highly significant predictors of weaning success ( P < .001).

The linear predicted value (_hat) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming that the selected covariates are independently associated of HBsAg serostatus.

Results: There was a highly significant decrease in the hepatic artery resistance index in group I, from 0.785 ± 0.088 to 0.717 ± 0.086 (P < 0.001).

The time × group interaction was highly significant for all five markers (all P < 0.001), demonstrating progressive and broad-spectrum attenuation of systemic inflammation and multi-organ injury over the 7-day JXD course. 4.

The difference was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This showed a highly significant monotonic decrease in mutant allele frequency with increasing silent donor proportion (p<<0.001, Figure 4B ).

The SART mean RT and errors of commission The mean RT had a highly significant effect on EoC [ F (1, 111.55) = 50.03, p < 0.001].

In addition, with respect to perceived learning achievement, participants showed highly significant differences in stressors, stress symptoms, coping strategies, and overall academic engagement and its dimensions, with U > 23790.500 and p = 0.001, such that greater perceived learning was associated with lower stress-related factors and higher academic engagement, although the effect sizes were small to approaching moderate (see Table 4 ).

The low-dose group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement compared to the NOA group (P < 0.05), while the high-dose group exhibited a more pronounced increase, with a highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

The results revealed a highly significant difference in genome size between cultivated and wild jujube (U = 22494.0, p < 0.001), with the median genome size of cultivated jujube (3.49 × 10 8 ) being significantly larger than that of wild jujube (3.37 × 10 8 ), and the Common Language Effect Size (CL = 0.355) confirming the practical relevance of this difference.

Pairwise comparisons of symptom change between timepoints Both depressive (HDRS) and anxiety (HAM-A) symptoms showed highly significant reductions from T1 to T2 ( p < 0.001) and continued to decrease significantly from T2 to T3 ( p < 0.001).

After adjustment for age, smoking, drinking, HbA1c, TC, LDL and SBP, the association was slightly weakened in both sexes but was still highly significant (all P < 0.001), and R 2 was greatly increased in both males and females (Table 4 , model 2).

The ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant effects for time (F = 9.307, p < 0.001) and for the time × group interaction term (F = 42.36, p < 0.001), indicating that although the SNOT-22 questionnaire score decreases spontaneously over time, the treated group shows a markedly greater and significantly larger reduction compared with the control group.

The two-way ANOVA results reveal the significant main effects of period (F(1, 3551) = 582.15, p < .001) and group (F(2, 3551) = 140.14, p < .001) as well as the highly significant interaction between them (F(2, 3551) = 899.69, p < .001).

The analysis yielded highly significant main effects of training/testing ( F (1,711) = 66.433, P < 0.001) and probe trial ( F (4,711) = 51.046, P < 0.001), respectively, indicating that the mean SI differed between the training and testing phases ( Fig. 3 , cf.

A Pearson chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test showed a highly significant accumulation of accompanying posterior malleolus fractures for type A fractures ( p = 0.001), regardless of the location of the fracture.