“highly significant”

There was highly significant increase in serum Dickkopf-1 levels in postmenopausal females with abnormal T score versus controls ( P < 0.001).

Results There was a highly significant relationship between the patient's compliance with physiotherapy and obtained ROM of the affected finger with a P value <0.001.

Our results show that for serial intervals of less than 2 days the observed effect of proximity (sharing a bay with someone else who was ill) is highly significant (p<0.001) and for serial intervals up to 2.5 days remained significant at the 5% level.

Figure 2 C shows significant post-treatment reductions in BI in both groups, with a highly significant change in the non-diabetic group ( P < 0.001) and a significant change in the diabetic group ( P < 0.05).

Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin sampling adequacy measure was 0.80 and Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant ( P<0 . 001 ).

Correlation of all three histological grades with the Glucksberg stage of intestinal GvHD was highly significant in terms of the maximum, median, mean, and even minimum of all three grading system scores (each p ≤ 0.001) ( S1 – S3 Figs).

After adjustment, the effect size ( r = − 0.26, 95% CI = − 0.33 to − 0.19) showed minimal change from the original estimate (r = − 0.24), remaining highly significant ( p < 0.001).

We pooled the absolute errors from both computations and applied matched pairs t-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test, which were highly significant with p = 0.001 and p = 0.003 for the two-tailed test, respectively.

The lowest values of index tests, the ROMA and SRR, were found in women with benign masses, with the differences between this group and both borderline and early stage malignancies being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Complex S*E Model for Ethiopian Regions The complex model (2) with strain, environment, sex, and all their two-way and three-way interactions showed highly significant S*E effects ( p < 0.001; bold in Table 6 ) when using the Ethiopian region as the environment.

HT-29 cells treated with 0.1 μg/mL of LPS for 48 h (called “control + LPS”) induced a highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) of all the tested cytokines with respect to the control ( Figures 2 and 3 ).

This number of simulations indicates a PRCC value of above 0.24 or below -0.24 is considered to be highly significant with a p value <0.001 [108] .

The difference between the two groups was highly significant (p<0.001, Student’s test, two-tailed, with Microsoft Excel) in terms of the evolution of the sequences, meaning that recent Guangxi CRF08_BC strains were more evolutionarily different from each other, suggesting perhaps that these strains undergo adaption that allows them to infect people in this locality.

As expected, the difference in FA levels between formalin-employers and non-employers proved to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

At the same time, the direct effect of the TyG index on arteriosclerosis remained highly significant (β = 0.085, P < 0.001), indicating that the TyG index itself has a considerable positive impact on the risk of arteriosclerosis, even without considering ABI levels.

The Mann–Whitney U-test for statistical analysis of the distribution of I-ELISA PP values showed that there were highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between PP values of subpopulations from the RVF-endemic and RVF-free groups per animal species of sheep, goats, or cattle ( Table 4 ).

Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.001.

However, the most striking contrast is observed in thrombophilia, where difference deliver a highly significant p -value of <0.001.

The total number of cases in each solar term across the two years was summed, and a chi-square test revealed a highly significant nonuniform distribution of cases across the solar terms (p<0.001).This study employs time series decomposition to break down the disease incidence sequence into three core components: the long-term trend component (T t , reflecting the baseline changes in incidence), the seasonal component (S t , characterizing the periodic fluctuations of the solar terms), and the residual component (R t , random noise).

Population structure Overall F ST value was highly significant ( F ST = 0.04; 95% Confidence Interval C.I . = 0.017 0.039; P <0.001) and pair-wise F ST revealed significant values for 107 out of 120 comparisons, after Bonferroni correction ( Table 4 ).

The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was appropriate as indicated by a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy of 0.846 and a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity ( p < 0.001), showing two common factors with a cumulative contribution rate of 59.61% extracted.

The result obtained from the KMO = 0.852 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity is highly significant, p < 0.001. supports the applicability of factor analysis.

Comparison of data using one-way ANOVA showed that the P value was highly significant ( P < 0.001) among the groups.

We found a highly significant association ( p < 0.001) between IMP3 and SLUG immunopositivity with 86.67% cases showing positivity for both.

Besides, there is a highly significant reduction of the time spent in the central area of the open field test, within the SF rats on the 14 th day in comparison to basal values ( p < 0.001) and testing on the 7 th day ( p < 0.01). 3.1.2.