“highly significant”

We found that the main effect of group was highly significant ( F (1,59) = 20.76, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.26, power = 0.99), suggesting that participants from the orthodontics group performed with higher levels of impulsivity toward immediate rewards.

Sporolactobacillus occurred at the late stages of ensiling and exposure stage with abundance of 7.7% (d 40), 5.32% (d 60), 28.15% (d 63), the increase at exposure stage was highly significant (p<0.001) ( Figure 5 ).

This reduction was more than 50% of the control levels and it was statistically highly significant ( Fig. 1B , p<0.001).

Exposure to pravastatin was associated with the highest odds ratio for readmission (OR = 13.10; 95% CI (2.82, 60.8); P = 0.017;) and chlorpromazine was highly significant with moderate odds ratio (OR = 4.53; 95% CI (2.66, 7.37; P < 0.001).

Intubating conditions scores in Group P2 group was lower than Group P1, the statistical difference being very highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This table shows the onset of sensory and motor block which was highly significant statistically in these three groups showing the fastest onset of sensory[ 5 ] and motor block in Group B as compared to Group A and C ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

atrata nymphs decreased year by year ( Fig 3 ), with highly significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test, H = 17.024, P = 0.001).

The difference in nipple level was highly significant ( P < 0.001) at 1 and 10 years, with no significant change in nipple level between 1 and 10 years.

Thus, when excluding BEAR, GLMMs identified highly significant relationships between the first bCA axis and lateral connectivity (df = 1, χ 2 = 14.74, p-value < 0.001, Fig. 4a ) and between the third bCA axis and lateral connectivity (df = 1, χ 2 = 12.33, p-value < 0.001).

4A ), highlighted on the first axis (47.2% of the total inertia) of the projection, a highly significant distinction (PERMANOVA test, P = 0.001; Table 1 ) between the samples collected in June and those collected from July to September.

The mediator analysis did not support the hypothesis of a mediating effect of CRP on the association between RMR and HOMA-IR in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses since HOMA-IR remained highly significant (adjusted: ß = 28.4 ± 7.5, p ≤ 0.001) after inclusion of CRP (Table 3 ).

Fisher’s exact test for this association was highly significant ( P value < 0.001).

The human group demonstrated a highly significant advantage in procedure time (p = 0.001).

Rather, these terminally differentiated cells exhibited a spontaneous highly significant ( p < 0.001) and time-dependent increase in ROS generation in association with sperm capacitation that was not influenced by RF-EMR exposure (Figure 5A ).

Saturation of EGFR in A431 xenografts resulted in highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction in the [ 68 Ga]Ga-DFO-ZEGFR:2377 uptake in tumors ( Figure 6 and Figure 9 ).

Our analysis revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) association between the expression of the Thomsen-Friedenreich (TF) antigen and MSI status.

The plots below compare improvements in Comm, SEC, and MI which were all highly significant (mean change in Comm = 23% (19–27%), SEC = 19% (13–27%), MI = 22% (17–29%), all p -values < 0.001).

Differential Perceived Stress in International and German Students With regard to the differential stress levels of the two subgroups, IMS and GMS, involved in the TP, a highly significant interaction between the two factors TP participants and time point with F (1.67) = 22.35, p < 0.001, ε 2 = 0.250 is revealed in the ANOVA with repeated measurements.

The rmANCOVA on HDRS Bech -scores revealed a highly significant day * status interaction (F = 37.238, p < 0.001).

A paired t -test showed that this difference was highly significant, t (19) = −4.94, p < .001, Cohen’s d = −1.11.

Interspecific discrimination by shape All pairwise interspecific comparisons of shape (of either eggs or operculum) were highly significant (permutation test, 1000 cycles, P < 0.001).

Concerning the correlations between the measured endocrine parameters in chickens (regardless of the butyrate exposure), highly significant (P < 0.001) positive correlations were found between plasma GIP and GLP-1 values ( Fig 3A ), GIP and insulin levels ( Fig 3B ) and GLP-1 and insulin concentrations ( Fig 3C ).

Geographic distance, chronological distance, and the interaction term all have a highly significant effect ( p < .001).

cordiformis were highly significant (ANOSIM global R = 0.76, P = 0.001).

Järvelä and colleagues showed a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between thigh measurement and the isokinetic strength test for knee extension [ 26 ].