“highly significant”

Results The egg quality was assessed quantitatively as egg weight ( Table 1 ), and highly significant effects of both genotype and hen age were found ( p < 0.001).

Where available, hyperCKemia (>200 U/L) was observed in 16/111 (14.4%) of the mild patients and in 26/74 (35.1%) of the severe patients, with a highly significant p = 0.001.

There was highly significant ( P < 0.001) statistical relationship between primary site of tumor and histopathologic subtype.

We observed also a highly significant difference in piR-823 expression levels between tumors 3.4 ± 1.9-fold-change and their corresponding adjacent normal tissue samples (1.0 ± 0.4) ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

Exercise was also shown to have a highly significant advantage over no therapy, in controls, to improve the negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients (–25 ± 8 vs. 0.2 ± 1.08, respectively; P <0.001).

As there was a large difference in the log-likelihoods between the two models (75.33), the likelihood ratio test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In accordance with H4.1 and H4.2, the correlation coefficients between state anxiety and learned trust showed a decrease over time, with a highly significant negative correlation between state anxiety and initial learned trust ( r = −0.59, p < 0.001), and a medium significant negative correlation with dynamic learned trust in the first trial ( r = −0.36, p = 0.031), and a non-significant negative correlation in the second trial ( r = −0.31, p = 0.054).

The interaction between the effect of before versus after the correct transfer and the type of behaviour executed by the receiver was highly significant ( χ 2 = 16.68, d.f. = 2, p < 0.001).

It was consistent throughout all models 1–17 that all variable loadings were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The differences in BMI and WC of the two groups were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Commodity type had a highly significant relationship with the odds of both AFB1 detection (p < 0.001) and illegal status (p < 0.001).

However, having a child with cancer did not show a significant association with the fathers’ reported stress scores (p = 0.476) when spousal stress was in the model, but was highly significant once that was removed (p < 0.001).

Differential expression of the same three genes in these groups was illustrated in a comparison figure ( Figure 7B ), indicating a highly significant variation in IDO1 expression between high- and low-risk groups ( p < 0.001), with CA2 and TNF also showing significant differences ( p < 0.05).

The fertilization rate in all 125 cycles was 67.2% in the CT group and 53.5% in the non-CT group, with the difference being highly significant ( X 2 = 18.9, P < 0.001).

CA analysis of the entire Sandbian ( gracilis and bicornis biozones) ostracod fauna revealed a clear latitudinal signal, with all southern marginal localities lying on the right side of the first CA axis, and most midcontinent localities on the left ( Figure 4a ); this relation with latitude was highly significant (CCA, p<0.001).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference between the HMGB-1 and control groups in the ratio of regenerated bone volume ( p < 0.001), while a significant difference was also detected between the HMGB-1 and rhBMP-2 groups ( p < 0.05) (Fig. 3 A).

Cells pre-treated with morin showed a highly significant (P<0.001) decline in the ROS generation by 2.33 fold in comparison to glucose stressed cells, whereas, 1.75 fold (P<0.001) and 1.6 fold (P<0.01) decrease in ROS generation was observed in co- treated and post- treated hepatocytes ( Fig. 1c ).

Experiment one: open field There was a highly significant effect of drug treatment on the pigs’ scores on dimension one (a continuum from nervous to confident) of the QBA consensus profile ( W = 19.66, P < 0.001; Fig. 1 a), with no effect on dimension two (a continuum from calm to agitated) ( W = 0.00, P = 0.98).

These associations were highly significant for all three measures of selection, including the number of negatively selected residues (β = 0.68, 95% CI 0.42–0.92, P < 0.001; Fig. 4 a), number of positively selected residues (β = 0.70, 95% CI 0.28–1.13, P = 0.001; Fig. 4 b), and dN / dS ratios (β = 0.67, 95% CI 0.26–1.08, P = 0.002; Fig. 4 c) (Additional file 1 : Table S1).

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) Analysis of molecular variance showed a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in D . alata accessions within regions.

All of the correlations with VF MD and NFL thickness were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The difference in incidence was highly significant at both week 2 and 6 ( P < 0.001 and P < 0.013, respectively).

MM extrusion showed similar correlation with OA which was strongly positive and highly significant (P < 0.001 and r = 0.8713).

Regression analysis indicated that the laser treatment had no significant effect on the microleakage scores, while the effect of the material type and the margin location was highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) ( Table 4 ). 4.

This difference was highly significant (t-test, p<10 −3 ; Fig. 4C ).