Item 7 “has an intense approach to life” and item 13 “spends his/her day doing things of interest to him/her” were removed due to high fit statistics of 3.03 and 4.36 respectively (>±2.5), and highly significant Chi squared values (p < 0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
We interpreted p < 0.05 as significant; p < 0.01 as highly significant, and p < 0.001 as very highly significant.
Data are expressed as means ± standard mean error and differences were considered as significant (∗p < 0.05), very significant (∗∗p < 0.01), or highly significant (∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Although highly significant, the positive correlation between OD and fumarate (Spearman rank correlation, P < 0.001 and ρ = 0.18) and glycerol ( P < 0.001 and ρ = 0.22) concentrations, respectively, was very weak.
Serum neurofilament light chain We observed a highly significant and strong reduction in median sNfL levels from 24 pg/ml at baseline, to 11 pg/ml at 6-month follow-up ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon signed rank test).
The mean difference between the two classes (4.6 years) is highly significant (comparison of annual means against a null hypothesis of Δμ = 0: F 1,60 =74.8, p < 0.001).
The optimal anchor scaffold depended on the reporter genes, particularly the anchor orientation had a dominant and highly significant effect on the surface display activity (ANOVA, p < 0.001, Fig. 3 B).
Plant height exhibited highly significant differences between cultivars and topping levels ( p ≤ 0.001).
Notably, the difference in ammonium N content between these two microenvironments was highly significant in the N3 treatment ( P < 0.001).
The expression level of the PPO gene was highly significant in X. nematophila All plus AA ( t 4 = 1.917, p = 0.001) and non-significant in P. luminescens H06 plus AA ( t 4 = 2.93, p = 0.070) treatment. 4.
The reduction in mean score postoperatively was highly significant ( P <.001).
Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in antifungal activity between all EOs tested.
There were a significant effect of environment ( P = 0.001) and a highly significant E × S interaction ( P = 0.001), whereas salinity alone did not exert a statistically significant main effect ( P = 0.18).
Notably, statistical analysis revealed that the OCC + Laser group exhibited a significant difference ( P < 0.05) compared with the OCC alone group, and a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) compared with the Ce6 + Laser group.
A highly significant association was found between acuity group and recorded pre-hospital intervention ( p ≤ 0.001).
sPG identified functional patterns in 29.3% of previously unclear vertigo/dizziness cases, leading to a highly significant increase in the diagnosis of functional dizziness ( p < 0.001).
Two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of antioxidant type ( P < 0.001 ), confirming that antioxidant efficacy was preserved irrespective of the adhesive system used.
A significance level of p < 0.05 was adopted, with p < 0.05 indicating a significant difference, p < 0.01 indicating a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 indicating an extremely significant difference. 3 Results 3.1 Morphology, swelling properties, adhesion, twisting, bending, and detachment behavior of the hydrogel 3.1.1 Macroscopic and microscopic morphologies The lyophilized BP-QS/TGF-β3 powder appeared light yellow in color, while the hydrated hydrogel was transparent and formed a homogeneous, bubble-free elastic solid after gelation ( Figures 2A-1, A-2 ).
The log-rank test indicated a highly significant difference among groups (P < 0.001).
The difference in the two ecological zones for kdr-e (L1014S) mutation was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Of particular note, the analysis revealed a highly significant and steep increase in amoxicillin resistance ( Figure 4 ) from 2018 to 2024 (OR per year, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.31–1.96; p < 0.001).
The results of Table 4 and Fig 1 demonstrate that there is a small, yet statistically highly significant ( p < .001) positive effect of the access code presented to the respondents on the overall quality assessment.
The difference in operating time for patients who underwent UNE and BNE was statistically highly significant (71 min vs. 97 min, p ≤ 0.001).
There was a highly significant correlation between the vitreous concentration of tenascin-C and periostin in the 133 eyes with PDR (r = 0.470, p<0.001; Spearman correlation; Figure 1B ).
In the current study, when comparing the performance of the McIsaac score and RADT versus routine throat culture, we found a highly significant association between both McIsaac score ( P <.001) and RADT ( P <.001) and the result of the throat culture ( Table 3 ).