“highly significant”

To confirm this interpretation, we first subtracted ratings during the viewing of neutral pictures from ratings during the negative pictures for each instruction and then compared these difference terms, which resulted in a highly significant difference, p <.001 ( Fig. 2B ).

This latter finding reflects the highly significant partial correlation between age 11 MHT score and later life Raven score, controlling for cohort (r = 0.52, df = 892, p < 0.001).

Close to two thirds (63%) of the probes showing DE-between females of the two strains had lower expression in WL females, which is a highly significant bias (χ 2 , d.f. = 1, P < 0.001).

With ′t′ value of 6.7 which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) and percentage reduction was 22.1%.

There was a highly significant effect of genotype on tolerance, as indicated (***, p<0.001), and also of pre-exposure duration, as well as a significant interaction between genotype and pre-exposure duration (two-way ANOVA; n = 4 (30 min and 50 min pre-exposure) or 8 (40 min pre-exposure).

If we substitute letter knowledge for receptive language as a predictor of reading progress in Model 2, letter knowledge is a highly significant predictor (B = 0.31; t = 3.15; p < .001) with the overall model (age, attendance, and letter knowledge) accounting for 35% of the variance in reading growth.

The KS test for comparison of variance showed that the difference in the bacterial ratio variances between pu.1 and LWT is highly significant ( P < 0.001).

However, when each of these variables was introduced into the model alongside body weight, which itself remained highly significant (p<0.001), the relationships between HOMA-IR and both PA and %BF were essentially unchanged.

In Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test, the difference in means turns out to be highly significant (z = 45.558, p<0.001), showing the overweight vignette to be rated consistently more negatively.

0.004), perhaps due to differences in the durations of the delay period, but statistically still highly significant in both studies (all p values < 0.001).

We found highly significant (P<0.001) increase in the prevalence of ECG abnormalities in males as compare to females.

While 100% relief in pain (highly significant [P < 0.001**]) was observed in group-II.

The global Moran test of spatial auto-correlations at the CSD spatial scale using both boundary and inverse distance weights were highly significant (P < 0.001).

Statistical analysis again indicated that these differences in growth were highly significant across all time points (p<0.001).

complex) were highly significant (Chi-square test, p < 0.001 for both tests).

Results There was a highly significant increase in serum soluble endoglin in high-risk women compared with controls at week 13 ( P < 0.001).

An evaluation was done for PB Treg cells by pooling newly diagnosed, relapsed and patients in remission together as a MM cohort; this pooled cohort did not show statistical significance against MGUS and SMM, while it was highly significant against HVs (P<0.001).

field temperature were highly significant (P<0.001) and with average R 2 above 0.95) and actual warming was within ±5% of the prescribed value [35] .

For subjects with complete PANSS data at T3 (N = 515), being in remission at both T1 and T2 demonstrated a trend towards prediction of remission at T3 (p = .064) with an Odds Ratio = 4.8 (95% Confidence Interval: 0.91–24.8) For subjects with complete PANSS data at T4 (N = 427), being in remission at both T2 and T3 was a highly significant predictor of remission at T4 (p < 0.001) OR = 9.7 (95% Confidence Interval: 5.4–17.4).

Highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) differences were found among all nutrigenetic traits of polyvoltine silkworm strains in the experimental groups.

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were observed between samples collected in 2008 and samples from all the sampling dates of 2009 with values ranging from 0.103 to 0.180 ( Table 3 ).

Critically, the cross-over interaction between the Target Type and the Prime Type was highly significant, F 1 (2, 30) = 14.17, MS e = 44.37, p <.001; F 2 (2, 56) = 12.97, MS e = 63.49, p <.001.

The three distinct groups of samples observed in the 2D PCA scatter plot were found to be highly significant in the discriminant analysis (Wilks’ lambda = 0.003; F 6,787 = 4628.199; P <0.001).

Highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) differences were found among all nutrigenetic traits of polyvoltine silkworm strains in the experimental groups.

The results showed that the dilacerated or pointed roots, maxillary premolar extraction cases, and treatment duration were highly significant factors for root resorption (p<0.001).