“highly significant”

The ANOVA showed a highly significant and strong effect of time [ F (3.85, 161.7) = 155.9, p < 0.001, η g 2 = 0.554].

There was a highly significant increase in knowledge and skills from T0 to T1 in both groups for all items (all p < 0.001).

Genotypes (G) significantly influenced all the physiological traits studied (Phi2, PhiNPQ, PhiNO, SPAD, LEF, NPQt, FvP/FmP, and LT), as indicated by the highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001) and large mean-square values.

Yield results showed that all three main effects (hybrids, stand densities, and environments) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and that the interactions hybrid × stand density and hybrid × environment were also statistically significant for yield ( p < 0.05; Table 4 ).

The linear regression model was also highly significant, and presented a high value of coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.93, F = 124.08, p = 0.001).

Highly significant differences were found between the ADHD and control groups for the variables ‘pain level’ (p < .001) and ‘pain location’ (p < .001).

Statistical comparison using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test demonstrated a highly significant improvement in Stamey scores for the entire cohort ( p < 0.001).

Figure 1 shows that there was a highly significant positive correlation between TBOEP and TCiPP ( r = 0.72, p ≤ 0.001), TDCiPP ( r = 0.76, p ≤ 0.001), TPhP ( r = 0.87, p ≤ 0.001), and EHDPP ( r = 0.76, p ≤ 0.001).

The difference was highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Differences with p < 0.05 are considered statistically significant, differences with p < 0.01 are considered highly significant, and differences with p < 0.001 are considered extremely significant.

Results Changes in (ABC-M), (ABC-D), (ABC-BL), (ABC-B), and (ABC-O) levels showed statistically highly significant differences between T1 and T2 for both bone allografts ( p < 0.001).

Trend of preterm birth From the final set for analyses, (N = 4 392 427), we can observe a highly significant increase (p <0.001) in the rates of PTB by period (Table 2 ).

Overall, a highly significant effect of the extraction method on the extractive yields was observed ( p < 0.001).

β-caryophyllene and TMA shared the same trend and displayed highly significant recovery ( ### p <0.001) at 1 and 10 μg/mL for β-caryophyllene, and 0.1–10 μg/mL for TMA ( Figure 9 ). 2.10.

The results indicate the same highly significant (P<0.001) accumulation of Th1 cells as found in the short term homing assay.

Warfarin (1.25 mg/kg) produced a highly significant ( p< 0.001) decrease in thrombus weight compared with the control group (6.93 ± 0.30 mg and 17.81 ± 0.75 mg, respectively) ( Table 1 ).

Regarding oocyte retrieval, breed had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) impact on the number of total COCs, available COCs, and grade A COCs per ewe ( Table 1 and Table S1 ).

The model without the interaction was highly significant (LMM III: χ 2 = 122.079, df = 1, p < 0.001, R 2 m/c = 0.51/0.92) (Table S10 ).

Hearing improvement after surgery was found to be statistically highly significant with P<0.001.

The present study showed a statistically highly significant knowledge and attitude difference between Group A and Group B ( P<0.001).

Consequently, the alleles in seven SNP loci showed significant differences ( P < 0.05), and highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were shown in the four SNP loci of which the three SNP loci were breed-specific between the two working groups given in Table 3 .

This correlation to infants’ serology remained highly significant (p < 0.001) for all HPV types at the 6-month FU (p < 0.001): HPV6 (r = 0.266), HPV11 (r = 0.344), HPV16 (r = 0.321), HPV18 (r = 0.220) and HPV45 (r = 0.259).

Resting heart rate and physical fitness (VO 2 Max) There was a highly significant correlation between VO 2 Max and resting heart rate (R=−0.34, p<0.001) ( figure 2 ).

Total WCFS Score The final hierarchical multiple regression model accounted for 66.7% of the variance in total WCFS score (adjusted- R 2 ), with the addition of ARQ scores in Block 6 accounting for a highly significant ( p < 0.001) extra 3.5% of the variance being explained.

The effect of the cesium term was highly significant ( p < 0.001, F-test).