“highly significant”

The difference between the JNDs in the blur- and luminance-based experiments was highly significant ( t (52) = −8.18, P < 0.001, paired t -test; see Supplementary Fig.

Similarly, impulse toward self-harm and suicide risk were highly significant factors, with ORs of 8.904 (95% CI: 4.28–18.52, p < 0.001) and 2.903 (95% CI: 1.42–5.94, p = 0.006), respectively.

Migrant affiliation (%PMW), subsidized health affiliation (%PSW), child homicide rate (CHR), and suicide rate (SR) remain highly significant ( p < 0.001), reinforcing their role in early fertility vulnerability.

Furthermore, the prognostic association of the 70 μg/dL threshold remained highly significant even after stratifying by presence of HCC (stratified log-rank test, p < 0.001); for instance, within the HCC cohort, the median OS was 68.4 months in the ≥70 μg/dL group compared to 37.7 months in the <70 μg/dL group.

Only WC was highly significant ( P < 0.001) when considered together with diet, physical activity, and psychosocial score in the model without PCA (1st 2 columns).

Statistical tests were considered significant at p < 0.05 and considered highly significant at p < 0.001.

Figure 4 shows the distribution observed for each of the groups derived from the above criterion, indicating that the differences between groups were highly significant ( F = 743.12, df = 3, 244; p < 0.001; ε = 0.61).

Even though both sample sets were analyzed using the same qPCR conditions, a highly significant difference in Tm values was appreciated ( P < 0.001), indicating that the signals obtained for these miRNAs in the clinical samples are not specific and are presumably caused by non-specific amplification of one or more other miRNAs present in the samples.

Based on the educational level of the participants, there was a highly significant difference between the rates of asking questions to an orthopaedist using the internet ( P = 0.001).

The ANOVA results reveal that the tool-axis orientation is the dominant factor affecting the bottom height deviation (Δ h ), with a highly significant p -value ( p = 0.001).

All correlations were positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This reduction was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.001).

The covered/hulless trait had a highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) effect on all traits but protein.

After 25 min of incubation, samples at concentrations of 0.01 ng/μL, 0.1 ng/μL, 1 ng/μL, and 10 ng/μL showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) compared to the control group (CK), while no significant difference was observed for the 0.001 ng/μL samples ( Figure 4 b).

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure indicating good sampling adequacy (0.837) and the highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (11,959.726; degrees of freedom = 171, p < 0.001) suggest that the dataset was suitable for factor analysis.

The fact that no papers found negative correlations between fecundity and biomass was highly significant (0 out of 71; exact binomial test; P < 0.001).

Several genes associated with specific phenolic acids: for instance, FxaYL_742g0962550 showed a highly significant correlation (*** p < 0.001) with 4-coumarate (also known as p-coumaric acid, which is high in FY, Figure 4 a), while the genes FxaYL_612g0137540 and FxaYL_341g0295300 were both strongly linked (*** p < 0.001) to the levels of anthranilate and rosmarinate ( Figure 6 d).

For all cases, significance level was established at α = 0.05, and defining 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 as statistically significant (*), 0.001 ≤ p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 as whole-level significance (***). 5.

Both the main effects of species and desiccation treatment, as well as their interaction, were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) for all ChlaF traits, demonstrating strong species-specific variation in PSII sensitivity to desiccation stress.

It is important to note, however, that the magnitude of this difference was not as large as those seen in previous research (e.g., Klink, 2000 ), who reported a highly significant difference for the majority of tested word pairs (i.e., p < 0.001).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of time ( p < 0.001), indicating a progressive increase in rooting percentages throughout the experimental period, regardless of treatment.

The median scores for correct responses across all six sections of the BDDT improved markedly in both groups, with highly significant p -values (all p < 0.001).

Since the p -value is highly significant ( p = 0.001), we can conclude that there are indeed significant differences in fungal communities between the three sites.

This latter element shows a highly significant correlation with having high popularity (r = 0.325, p < 0.001).

The association between variables was highly significant (p<0,001).