“highly significant”

Exercise: Coefficient is 0.231, showing a positive, highly significant relationship ( P < 0.001) with a VIF of 1.022, indicating no multicollinearity.

McMillan 2007 found that caregivers overestimated symptom intensity for pain (the difference in mean scores was 1.33 in a 0 to 10 scale), breathlessness (0.78 difference in mean scores in a 0 to 10 scale) and constipation (1.08 difference in mean scores in 0 to 16 scale); all three differences were highly significant (paired t‐tests; P value < 0.001).

The results showed that the Red (600–700 nm) and NIR (750–900 nm) bands provided the strongest discriminatory power among species, with highly significant F-values (p < 0.001).

Agronomical traits Differences among lines were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all evaluated traits, indicating wide phenotypic variation ( Table 2 ).

The results of the multiple logistic regression analyses indicated a highly significant correlation between extinction and O 2 -carrying capacity ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 A; Tables S3–S9 ).

An RM ANOVA on the slope of the fitted functions testing the effects of Measurement (THR, BAL), Rate (1,500; 18,000 pps), and Electrode (apical, basal) showed a highly significant effect of Measurement [ F ( 1 , 10 ) = 42.29 , p < 0.001 , η 2 = 0.81 ].

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences between the periods (p < 0.001), as shown in Supplementary Table S2 .

Age Age showed a highly significant relationship with reconstruction ( p < 0.001).

Mean charasome area fractions (percentage of cortical area occupied by charasomes) in cells investigated during the course of this study were 18.7 (±1.9 SD, n = 6) at the acid regions and 2.2 (±0.2 SD, n = 5) at the alkaline zones, and differences were highly significant ( P ≤0.001, t test).

Linear regression showed a highly significant linear relationship between the Dixon techniques and MRS for liver fat quantification ( P < 0.001) (Figure 3 ).

The extent of gorging behavior increased throughout the 14 day measurement period so that the increase in 2 h food intake was highly significant when averaged over the last 5 days of the restriction (ANOVA F 2 , 27 = 44.8, P < 0.001).

The mean change in dietary adherence from baseline to study end was +7.33 (95% CI [5.76–8.89]), which was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant association was observed between gender and blood pressure status (χ2 = 75.69, p = 0.001).

Despite this wide range of treatments, our meta-analysis confirms that there is a highly significant overall effect of drought on the amount of total biomass (dry weight) of riparian wetland plants (random-effects model, P < 0.001; Table 1 ), which becomes critical when droughts last longer than approximately 30 days (Fig. 1 ).

Biochemical characteristics Patients in the schizophrenia group had higher fasting blood sugar (FBS) levels compared to the control group, and the control group had higher FBS levels than the methamphetamine group, with highly significant differences (p<0.001).

A highly significant influence on mental exhaustion was found for the predictor variable quantitative demands after inclusion of all variables (model 2) ( B = 0.38, β = 0.39, p < 0.001).

There are highly significant differences between K and RT ( t (df = 44) = 12.795, p < 0.001), between K and RT FL ( t (df = 44) = 10.064, p < 0.001), between D K and MD FL ( t (44) = 8.511, p < 0.001), and between D K and MD ( t (44) = 9.227, p < 0.001).

The log-rank also reported a highly significant association between survival and ferritin values with P < 0.001.

The HMR model for intentions to sterilise semi-owned dogs in the future was highly significant F(9, 48) = 11.45, p < 0.001.

The results indicated that 5% of HA gel showed highly significant papilla enhancement ( p = 0.001) at 6 months compared with lower concentrations.

The results revealed a highly significant difference ( χ 2 = 22.66 , p < 0.001 ), confirming that the detection model performs differently depending on whether the input was written by a human or generated by an AI model.

Correlation coefficients for the polymer-size traits and high molecular weight fructan content were calculated using data from all three dates and were highly significant ( P < 0.001) in all cases (major peak, r = 0.733; largest peak, r = 0.693; profile regression constant, r = 0.700; profile regression slope, r = 0.658; n = 33).

Not surprisingly, ROC curves performed for each subgroup of patients versus sCD138 quantification in controls were highly significant (P < 0.001).

P < 0.05 (∗) was considered significant, P < 0.01 (∗∗) was highly significant, and P < 0.001 (∗∗∗) was extremely significant. 2.

McNemar’s test confirmed that the difference in individual-level positivity between RDT and qPCR was highly significant ( P < 0.001), suggesting that reliance on RDTs alone may underestimate true infection prevalence, particularly in low-density or asymptomatic infections.