“highly significant”

In this controlled context ( Figure 7 ), a highly significant Treatment × Genotype × Root layer interaction ( p < 0.001) was observed for five traits.

Results confirmed a highly significant main effect of Behavior [F(1, 315) = 4936.22, p <.001, η2 = 0.940], with approach events (mean = 37.65 per session) substantially outnumbering avoidance events (mean = 5.15 per session) across both groups and all sessions.

However, a highly significant discrepancy was observed in the geographic origin of the cases ( P < 0.001).

Two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant effects of concentration (F = 305.0, P < 0.001), exposure duration (F = 90.87, P < 0.001), and interaction between both factors (F = 7.22, P = 0.001).

This corresponds to a relative reduction of 88.9%, which was statistically highly significant (t[45] = 13.336, p < 0.001).

The results confirmed that habitat type had a highly significant effect on root-associated endophytic fungal community structure ( R 2 = 0.49967, F = 4.6143, P = 0.001). 3.7.

Similarly, DO exhibited highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in nearly all seasonal contrasts for each river, with the only non-significant result being for ZH river between dry and wet seasons ( p = 0.316).

Therefore, found that group B (SE adhesive) exhibited the highest mean bond strength at 131.03 N, which was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001) compared to the other groups.

A highly significant correlation was found in the cells pre-treated with different concentrations of L-DOPA (Y = 0.924x+11.603, R2 = 0.974, P<0.001).

ITSA ( Figure 3 ) confirmed a highly significant and large immediate level increase (β 2 = 22,724; 95% CI [9,754, 35,695]; p=0.001), with a non-significant post-intervention slope change (β 3 = +318/month; 95% CI [−786, 1,423]; p=0.572).

Using these cut-off values and all available data, there was highly significant concordance (p<0.001) between the three methods as shown in Table 2 .

ILD tests for both the combined molecular, and combined molecular and morphological data sets partitioned simultaneously into separate loci/morphology were also highly significant (P < 0.001).

The more precise lipidomic analysis of long chain FA uptake for example (Figure 3D) contains 363 measurements and is highly significant ( P < .001) as is the correlation with long-term reverse remodelling ( n = 231, from seven patients, P < .001, Supplementary Table 3).

Among controls only, comparing means of composite genotypes showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) between either the HYA_HYA or HIGH groups and any of the YA_O, HA_O, LA_O, O_O, LOW1, or LOW2 groups.

In this table, comparing Malay’s samples and Bolton’s standard, showed highly significant differences between the Malay anterior ratio ( p < 0.001) and overall ratio ( p < 0.001) which suggest non applicability of Bolton’s value to Malay ethnic.

CV-SeNPs caused a highly significant decrease in biofilm formation ( p < 0.001), with the percentage of reduction of biofilm equaling 58.3% when compared to untreated cells.

The general effect of % of body weight increase between groups was found to be very highly significant (p < 0.001).

Sagittal forces (Fx) In the sagittal direction (x; vestibulo/oral), highly significant overall group differences were detected for mesial and distal rotation (both p < 0.001).

The discriminant analysis revealed a highly significant overall separation among groups based on their CHC profiles (approximated Wilks’ λ = 0, χ2 = 949, p < 0.001).

The difference between the two modalities was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The factor model demonstrated substantial improvement over the baseline independence model, with the chi-square difference being highly significant (Δ χ2 = 2658.84, Δdf = 6, p < 0.001; calculated as 2699.50–40.66).

Also highly significant (P < 0.001) but more moderate values of correlations (from 0.39 to 0.56) were observed between WG and PC with LES and hematocrit level (HEMA), and between HEMA and LES.

.S. 7.87 * 2.55 N.S. 6.61 Sugg. 3.79 N.S. 4.66 N.S. 4.06 N.S. 3.60 N.S. 3.87 N.S. 3.14 N.S. 4.51 N.S. 2.80 N.S. 4.03 N.S. 4.47 N.S. 3.75 N.S. 3.80 N.S. 12.50 ** 2.13 N.S. 11.27 * .94 N.S. .68 N.S. 3.49 N.S. 40.57 35.53 173.61 * * * * Significant (P<0.05). ** Highly significant (P<0.001). 82 A 80.2 B 77.0 C 79.4 D 83.6 E 77.4 F 82.1 G. 83.7 H 80.7 I 86.2 J 86.8 K 81.0 L 85.3 M 85.9 N 85.0 0 88.0 P 91.7 Q 84.3 R 90.2 S 82.6 T 87.1 U 91.0 V 80.0 W 83.6 X 86.6 Total 84.1 Volume 36, August 1963 Attrition in Hiroshima Study I ANDERSON viduals participated in the study.

In the first multivariable model (Model 1) adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, smoking pack-years, and baseline FEV 1 , rural residence remained highly significant (HR, 1.439; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.247–1.660, P < 0.001).

Notably, upon a correlation analysis of the stalk crushing strengths between the three planting plots, a highly significant ( P < 0.001) correlation was observed ( Figure 2D ), indicating that stalk crushing strength should be a genetically controlled characteristic that could be stably applied for stalk mechanical strength characterization in sugarcane.