“highly significant”

Although many of our findings were highly significant ( P < 0.001), future studies should consider applying corrections for multiple testing.

At week 6 (the third harvest date), there was a highly significant interaction between treatments ( P = 0.001) indicating that plant species and temperature influenced the biomass of endophyte mycelia ( Tables 1 , 2 ).

The individual items of the MEDI-Lite questionnaire were also considered; the results were summarized in Table 2 and categorized based on the 3 GWG groups, showing a highly significant association with the average daily consumption of vegetables ( P < 0.001).

Correlations between body mass and BCI were highly significant ( p < 0.001) in all of the studied species ( A. sylvaticus r = 0.96; A. flavicollis r = 0.98; M. glareolus r = 0.98).

The relationship between TAGB and the predictor variable was also found highly significant at (p ≤ 0.001).

Similar to diet composition, the microbiome also exhibited highly significant dissimilarity ( p < 0.001, R = 0.235) between spring/autumn and spring/summer seasons.

The significant ( P < 0.001) low positive correlation (0.28) of columella convexity with the length of maxilla agrees with the findings of Gulsen et al .[ 17 ] Columella convexity of the nose when related with vertical skeletal parameters [ Table 2 ] showed a highly significant low positive correlation with both anterior maxillary height ( r = 0.22, P < 0.001) and posterior maxillary height ( r = 0.216, P < 0.001)., -with angle of inclination of maxilla it showed an insignificant (0.61) low positive correlation (0.039).

Finally, the seasonal moving-average component (MA(12)) is highly significant (coefficient = − 0.821, p < 0.001), with a tight confidence interval from − 1.056 to − 0.586, entirely below zero.

Pain as evidenced by the FIQ VAS was highly significant (p < 0.001).

While this was not observed for stage II and III rectal cancer patients without neoadjuvant therapy, it was highly significant for stage III colon carcinomas ( p < 0.001).

Highly significant differences were observed among the groups with regard to body weight measured on day 20 and day 42 (p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively).

Two-way ANOVA test of these data show that both the effects of the Ala+TIMP-2 treatment and the IBMX are highly significant ( p <0.001) when compared with the control and DETA/NO alone groups.

There was a highly significant improvement in angina 6 months following intervention in normal LVEF group ( p value < 0.001).

Although there was a highly significant treatment effect of ionomycin dose on mPTP ( p ≤ 0.001), there was no dose‐dependent effect of 15 min ionomycin treatment on MMP.

For women, the interactions between age and parental status are highly significant for all health outcomes ( p < 0.001).

Worsening was highly significant when compared to basal values (time sequence ARDS vs. basal value, BV; all p < 0.001 for each parameter respectively, in both lavaged groups), but comparable between the lavaged groups.

2.8 ± 0.2, p < 0.001); (iii) our regression analysis revealed that the TyG index independently predicted diminished CFR values; and (iv) we observed a highly significant negative correlation between the TyG index and CFR values (r = −0.624, p < 0.001).

Bartlett’s test of sphericity has to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) [ 39 ].

The pairwise comparisons of groups with ANOVAs supported these findings ( Table 3 ) and revealed highly significant differences between 4xA and all other groups ( p < 0.001) among all subsets of epiloci.

The observed association was highly significant (p<0.001), indicating a strong correlation between sonoelastography grading and final histopathological diagnosis.

Among the n-6 PUFA, statistically significant differences ( P <0.01) were observed for linoleic fatty acid and ∑n-6 PUFA, and highly significant differences ( P <0.001) were observed for γ -linolenic (C18:3 n-6) and arachidonic fatty acids.

[ 10 ] demonstrated a significant standard difference in means of -3.20, with a standard error of 0.17, leading to a highly significant z-value of -19.16 (p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant, moderate and negative correlation between mind wandering and Attentional Focus ( r = −0.38, p < 0.001).

Reclassification methods also established highly significant improvement ( P < 0.001) for models with biomarkers if clinical covariates were more flexibly adjusted for.

Methylation levels in the antrum and body had a moderate but highly significant correlation (R=0.516; p<0.001) ( figure 2B ).