“highly significant”

All differences observed by this analysis were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The variables DIVt, DIVs, and RICt had absolute loading values greater than 0.4 in the first component (PC1, Table 1 ), and the Pearson correlation test showed a highly significant correlation between DIVt and RICt (correlation = 0.855, p -value < 0.001).

The language accumulation specification for the PPVT score revealed that the number of years spent with bilateral CIs was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) predictor, with its effect moderated by bilateral activation age ( p = 0.033).

On-Task Phoneme Learning Across both groups of participants there was a highly significant improvement with training in phoneme discrimination threshold for all 11 phoneme pairs ( F (1, 3931.1) = 479.1, p < 0.001), shown in Figure 2 .

The two-way ANOVA showed that ZnO NPs concentration had a highly significant effect on hemoglobin release (F = 35.365, p < 0.001), whereas exposure time and the concentration × time interaction were not significant.

Partial correlation analysis between the texture features of the spine and the paraspinal muscles revealed a highly significant correlation for Variance(global) (r = 0.61 for ES, r = 0.62 for PS; p < 0.001 respectively).

Spearman rank correlation between beetle tunnel volume and mass loss was highly significant (p < 0.001) with coefficient ρ = 0.49 (Fig. 4 ).

In contrast, a highly significant difference was documented between SMIC at time point A and C, with a mean value increasing from 1:130 to 1:412 ( p < 0.001).

The difference between two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The competence dimension, reflecting the students’ belief in their capabilities to perform effectively, was markedly higher among the trained group (18.77 ± 2.09) compared to the control group (15.82 ± 4.38), with a highly significant difference (t = 3.81, p < 0.001).

When accounting for the discrepancy in root lengths, WT barley bound 4.8-fold more soil per unit of root length than brb ( Figure 1C ); as indicated by a highly significant ( P < 0.001) genotype*root length interaction.

However, the difference in the IL-6 −174 G>C and IVS3 +281 G>T genotype distribution and allele frequency between black and white women was highly significant after adjusting for BMI group ( p < 0.001).

The difference between glypican-1 expression of the two tumor types was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).

Additionally, RFM had a highly significant positive correlation with FM% (r = 0.751, p < 0.001), and changes in RFM during the lifestyle intervention were significantly correlated with changes in FM% [ 84 ].

Statistical Data Analysis The factorability of the data was checked using Bartlett’s sphericity test, which is highly significant at a 5% level with a p -value < 0.001.

This moderator had a strong and highly significant effect (F (1,160) = 11.19, p = 0.0010).

In terms of how well the PHQ-9, and GAD-7 total scores were associated with the two criterion instruments, the correlations were all highly significant (p <.001).

The differences between the two periods investigated in the present study were highly significant in all the measures, i.e., vigorous and moderate physical activity, walking, and total physical activity ( p < 0.001).

The farm characteristics of farm size, herd size, total, per cow and per hectare milk production each had positive effects on all excreted nutrient loads, with highly significant ( p < 0.001) effects observed for farm size, herd size, and total milk production ( Table 3 ).

Likelihood-ratio tests comparing each model with ordinary logistic regression were highly significant (all p < 0.001).

Three results were highly significant (p-value<0.001) but there nevertheless is a risk of Type I errors.

Haloperidol induced catalepsy MS provides highly significant (p<0.001) protection against haloperidol (1 mg/kg) induced catalepsy as compared to control, up to 180 minutes after intraperitoneal injection of haloperidol.

The receipt of 3 doses of the BNT 162b2 mRNA vaccine was associated with a highly significant 96% reduction in COVID-19 infection (aHR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.27, p = 0.001), a 91% reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 (aHR 0.01-0.71, p = 0.02), a 100% reduction in moderate, severe or critical COVID-19 (aHR 0.00, 95% CI 0.00-0.04, p < 0.001), and a 100% reduction in severe or critical COVID-19 (aHR 0.0, 95% CI 0.00-0.02, p < 0.001) compared to participants who received 2 doses ( Table 4 ).

Rats treated with ISO showed a highly significant increase (p<0.001) in activities of serum marker enzymes compared with the normal rat (NC) group.

With a large sample size (n = 500), the p-value for the difference between the experimental and control groups was highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting that meditation reduced anxiety.