Notably, CKAP2, FCGR1A, and ADCY7 demonstrated highly significant associations with P -values <.001, denoted by 2 asterisks (**), while GABBR1, HLA-DPA, CD37, and PNPLA2 showed significant associations with P -values <.05, marked by one asterisk (*).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The three independent variables generated a highly significant model ( p < 0.001) with a determination coefficient of 0.92 (adjusted R 2 ; root mean squared error (RMSE) = 1.7 K) based on ca. 50 % randomly chosen observations (calibration dataset).
Using a bivariate statistical analysis, we found that the correlation between the increase in CrxGFP donor age and the amount of integrated GFP-expressing photoreceptors was highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Supplementary Material, Fig. 2 C ).
A proposed classification by ABC + Lactate score was highly significant ( p = 0.001), with those in the highest class having ICU mortality of 75% and hospital and 12-month mortality of 93%.
Biological Parameters of White and Yellow Turkey Sperm Significant ( p ≤ 0.05) and highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) differences were observed in the parameters characterising spermatozoa from white and yellow semen.
In the high line, there are highly significant changes in allele frequencies (p<0.001) on 10 chromosomes and significant changes (p<0.05) on 6 additional chromosomes.
Moreover, among female participants, menopausal status demonstrated a highly significant statistical difference ( P < 0.001). 3.2 Screening of metabolic biomarkers We analyzed the associations between 3381 metabolites and Z-/T-score using univariate linear regression.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed highly significant differences in OS between the two groups (log-rank test, P<0.001) ( Figure 5 ).
A highly significant trend towards increasing frequency of AF was consistently observed across RDW quintiles ( P < 0.001).
The difference was highly significant (log-rank P<0.001).
Model 3 (AHEAD): When the AHEAD score was included, it emerged as a powerful and highly significant predictor of heart failure (OR = 1.786, 95% CI: 1.522–2.097, p < 0.001).
The time onset and duration of motor block in Group RD (1.59 ± 0.59, 319.57 ± 64.752), Group RF (1.59 ± 0.53, 236.83 ± 33.797), and Group RC (2.07 ± 0.20, 183.93 ± 35.252) min both are statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Highly significant associations were observed in the prevalence of this gene in isolates from GC patients as compared with isolates from PUD and NUD (P-value <0.001) ( Table 3 ).
In 53 (62.4%) of 85 knees with mild to moderate OA on AP-radiographs (K/L-score ≤ 3), the lateral femorotibial minJSW on the PA-flexed view (2.0 mm, SD 1.1) decreased highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the AP view (0.1 mm) and resulted in an increased K/L-score of 4 (Fig. 1 ).
Our regression model revealed a highly significant time main effect (β=15.10, 95% CI 13.96‐16.25; P <.001), indicating that a substantial increase in maternal weight occurs as pregnancy progresses.
A p value of <0.05 (*) was considered significant, a p value of <0.01 (**) was considered highly significant, and a p value of <0.001 (***) was considered very highly significant.
The correlation in V1 was highly significant, both when using the bootstrap approach ( p < 0.001), and when using a paired t -test [ t (6) = 6.30, p = 0.0004].
The difference in proteinuria between the two groups was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
A highly significant correlation was found between total calcium measured in all lithium-heparin and all citrate plasma aliquots (r = 0.991; p<0.001) ( Fig 1 ).
Statistical significance was set at P < 0,05; results were considered statistically highly significant if p < 0,001.
The interaction effect was found highly significant β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.18, 0.35], t = 6.26, p < .001, which indicated that the relationship between perceived overqualification and deviant behavior was moderated by career stakes (career or survival).
8 ) resulted in a highly significant regression coefficient for the high-concentrate diet ( P < 0.001), but no significant correlation for the medium-concentrate diet ( P > 0.05).
Overall the association was highly significant (Kruskal Wallis test: P < 0.001).
The results revealed that application of higher voltages resulted in a highly significant increase ( P ≤0.001) in the resultant NF diameter ( Table 2 ).
A combined t test between all samples recovered from Stratum I ( n = 24) and the control group shells ( n = 6) indicates a highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference in mean ∆ 47 value between the two populations.