“highly significant”

ANOVA analysis revealed that temperature exerted a highly significant effect on archaeal abundance (F = 45.32, p < 0.001); Fe 3+ concentration also had a significant influence (F = 18.67, p < 0.01), whereas the effect of NO 2 − was relatively weak and not statistically significant (F = 3.21, p > 0.05).

Enterobacter hormaechei exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with N (r = −0.88, p < 0.001), while Pediococcus pentosaceus and Weissella paramesenteroides showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative correlations with R, with correlation coefficients of −0.74 and −0.73, respectively. 4.

[ 10 ] demonstrated a significant standard difference in means of -3.20, with a standard error of 0.17, leading to a highly significant z-value of -19.16 (p < 0.001).

The statistical analysis showed highly significant models for all responses: F-values were 88.82, 98.35, 21.23, and 13.16 for PS, PDI, ZP, and EE%, respectively, with p < 0.001 in all cases, indicating that the chosen factors explain most of the variability in the responses.

Between the groups as well as staining solutions, a highly significant difference was found (P < 0.001).

However, a PERMANOVA confirmed that highly significant differences exist between group centroids ( df = 9, pseudo- F = 26.2, p < 0.001), and subsequent pair-wise post hoc comparisons showed that indeed all centroids differ significantly from one another (see Table 1 ).

A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant. 3.

The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of treatment on mean log reduction (F(8, 235.22) = 1565.49; p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 = 0.85) ( Figure 2 ).

Specifically, chickens in footpad-inoculated Group A showed highly significant differences in BFW compared with the control group ( p < 0.001), followed by Groups B, E, and D, which also showed significant differences ( p < 0.01).

In RT4 cells, LsDE treatment nearly completely abolished colony formation and showed a highly significant reduction compared to its vehicle control ( p < 0.001), demonstrating strong suppression of clonogenic survival.

Attitude had a strong and highly significant effect on purchase intention (H4: β = 0.736, t = 20.679, p < 0.001), explaining 54.1% of the variance in purchase intention (R 2 = 0.541). 5.

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 2349.67, df = 231, p < 0.001), confirming that the correlation matrix was not an identity matrix and that the variables were sufficiently interrelated for factor extraction.

Correlation of UCE Capture with Specimen Age and DNA Quality We found that all investigated variables (pre-library DNA concentration, post-library DNA concentration, raw read count, UCE locus count, UCE mean contig length and UCE reads on target) decreased with increasing specimen age, and this negative correlation was highly significant in all cases (R = -0.36–0.75 and p < 0.001; Table 2 , Fig 2A–2E ).

The validity of the HIT has been supported in relation to numerous constructs, including the ability to distinguish delinquent from non-delinquent populations, and highly significant ( p < .001) positive correlations with measures of externalizing behavior ( r = .52), aggressive behavior ( r = .38), antisocial behavior ( r = .55), delinquent behavior ( r = .41), and low empathy ( r = .42) (Gini and Pozzoli 2013 ).

Case Fatality Rate Trend Poisson regression analysis demonstrated a highly significant annual decline in case fatality rate (RR 0.976 per year, 95% CI 0.973–0.978; p < 0.001), corresponding to an average reduction of 2.4% per year.

HPES groups) two-way ANOVA on CPCN after priming revealed that the main effect for Priming was not significant ( F < 1), whereas the main effect for Explanatory Style was highly significant, F (1,110) = 15.19, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.121.

For metabolism, a highly significant overall treatment effect was found (PMT: F(7, 41.506) = 42.829, p < 0.001), and this effect was even more pronounced for viability (PVA: F(7, 39.861) = 88.926, p < 0.001), indicating that viability provided high sensitivity for treatment discrimination.

ANOVA revealed highly significant treatment effects on disease progression parameters [F(8,18) = 1778.20, p < 0.001].

The association between CL H and CL L in patients with HCCC A highly significant correlation was observed between in vivo metabolic activity and enzyme activity based on liver tissues for the 10 CYPs (all P values <0.001; Figure 7 ).

This model showed that there was a highly significant moderated effect ( Figure 6 , P<0.001).

SCFF at 250 μg/mL produced a highly significant 47% increase in HGF expression ( p < 0.001).

The mean PW was smaller in females than in males at all levels, and this difference was very highly significant at all levels ( P < 0.001).

The rate of death or an adverse cardiovascular event was 13.2% lower, in absolute terms, for patients treated with high‐consistency testing (49.0%), a difference that was highly significant across testing consistency categories (log rank, P <0.001).

All regression analyses were highly significant ( p ≤ 001).

Plant height, number of stems per hill, and stem girth (diameter) Plant height: analysis of variance shows that there is a very highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in plant height among accessions.