“highly significant”

Highly significant differences were observed among clones ( p < 0.001) and locations ( p < 0.001).

RESULTS Cell type, culture method, and fatty acid treatment main effects There were highly significant differences (p<0.001) between IPA and BSC for AMPKα , C/EBPβ , CPT1β , PPARγ , and SCD gene expression ( Table 2 ).

In contrast, the degree of lateral incisor rotation had a highly significant effect on perceived attractiveness ( F = 35.796; df = 3,348; p < 0.001; Table 3 ).

A highly significant relationship (p <0.001) was found between the participants’ BMI category and the gender.

Using Fritz & Purvis’s D-metric [ 44 ] as our measure of phylogenetic signal, where D = 1 indicates no phylogenetic structure to the trait data and D = 0 indicates strong correlation between trait distribution and phylogeny (see methods for full description), we found the degree of phylogenetic signal in succulence per se was highly significant (D = 0.132, p < 0.001).

In total, the percentage of overlap of recapture stretches with those of other individuals of the same sex was 14.4% while the overlap with individuals of the other sex was 59.2%, a difference that was highly significant ( W = 6482.5, p < 0.001).

The regression coefficients were highly significant for samples A1, A3 and A5 ( P < 0.001), with R2 values of 0.982, 0.959, and 0.905, respectively.

Statistical analysis For data in Figs 3A(ii), B(ii) , 4B and C , non-parametric ANOVA (Kruskal–Wallis) tests revealed highly significant differences ( P < 0.001).

Additionally, a strong and highly significant negative correlation was observed between commercial origin and LC ( r = −0.694, p < 0.001), indicating that imported supplements exhibit lower compliance with labeling regulations compared to locally produced ones.

Both groups had highly significant within-group improvement in MRMI, BBS and MBI ( p < 0 . 001 ).

One-way ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of the material on dye penetration (p < 0.001).

For the two results, we find a highly significant spatial (grid space) correlation, with Pearson's r -test correlation coefficient 2 , r = 0.99 [99.9%CI, p < 0.001] showing that differences are generally small.

Gender distribution showed no significant difference between the two groups ( p = 0.6243), while prognostic status showed highly significant differences between the two groups ( p < 0.001), directly validating the prognostic prediction capability of the risk score model.

Adaptation effects were highly significant in both the congruent and incongruent conditions (both t -tests p < 0.001).

In contrast, the LDM global test of significance evaluating the effect of HIV was highly significant for both blood (p = 0.001) and rectal mucosa (p = 0.0002).

Wilcoxon signed-rank tests confirmed highly significant reductions in MADRS total scores compared with baseline at all follow-ups (all adjusted p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S1 ).

For the final 24-item-model, all factor loadings were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001) and acceptable, excepted for KNO_HM3 (0.393) and KNO_KB2a (0.404; see Fig. 1 ).

After adjusting for baseline GAD-7 scores, marital status, and residence using ANCOVA, the group difference remained highly significant, F (1, 146) = 42.8, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.226, with adjusted mean difference of 4.4 points (95% CI 3.2, 5.6) and adjusted means of 6.4 ( SE = 0.4) for the VR group versus 10.8 ( SE = 0.4) for the control group.

It was highly significant (p<0.001).

For all groups, we observed highly significant linear inverse correlations between IMT or plaque thickness and FMD measurements as measured at the identical site in BA ( r =−0.69, P <0.001) ( Figure 1 A) and SFA ( r =−0.74, P <0.001) ( Figure 1 B).

Our results showed a highly significant expression of DMP1 (4.86‐fold; p < 0.001), NRF1 (1.66‐fold; p < 0.02) and RUNX2 (1.5‐fold; p < 0.05) in HSV‐1‐infected hPDLSCs compared to uninfected hPDLCs cultured in osteogenic media (Figure 4B ).

A highly significant correlation was observed among various carotenoids in the feed ( p < 0.001).

However, their combined application was highly significant ( P = 0.001) .

These were highly significant using Mantel's test ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant differences were observed for calcium (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 42.8, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.368, and phosphorus (mg/dL), F(2, 147) = 53.6, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.422, with post-hoc comparisons indicating significant differences between all groups.