The KMO value of 0.853 indicated strong sampling adequacy, and the highly significant result from Bartlett’s Test ( P < .001) confirmed that the correlations among variables were sufficient to proceed with factor analysis.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a highly significant difference among the three genotypes in this parameter (Kruskal-Wallis test H 2,313 = 14.89, p<0.001).
Analysis of molecular variance revealed a low level of genetic differentiation but this was highly significant (p<0.001) among the cattle populations.
Applied on the whole cohort of 477 patients, a highly significant association ( P <0.001, log-rank test) between high CRP levels and poor OS could be determined ( Figure 1 ).
The median aPTT was 46.4 s (IQR 31.4–61.4 s), with a highly significant linear correlation between aPTT and anti‐Xa activity (Figure 4 ; R 2 = 0.69, p >.001).
However, a highly significant interaction was observed between MedDietScore and IBI on 10-year diabetes risk (p < 0.001).
For the CMI, overall differences across tertiles were highly significant (log-rank P < 0.001).
This difference was highly significant, as evidenced by a chi-square statistic of 142.8 ( df = 1, p < 0.001, Fig. 4 a).
Overexpression of the lnc-MBL2-4:3 (OTTHUMT00000048112) in the tongue SCC was highly significant in comparison with the paired normal epithelia ( P < 0.001, Wilcoxon Signed Ranked test).
Rats treated with ISO showed a highly significant increase (p<0.001) in activities of serum marker enzymes compared with the normal rat (NC) group.
Haloperidol induced catalepsy MS provides highly significant (p<0.001) protection against haloperidol (1 mg/kg) induced catalepsy as compared to control, up to 180 minutes after intraperitoneal injection of haloperidol.
This non-linear association was highly significant (R2 = 0.523, P < 0.001).
The final multivariate model showed a highly significant improvement in goodness-of-fit compared to the intercept-only model (Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square = 211.699, p < 0.001).
hyo culture) at final time (96 h of co-culture) and highly significant differences in one-way ANOVA (p-value < 0.001).
However, the difference in the IL-6 −174 G>C and IVS3 +281 G>T genotype distribution and allele frequency between black and white women was highly significant after adjusting for BMI group ( p < 0.001).
There was a negative, moderate, and highly significant correlation between MTSN and JPS ( r = -0.645, p < 0.001).
In contrast, a highly significant difference was documented between SMIC at time point A and C, with a mean value increasing from 1:130 to 1:412 ( p < 0.001).
On-Task Phoneme Learning Across both groups of participants there was a highly significant improvement with training in phoneme discrimination threshold for all 11 phoneme pairs ( F (1, 3931.1) = 479.1, p < 0.001), shown in Figure 2 .
The language accumulation specification for the PPVT score revealed that the number of years spent with bilateral CIs was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) predictor, with its effect moderated by bilateral activation age ( p = 0.033).
However, at 72 h treatments, H1N1 infection exhibited highly significant expression levels of these cytokines compared to the simvastatin-treated supernatants (P≤0.001).
At 1 year post-transplant, survival rates were markedly lower in the positive group [62.0% (49/80)] compared to the negative group [86.9% (139/160)], with a highly significant difference (χ 2 = 19.456, P < 0.001).
The Chi-square analysis revealed a highly significant difference among the three groups in the number of attempts required for successful SAB placement in obese patients ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].
Figure 1 presents mean ± SE SDLP values recorded after placebo and zopiclone 7.5 mg for each group separately. Analysis showed a highly significant overall treatment effect on SDLP ( F 1,45 = 33.86, p < 0.001).
The difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating that it is a true and reproducible discrepancy.
As the tests showed, highly significant differences were observed in the decrease in the Dikkers, Derkay and Numerical scales (p < 0.001) and in the VHI general score ( p = 0.006), while significant decreases were observed in the functional VHI ( p = 0.014) and physical VHI ( p = 0.021) subscales, see Table 1 .