“highly significant”

This analysis found no main effect but a highly significant interaction ( p < 0.001).

The random effect for farm nested within district was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The Wilcoxon signed-rank test shows a highly significant difference between participation in each type of activity ( Z = −6.05, p < 0.001).

Comparing the FABP1 cDNA transfected cells to the vector transfected cells at AAP concentrations of 0.5 mM, 1.0 mM, 5 mM, and 10 mM showed highly significant differences at the p < 0.001 level, while an AAP concentration of 20 mM was significant at the p < 0.01 level.

The H obs values differed significantly among breeds (1-way ANOVA), and all pairwise comparisons of H obs were also highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The mixed model analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of species and of treatment on T leaf ( Table 1 ; p < 0.001).

Differences between the clusters were highly significant for all parameters by ANOVA ( p ≤ 0.001), and significant differences were seen between Cluster 1 ( n = 26), Cluster 2 ( n = 59) and Cluster 3 ( n = 57) by Bonferroni post hoc test ( p ≤ 0.01), except for transferrin and serum iron.

nagoyae populations for both the ITS region ( F st = 0.63608) and LSU rDNA ( F st = 0.63172) were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

As expected, there was a highly significant difference between the two groups in AQ ( t (36) = 7.9, p < 0.001).

In addition, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed between pneumonia-risk score and the expected survival, thus confirming pulmonary infections as a major cause of death in OLT recipients.

One group demonstrated a highly significant (>200-fold; P < 0.001) induction of anti-ClfA IgG2a titers when mice were vaccinated with ClfA and c-di-GMP as compared with vaccination with ClfA alone ( Karaolis et al., 2007a ).

The RC versus SC comparison in Table 1 shows that the probability of correctly assigning a resistant or susceptible individual to the correct group is better than 98%; this value differs from random allocations (50:50) by a highly significant ( p < 0.001) margin.

The mean reduction at 6 months follow up in the patients compared to baseline in the parameters like AST (50.31%), ALT (48.77%) and TG (59.71%) was highly significant ( p <0.001).

All factor loadings were highly significant ( p <.001).

The effect of the compounds on membrane stabilization was also determined which showed that compounds 4APZ (120 and 240 mg/kg doses), 4APZAB (160 mg/kg) and 4APZVn (600 mg/kg) produced highly significant inhibition ( P < 0.001) of hypotonicity-induced haemolysis.

Fertilization treatments were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and T0 and TMIN had the higher value of biomass (on average, 2.46 kg m −2 ), T100 + 50 produced an average of 1.99 kg m −2 (−24.0% compared to T0).

Correlations were two sided and considered as statistically significant when p ≤0.05 and highly significant when p <0.001.

The omnibus test of moderators was highly significant (QM df=13 = 74.5, p ‐value < 0.001), suggesting that the included moderators explain significant variability in the model (Viechtbauer 2010 ).

The intergroup comparison showed a highly significant difference (Z = −4.189, P < 0.001) (Table 5 ).

3.2 Correlations between environments and variables In the DH population, the correlation between environments for GLS DS was positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Supplementary Table S2 ).

Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed that the differences between the FPS scores in both vignette conditions were highly significant (Z = −34.66, p<0.001) indicating a higher level of negative attitudes towards overweight and obesity.

For example, the association with age was highly significant ( p <0.001) in all scenarios requiring 10 hours minimum wear-time per day but non-significant ( p >0.05) in the scenario requiring 12 hours minimum wear-time per day and at least 5 days with no requirements on weekends.

Thus, at all three time points, expressing hybrid-toxin reduced the LC 50 to a significantly greater extent than AaIT1 ( P < 0.001), and combining AaIT1and hybrid-toxin further reduced effective conidial dose by a highly significant extent ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3 ).

Subgroup without pre-study hospitalization Analysis of the subcohort without pre-study hospitalization history ( n = 387) revealed a highly significant association between treatment adherence and rehospitalization (χ2 = 23.68, P < 0.001).

Statistical significance thresholds were established as follows: P < 0.05 for significant differences, P < 0.01 for highly significant differences, and P < 0.001 for extremely significant differences.