“highly significant”

Significant values were denoted by (*) p < 0.05, significant; (**) p < 0.01, highly significant; and (***) p < 0.001, very highly significant. 3.

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.8216 and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ2 = 2521.078, df = 22, p < 0.001), demonstrating that the factor analysis was adequate to the data. 2.3.

BIV and HIRRV infections showed highly significant ( p < 0.01), and IHNV infection showed extremely significant differences ( p < 0.001), but infection with LCDV showed no significant difference from the control group ( p > 0.05) ( Figure 9 B).

For both nationalities and both genders, scorpions were fixated upon the most frequently, followed by spiders, while grasshoppers were fixated upon the least frequently (comparisons between levels of animal factors within both nationalities and genders were all highly significant with p -value < 0.001).

The experimental data fitted well to the model, as the convergence criterion was met on average after 6.25 iterations, all models were highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the errors for the estimated parameters were lower than 2%.

Moreover, highly significant associations between the re-treatment rate and the mean age, CCI, season, and level of care were also observed ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

Kallikren-1 All also is highly significant ( p < 0.001) for three of the four sets of models, except for M1a vs.

As can be noted, there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) interaction between job task and age.

Patients in the azithromycin arm had a 4.4% improvement on their FEV 1 as compared to a 1.8% decrease in patients in the placebo arm—a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001).

The CH25H expression levels showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001), the CH25H mRNA expression level in the metastatic group was significantly down-regulated in LUAD compared to the non-metastatic group (Fig. 1 B).

For evaluation of horizontal deviation, the manual PACT measurement and automated eye track system show a highly significant positive correlation (r = 0.932, P < 0.001, Fig. 2 ).

The latency to find the reward during the retrieval trials revealed a highly significant training effect (Fig. 1 d, F 2.9,66.9 = 6.45, p = 0.001) and the linear trend was also significant (F 1,23 = 14.94, p = 0.001).

The ANOVA results revealed that the type of retrograde filling material had a highly significant influence ( P < 0.001) on the push-out bond strength of Zirconomer subgroups when compared to Bioactive bone cement and MTA Angelus, and the statistical analysis of data revealed that the push-out bond strength of Zirconomer subgroups was highly significant when compared to Bioactive bone cement and MTA Angelus [ P < 0.001; Table 1 ].

There was also a highly significant effect of Task at pre‐intervention for control items, where Definition Production was significantly below ( p < 0.001), and Definition Recognition significantly above ( p < 0.001) the grand mean for all tasks.

The in-hospital case-fatality rate for patients with Down syndrome was 23.7% and was 8.2% for patients without Down syndrome, and the difference was highly significant (p<0.001).

When comparing serum CTx between baseline and day 8, all patients experienced a decrease in CTx levels, and this was highly significant (p < 0.001) as shown in Figure 3B .

In applying a convolutional neural network to estimate brain and cerebrospinal fluid intracellular volume, Qin et al [ 16 ] reported highly significant correlations (all p <0.001) between uncertainty estimations and observed error based on ground truth values.

The effect of taxonomic classes was found to be highly significant (F-value = 28.11, df = 6, p-value < 0.001).

All results were highly significant (p<0.001).

The overall regression equation showed that the value of F was 46.556, with 9 and 190 df, was highly significant P value = .001.

Results: The quantity of asymmetry revealed that there was a highly significant improvement ( P < 0.001) in nasal asymmetry at T1–T2 and T1–T3.

The KMO measure of sampling adequacy was .830 and Bartlett’s test of sphericity highly significant ( p < 0.001).

In the second experiment, a Tunisian cell line (Hessiene) cryopreserved in ISF-1 with 5%[v/v] dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) grewbetter after thawing in RPMI-FBS compared to ISF-1 with a highly significant difference in cell growth ( p < 0.001), whereas the third experiment showed that the Ankara cell line had similar growth characteristics in both RPMI-FBS and ISF-1 before and after thawing, with a shorter generation doubling time in ISF-1 than in RPMI-FBS ( p = 0.23).

At one month, a highly significant decrease occurred in VAS and ODI in the lidocaine and ozone groups compared to the botulinum toxin group ( p < 0.001).

We can see from the highly significant estimated coefficient of 0.858 (t = 38.118, p < 0.001) that one of these duplicating items should be deleted.