“highly significant”

Sliding-window results from population genetic analyses provided highly significant (p<0.001) signatures for balancing selection specifically in the third intron (e.g.

With the data for all 16 of the faces, the effect of congruency was marginal for young adults [ χ 2 (2) = 5.08, p = .08], but highly significant for older adults [ χ 2 (2) = 24.52, p < .001].

The effects of chronic stress and guanfacine on spine density Comparisons of spine density across all four groups indicated a highly significant effect of group for distal apical spines (F(3,18) = 20.14, p < 0.001).

In a multivariate model combining the 48-genes predictor, age, sex and blood cell composition, the 48-genes predictor remained highly significant of severe outcome against mild outcome (logistic regression p- value < 0.001; Table 2 ).

Wilks' lambda test, which checks the linear relationship between the predictors and the grouping variable (i.e., the validity of the analysis) was highly significant (P < 0.001).

Further sensitivity analysis results showed that the association between TyG-derived indicators and DM was still highly significant ( p < 0.001), and the effect amount was consistent with the main analysis ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

Furthermore, combining the expression levels of ESM1 and Pan-kla allowed for highly significant stratification of ovarian cancer patients into four distinct risk strata with markedly different prognoses (overall P < 0.001, Fig. 3 C).

In addition, group (D) results showed highly significant values than other groups with lower mean values except for UC-MSCs and group (C) (p<0.001).

RESULTS Acetic acid-induced writhing test In acetic acid-induced writhing test, clavulanic acid at doses of 10 and 20 mg/kg significantly ( p <0.05) inhibited acetic acid-induced abdominal constrictions and a highly significant decrease was seen at dose of 40 mg/kg ( p <0.001).

Results: Highly significant increase was found in cathepsin L expression in AD and LP patients compared to controls [ P = 0.001].

After cleaning the phone surfaces with a 70% isopropanol solution, the baseline contamination rate of 90.4% was reduced to 14.0%, showing highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).

There are highly significant differences between K and RT ( t (df = 44) = 12.795, p < 0.001), between K and RT FL ( t (df = 44) = 10.064, p < 0.001), between D K and MD FL ( t (44) = 8.511, p < 0.001), and between D K and MD ( t (44) = 9.227, p < 0.001).

Differences were considered to be significant if P <.05 and highly significant if P <.001.

Analysis of variance revealed highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) and significant ( p ≤ 0.05) genotypic differences for most traits under both moisture regimes.

The results indicated that 5% of HA gel showed highly significant papilla enhancement ( p = 0.001) at 6 months compared with lower concentrations.

A moderate but highly significant positive correlation was observed between ALT and AST levels (r = 0.50, p < 0.001), reflecting their frequent co-elevation in the setting of hepatocellular injury.

The primary marker of kidney health, ACR, demonstrated a highly significant reduction from 108.44 to 65.79 ( P < 0.001).

GEI had a highly significant effect on grain yield ( p < 0.001) but minimal impact on Fe and Zn concentrations.

Glucometer readings revealed the same pattern of highly significant decrease in both FBG and RBG in NS group (p<0.001) and no significant change in control group compared to the baseline values ( Fig. 2 & Fig. 3 ).

The dataset was highly suitable for dimension reduction, as indicated by a Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy of 0.860 and a highly significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity ( P < 0.001).

The effect of time was highly significant ( P < 0.001), with the difference between the groups emerging at about 3 h and increasing throughout the test (Fig. 3 ).

The increases among CC010 and a highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase among CC037 were also observed when mice of these lines were maintained on a HFD.

In the best-supported model (ΔAICc < 2), PC1 (bamboo structure) and PC2 (tree structure) exerted highly significant positive effects on habitat utilization (PC1: β = 4.023, p = 0.001; PC2: β = 3.321, p = 0.002).

The estimated F ST value in the hierarchical AMOVA based on the two units was 0.193, which was highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Table S2 ).

Highly significant differences were observed between baseline and after stages for both congruent (air: Z = −4.675, p < 0.001; heliox: Z = −2.985, p = 0.003; trimix: Z = −3.650, p < 0.001) and incongruent trials (air: Z = −4.200, p < 0.001; heliox: Z = −3.299, p < 0.001; trimix: Z = −3.154, p = 0.002).