“highly significant”

The results showed that the main effect was highly significant, F (1,76) = 71.199, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.487.

However, on the basis of the MRS total score and the individual domains, highly significant results with regard to the total score ( p < 0.001) and significant results with regard to the somatovegetative and urogenital domains ( p < 0.05) remained (Table 8 ).

Including response retrieval as the only level 1 predictor yields a large and highly significant retrieval effect, β = −28.34, t (104,122) = −41.01, p < .001.

Regarding the Demoralization Scale (DS), the difference between the two groups was statistically highly significant (F=1.49; t=9.44; p<0.001, d=1.6).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that drought, cultivar, and their interaction had highly significant effects on all measured traits ( p < 0.001; Supplementary File 1: Table S3 ).

However, when patients from each group were sub-divided into those presenting with VAP or not during the course of their hospitalization, there were significant differences within the placebo and probiotic groups: placebo-treated patients who did not experience VAP [no-VAP group] were found to have a statistically highly significant increase in neutrophils [ p < 0.001] between days 0 and 7; and the same was observed in the probiotics/no-VAP group.

Table 7 shows that the multiple regression model was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that the predictors jointly influence the perceived benefits and barriers of eating healthy foods.

The lowest values of index tests, the ROMA and SRR, were found in women with benign masses, with the differences between this group and both borderline and early stage malignancies being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin value was 0.96, and the findings of the Barlett test were highly significant (χ 2 = 19,783.37; df = 1398; p < 0.001).

Only modHI and modCI showed a highly significant difference regarding their reduced O 2 -pulse max % (ROC analyses: modHI, p ≤ 0.001, modCI, p ≤ 0.001).

All these differences were highly significant (McNemar’s chi-square test p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively).

Conversely, both financial SEB proxies showed a highly significant association in the unadjusted model (model 1) (both: p < 0.001).

The results presented a highly significant decrease in IL-6 and TNF-α secretion in III and IV when they were treated with asiaticoside (*** p < 0.001) compared to the control and untreated group II.

The discrepancy between data of the TWL obtained from control and CFA treated rats was also highly significant (*** p < 0.001) ( Figure 1B ). 3.3.

The linear relationship between digestibility coefficients from the 2 databases was highly significant, an R 2 of 0.810 ( P < 0.001).

Co-administration of a non-toxic concentration of sodium formate (0–2 mM), as a reducing agent and hydride donor, alongside catalyst 1 resulted in a highly significant enhancement of the cytotoxic potency of catalyst 1 by up to 60% towards MCF7 breast cancer cells ( p < 0.001, Fig. 2 and Supplementary Information Table S4).

There is a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between PKCα and TGFβR1 mRNA expression levels in human colon tumor samples, implying co-occurrence of loss of expression of the two kinases in tumors ( Fig. 11 A i).

The difference is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Here, the paired Mann–Whitney U test revealed a statistically highly significant difference between the 2D- and 3D-measured fracture areas (*** p < 0.001, Figure 3 A,B).

Effect of HLA alleles on the relation of SD ( r ′ ) versus age There was a highly significant, positive overall dependence of SD ( r ′ ) on age ( Figure 1 ; P < .001).

Multivariable modeling of day 30 anti-RBD level in KTRs incorporating TCR measures revealed a positive association of day 30 spike-specific CD4 + T cell breadth (aRatio = 1.05 2.05 4.02 [per 1 log], P = .037) and a highly significant negative association of high-dose MMF (aRatio= 0.02 0.06 0.18 , P < .001) after accounting for transplant vintage.

The differences in mean surface roughness values between chlorhexidine and coffee were highly significant (p-value<0.001) irrespective of the composite used.

There was a substantial variation ( p ≤ 0.05) in ALT level and a highly significant difference ( p ≤ 0.001) in alkaline phosphatase (ALP).

The difference between regions, while small on average, was highly significant across individuals (for example, between the angular and Heschl’s gyri: Δ k * = 2.5 ± 0.3, P < 0.001) and observed in both the left and right hemispheres (Fig. 3b ).

Y values did not show highly significant correlation with pressure (R = 0.23 p < 0.001 FM, R = 0.12 p < 0.05 DM) and tau/frost-point (R = 0.14 p < 0.05 FM, R = 0.065 p = 0.1 DM) (Fig.