“highly significant”

Statistical analysis of the wound-healing assay revealed a highly significant, dose-dependent effect of the treatment on the measured wound area ( p <0.001).

Both factors were highly significant ( P < 0.001), as was the interaction ( P < 0.001; Fig. 2 ), indicating that bacterial inoculation significantly ( P < 0.01) stimulated growth of the WT and eto1-1 plants but not the etr1-1 and ein2-1 mutants ( Fig. 2 ).

Critically, the cross-over interaction between the Target Type and the Prime Type was highly significant, F 1 (2, 30) = 14.17, MS e = 44.37, p <.001; F 2 (2, 56) = 12.97, MS e = 63.49, p <.001.

The independent t -test revealed a highly significant difference between the groups (t = 12.75, P < 0.001), indicating that the enamel surface coating effectively reduced the staining caused by the iron-containing supplement.

Data harmonization Before data harmonization, ANCOVA results showed highly significant differences in MRI‐derived volumes among different INNI centers ( p ‐values <10 −3 for all structures except for NT2LV in the training/validation set and p ‐values <10 −2 for all structures except for NT2LV and NCaudmV in the test set).

Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) were observed between samples collected in 2008 and samples from all the sampling dates of 2009 with values ranging from 0.103 to 0.180 ( Table 3 ).

Results EGCG exhibited a statistically significant cytotoxic effect at concentrations above 10 μM ( p < 0.005), with highly significant effects observed at 25 and 50 μM ( p < 0.001).

According to the p -value, differences were considered as significant ( p < 0.05) or highly significant ( p < 0.001). 3.

In patients with sepsis, creatinine was a highly significant marker of AKI ( p < 0.001), followed by endostatin ( p = 0.001).

It was presented that only clinical stage and the risk score were remarkably related to LUAD patient’s prognosis ( p < 0.05), and only the risk score displayed a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 6B ).

At six months, there was a highly significant difference in the CAL ( p < 0.001).

Measuring respiration rate in flies housed under laboratory conditions A highly significant gender effect on BM was observed, with female flies being significantly heavier ( F = 700.8, P < 0.001; Fig. 3 A) compared to males, although no significant treatment ( F = 0.589, P = 0.560) or sex × treatment interaction effect ( P > 0.05) was seen.

Moreover, participants with asthma demonstrated a higher prevalence of COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis (COPD, Emphysema, ChB) (31.1%) than their counterparts without asthma (6.8%), with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

A nonlinear relationship between NLR and inpatient gout recurrence was identified ( Figures 2E, F ), with P values for nonlinearity being highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The correlation was weak ( r = −.18) but highly significant ( p < .001), given the large sample size.

There was a highly significant effect of subgenus on species mortality (P<0.001), where 54 seedlings were lost from subgenus Eucalyptus and 31 from subgenus Symphyomyrtus .

We observed highly significant decreases in BW (−6.5%, p < 0.001), and LLLS volume (−22.3%, p < 0.001) and an amelioration of patient clinical status.

Results Evolutionary allometry The multivariate regression of Procrustes coordinates (PRC) on centroid size (CS) is highly significant ( F 1, 42 = 32.18; P <0.001), accounting for 12.93% of total shape variation ( Fig. 2 ).

Highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) differences were found among all nutrigenetic traits of polyvoltine silkworm strains in the experimental groups.

All groups on all days showed highly significant sucrose preference (1-tailed unpaired t-test, p < 0.001).

In contrast, G3 showed a highly significant increase from 53.0 to 64.7 mg/dL ( p < 0.001), a Δ% of 26.1% (95% CI: 17.5 to 34.7%).

DGRP 517, whose developmental timing is highly sensitive to rapamycin, had a low fold change of −2.36 ( Figure 2 H), with a highly significant decrease in elongation at 2 dpi in rapamycin-treated flies compared with the control ( p = 0.001) ( Figure 2 I).

The ANOVA result remained highly significant ( p < 0.001) when considering the valence dimension as well.

There was no statistical difference in their agreement on biostatistics being a difficult subject ( P = 0.1) when comparison was made between different academic positions whereas there was a highly significant difference among the proportion of staff (39.5%) in comparison to PG students (27.1%) regarding the confidence of designing their own research projects ( P < 0.001).

On the contrary, the differences between sucrose and water acceptance were highly significant inside the hive (z ratio = 3.751, p = 0.001).