“highly significant”

Both immediate post-intervention and follow-up results revealed a highly significant improvement in the green transformational leadership knowledge levels ( p < 0. 001).

There was a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001) between the values obtained in short‐axis and long‐axis views for the parameter LA diameter (longitudinal: 0.96±0.07 cm; transversal: 0.94±0.1 cm), a very significant correlation ( P < 0.01) for the parameter LVDs (Longitudinal: 0.56±0.2 cm; transversal: 0.69±0.2 cm), and s

The difference was highly significant ( P < .001).

Viral abundance increased for all treatments over time ( f = 48.02, p < 0.001) and between enrichment steps ( f = 12.66, p < 0.001) with a highly significant interaction ( f = 6.78, p < 0.001).

high) revealed highly significant differences among the edible and inedible food categories ( p < 0.001) as well as interacting effects with low and high intensity ( p < 0.001) for pleasantness and edibility ratings.

A highly significant decrease in apoptosis was noted in the groups treated exclusively with O 3 (0.06 ± 0.001%) when compared to the control group (0.28 ± 0.03%; p < 0.001).

The SUVmean derived from PET/CT and PET/MRI also revealed a strong and highly significant correlation (R = 0.87; p<0.001, Fig 3b ).

A statistically highly significant improvement ( P <0.001) in SVa and SVaG from preoperative-to-postoperative level was observed in both groups ( Table 1 ).

The condition effect for arousal was highly significant [ F (2,117) = 318.85, p < 0.001].

The AGT rs5050 variant remained highly significant for both SBP (AC: B = 13.91, 95% CI: 9.63–18.19, p < 0.001; CC: B = 15.18, 95% CI: 6.40–23.95, p < 0.001) as shown in Table 2 , and DBP (AC: B = 10.49, 95% CI: 7.75–13.22, p < 0.001; CC: B = 7.15, 95% CI: 1.55–12.76, p = 0.013).

Principal component analysis The factor analysis’ validity has been proved by the Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, with highly significant results ( χ 2 = 1,815.60, df = 378, p < 0.001), which showed adequate sampling and nonlinearity of factors.

Results Agronomical and physiological traits For SM2, KS and TKW the genotype x environment (GxE) interaction was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in both growing seasons, whereas for GY, PH, and KM2 was only in one growing season (Table 1 ).

In the eccentric phase, the magnitude r was almost perfect for RKF (0.907–0.961), for RKE, LKE and LKF it was very large (0.875–0.962), all results were highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Similarly, for non-neurosurgical complication, highly significant predictors included age (aOR 1.052 per year, p < 0.001), Infection (aOR 6.064, p < 0.001), and trauma (aOR 3.217, p < 0.001), while female sex had a non-significant aOR of 0.912 (p = 0.705). 5.5 Subgroup analysis of ICU admission The independent effect of sex on ICU utilization appeared concentrated in higher-risk procedures.

59.7% H 2 O 2 control), which represented highly significant increases of 63.6 and 75.1% in cell viability (p < 0.001).

Differences between the extracts were highly significant (p < 0.001).

The inland districts would earn very highly significant income (p<0.001); Nakaseke and Nakasongola had the potential to earn 38.6% and 34.1% of the grand total earned by all study districts, respectively, as compared to districts along international borders.

A one-way ANOVA confirmed a highly significant main effect of condition on ΔHR (F(4, 195) = 317.785, p < 0.001).

Due to a highly significant decrease in native SR ( p < 0.001, large effect size), the overall native SR declined markedly, even though non-native SR increased notably.

In comparison, EQ showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001), with an effect size about twice as large (0.30) as that for SQ, for the comparison of autistic females and autistic males.

It is clear that the net effect of gender on the increasing level of HCE is negative and highly significant [ß = -0.148; p<0.001; 95% CI (-0.206, -0.091)]; that is, spending on major morbidity is less likely for females than for males.

Similarly, incorporating H‐FABP into the revised Mayo 2012 Stage increased the C‐index from 0.611 to 0.66 ( p = 0.032) and yielded a highly significant IDI of 0.074 (95% CI: 0.010–0.166, p < 0.001).

In both Inuit men and women and among the Swedish fishermen the area of residence was of highly significant importance (all p-values<0.001) for the POP concentrations (Tables 5 and 6 ).

Results Two-way analysis of variance showed that the contaminant type as the main factor was statistically non-significant ( p =0.655), cleaner type as the main factor was highly significant ( p <0.001), and interaction between the contaminant and cleaner was non-significant ( p =0.51).

Both groups had highly significant within-group improvement in MRMI, BBS and MBI ( p < 0 . 001 ).