“highly significant”

A one-way ANOVA established that there was a highly significant difference between the concentrations of ssDNA released when spores were treated with varying microwave exposures for DS1813 ( p = 0.000), and DS1684 ( p = 0.035).

But in the case, DSG3 marker detection, an almost perfect agreement between both the observers, was seen with an ICC value of 0.921 and it is highly significant with a P value = 0.000.

A significant positive association (p=0.007) was observed between birthweight and BMI; additionally, adjusting for age and gender, the association with BMI was highly significant (p=0.000).

Contrastingly, a study found that the mean knowledge scores of dental and pharmacy students were 114.375 ± 26.386 and 48 ± 30.0856, respectively, with a highly significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.000) [ 38 ].

The moderation analysis showed that PDs with a non-traditional format have a highly significant effect on self-efficacy ( g = 0.820, p = 0.000) and PDs with a traditional format have a modestly significant effect on self-efficacy ( g = 0.462, p = 0.000).

Both tests yielded highly significant p-values (p = 0.000).

Bartlett's test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (190) = 2386; p = 0.00).

Comparison between quantification methods A highly significant difference was observed between the conventional Myers and Montgomery method and the lyophilization method across all three rotary systems ( P = 0.000).

The difference is statistically highly significant ( t = 5.93, p < 0.000) and with respect to effect size almost large (d = 0.70).

The WHODHAS scores are highly significant across all dimensions ( p = 0.000).

A statistical highly significant association ( p =0.000) was found between the age of the patients and the vertical position of impacted canines ( Table 2 ).

Mean caries distribution was found to be statistically highly significant among maxillary anterior and mandibular posterior segments ( P = 0.000 and P = 0.001, respectively) [ Table 5 ].

carvifolia showed a highly significant statistical difference ( P = 0.000) in comparison with the rol B and rol C transgenics (Table 1 ).

The student’s knowledge and awareness on cancer education scores were highly significant ( p = 0.000).

In terms of the efficacy of each treatment in reducing Xcc symptoms, which was calculated based on the symptom severity scores as described in section 2.9, analysis of our data revealed a very highly significant difference between the treatments ( p = 0.000) ( Figure 10 ).

The association between graft loss due to PAT and grade of thrombosis proved highly significant (17/25 graft losses occurred in patients with grade 3 thrombosis vs . 7/25 with grade 2 thrombosis in the first 30 post-operative days, p = 0.0000 with the chi-square test).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences between techniques (p=0.00).

Compared with the negative control where a gradual decline in the mean bacterial counts was observed between 5 and 15 mins, a highly significant reduction ( p =0.000) in mean bacterial counts was observed for E. faecalis (77.3+13.6) and A. viscosus (39.6+12.6) after 5 min exposure to MTADN approaching to almost no growth after 10 min and 15 min exposure.

concluded that lipid layer anomaly dry eye was the most prevalent type of dry eye in their study.[ 10 ] A study mentioned that the prevalence of dry eye was 95% in patients with blocked meibomian glands.[ 13 ] This occurrence of MGD in dry eye is statistically highly significant ( P = 0.000) in our study.

The association between mothers’ Vit-D3 and newborn UCB Vit-D3 was highly significant (R=0.744; P =0.000), indicating a direct dependence of the newborn’s Vit-D3 on the mother’s Vit-D3 sources.

The one-tailed multinomial probability of 140,432 pairs being located on a vector is highly significant [Bin ( n = 211,426, k = 140,432, q = 0.08) = 990(z), p = 0].

Result A highly significant ( P = 0.00) threefold increase in the average number of mast cells/slide was observed in OSCC when compared to controls ( Table 1 , Figure 3 ).

In Week 1, chicks in Groups C (780 g) and D (785 g) consumed significantly more feed compared to Groups A and B (both 660 g), with a highly significant difference ( p = 0.00).

There was a highly significant correlation between RR and TCR ( r =0.59, P =0.000), RR and TTP ( r =0.52, P =0.000), TCR and TTP ( r =0.66, P =0.000), and TTP and OS ( Figure 3A ).

Comparison with an established method (TWI) Kendall's test for nonparametric correlation between the quantitative measurements (RFSA%/MISA) and the ordinal macrowear score (based on TWI) found a highly significant ( p < 0.000) moderate to strong relationship for both variables (RFSA% and MISA) in both deciduous molars (RFSA%: 0.616 strong/MISA: 0.709 strong) and permanent molars (RFSA%: 0.459 moderate/MISA: 0.563 strong).