“highly significant”

A chi-square test for trend showed a highly significant increase in PPH rates across the four risk strata ( p <0.001 for trend).

Results: Both groups showed highly significant intragroup improvements in PPD, CAL, intrabony defect depth, crestal level, and bone fill over six months (p < 0.001).

Assessment was found to be highly significant (c2 = 25.337, p < 0.001).

In Figure 3C (Cardiac rehospitalization), the HR increases for higher IC levels, with a highly significant overall association ( P < 0.001), although the non-linear association is not significant ( P = 0.694).

Highly significant p-values (p < 0.001) for the Likelihood Ratio, Wald, and Score (Log-rank) tests confirmed the robust fit of the model. 3.5.

A more detailed analysis of the Ki67, BrdU, and GFAP triple IF found an overall highly significant difference in the proportions of cell types between Tam-Idh1-KIs and controls (χ 2 5 = 43, p < 0.001).

A highly significant third‐order interaction was observed between velocity × SC × time‐of‐day in the isovelocity force data ( p < 0.001; Figure 2b ); however, this was not observed in the power data (Figure 2d ).

Global PERMANOVA revealed that the experimental groups collectively explained a highly significant proportion of ionomic variance (R2 = 0.490, P = 0.001), with homogeneous within-group dispersions confirmed prior to interpretation (Beta-dispersion test, P = 0.753).

A highly significant association was found between ovarian ultrasound examination and PCOS diagnosis ( p < 0.001).

We found 558 contigs with highly significant correlations (p < 0.001); 206 of these were positively correlated, while the remaining 352 were negatively correlated ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

In contrast, for nymph jassids, site effects were not significant before spraying and during early observations (24 and 72 h after the first spray; P > 0.05) but became significant at 48 h after the first spray (P ≤ 0.01) and remained highly significant throughout the second and third spray rounds (P ≤ 0.001) ( Table 3c ).

, 2010 ), representing a highly significant over-representation of cell cycle-regulated genes ( P -value <0.001) ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

Highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlations were seen between different developmental stages in the same location (Figure 1 ).

Phenotypic diversity and GWA study The analysis of variance revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) variability due to the genotypes for all traits (Table 1 ).

Results There was a highly significant effect of treatment water on the percentage time that larval clownfish spent in the water stream containing predator odour ( F 1,57 = 125.91, p < 0.001), but no effect of test water ( F 1,57 = 0.20, p = 0.66) and no interaction ( F 1,57 = 0.06, p = 0.81).

This overlap between cohort 1 and cohort 2 was highly significant ( P <0.001) (permutation test, based on 1000 random shufflings of H3K4me3 peaks genome-wide).

Among the covariates included in the fully adjusted model, TTP demonstrated a highly significant independent association with LAP (β = 0.46, P < 0.001).

9 , 17 , 32 Brain regions showed highly significant difference in telomere length ( P <0.001), with SN having the longest telomeres (average length=58.14) and DLPFC the shortest (average length=2.26) ( Figure 1 ).

This found a highly significant effect of Picture Type in REACT+PE (F(3,57)=8.841, P <0.001, η p 2 =0.318), with non-significant effects of Picture Type in the Control (F(3,54)=2.336, P =0.109, η p 2 =0.115) and REACT no PE Groups (F(3,57)=2.653, P =0.086, η p 2 =0.123).

Kruskal–Wallis analysis revealed highly significant differences among the three groups for all immune mediators ( p < 0.001), and pairwise comparisons confirmed significant differences between each group (HC vs.

C-index=0.816; 95% CI: 0.685-0.947), and the DeLong test demonstrated a highly significant difference between the area under the curve (AUC) (Z=-4.412; P <0.001) ( Figure 1D ).

As we had expected, the main effect of Manipulations was highly significant, F (3,63) = 130.82, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.862.

6A , using two cell lines, the reduction in 6FGA transport when the buffer lacks sodium was large, 56 % and 48 %, in LLC-PK1 and HEK293 cell, respectively and this effect was highly significant ( P = 0.001 and P = 0.000007, respectively).

When the AAR was also modeled as a categorical variable in the Cox regression model adjusted for age, sex, and BMI (with AAR =1 as the reference category), the ARR <1 showed an HR value of 1.52 (CI 95%, 0.82–2.80) for all-cause mortality, while the AAR >1 showed an HR value of 2.50 (CI 95%, 1.34–4.64) that was highly significant ( P < 0.001). 4.

Here again, there are highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the slope for the combined strabismic group and the slope for the anisometropic group.